BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net 0/3] ice: fix synchronization between .ndo_bpf() and reset
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 08:56:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmlGppe04yuGHvPx@lzaremba-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240611193837.4ffb2401@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 07:38:37PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:37:12 +0200 Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> > Fix the problems that are triggered by tx_timeout and ice_xdp() calls,
> > including both pool and program operations.
> 
> Is there really no way for ice to fix the locking? :(
> The busy loops and trylocks() are not great, and seem like duct tape.
> 

The locking mechanisms I use here do not look pretty, but if I am not missing 
anything, the synchronization they provide must be robust.

A prettier way of protecting the same critical sections would be replacing 
ICE_CFG_BUSY around ice_vsi_rebuild() with rtnl_lock(), this would eliminate 
locking code from .ndo_bpf() altogether, ice_rebuild_pending() logic will have 
to stay.

At some point I have decided to avoid using rtnl_lock(), if I do not have to. I 
think this is a goal worth pursuing?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-12  6:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-10 15:37 [PATCH iwl-net 0/3] ice: fix synchronization between .ndo_bpf() and reset Larysa Zaremba
2024-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH iwl-net 1/3] ice: synchronize XDP setup with reset Larysa Zaremba
2024-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH iwl-net 2/3] ice: fix locking in ice_xsk_pool_setup() Larysa Zaremba
2024-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH iwl-net 3/3] ice: make NAPI setting code aware that rtnl-locked request is waiting Larysa Zaremba
2024-06-12  2:38 ` [PATCH iwl-net 0/3] ice: fix synchronization between .ndo_bpf() and reset Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-12  6:56   ` Larysa Zaremba [this message]
2024-06-12 21:09     ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-13  8:54       ` Larysa Zaremba
2024-06-13 10:44         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Przemek Kitszel
2024-06-13 14:13         ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-13 15:36           ` Larysa Zaremba
2024-06-13 15:40             ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZmlGppe04yuGHvPx@lzaremba-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.kubiak@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox