Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/19] selftests/bpf: Improve libc portability / musl support (part 1)

[Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>]

Hi Andrii,

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 04:52:57PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:55 PM Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> >
> > Tony Ambardar (19):
> >   selftests/bpf: Use pid_t consistently in test_progs.c
> >   selftests/bpf: Fix compile error from rlim_t in sk_storage_map.c
> >   selftests/bpf: Fix error compiling bpf_iter_setsockopt.c with musl
> >     libc
> >   selftests/bpf: Drop unneeded include in unpriv_helpers.c
> >   selftests/bpf: Drop unneeded include in sk_lookup.c
> >   selftests/bpf: Drop unneeded include in flow_dissector.c
> 
> I squashed the above three patches into one, as they are the same kind
> of fix with the same reasoning. The rest at least have a specific
> error example, so I didn't touch them.
> 
> But generally speaking, I think it's fair to combine the same kind of
> fixes across a few files (for the future).

Thanks for clarifying this and reviewing. My concern earlier was that
squashing "Fixes:" tags could hinder backporting. Is that a non-issue?

> Applied to bpf-next, thanks.
> 

And thanks to Geliang Tang, YiFei Zhu, and Vadim Fedorenko for their
feedback.

Cheers,
Tony Ambardar

[...]