Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] igb: add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support

Kurt Kanzenbach
2024-08-14T09:12:33Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2296 bytes --]

On Wed Aug 14 2024, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:36:32AM +0200, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
>> On Sat Aug 10 2024, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> >> + nb_pkts = xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(pool, budget);
>> >> + if (!nb_pkts)
>> >> + return true;
>> >> +
>> >> + while (nb_pkts-- > 0) {
>> >> + dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(pool, descs[i].addr);
>> >> + xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(pool, dma, descs[i].len);
>> >> +
>> >> + tx_buffer_info = &tx_ring->tx_buffer_info[tx_ring->next_to_use];
>> >> + tx_buffer_info->bytecount = descs[i].len;
>> >> + tx_buffer_info->type = IGB_TYPE_XSK;
>> >> + tx_buffer_info->xdpf = NULL;
>> >> + tx_buffer_info->gso_segs = 1;
>> >> + tx_buffer_info->time_stamp = jiffies;
>> >> +
>> >> + tx_desc = IGB_TX_DESC(tx_ring, tx_ring->next_to_use);
>> >> + tx_desc->read.buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma);
>> >> +
>> >> + /* put descriptor type bits */
>> >> + cmd_type = E1000_ADVTXD_DTYP_DATA | E1000_ADVTXD_DCMD_DEXT |
>> >> + E1000_ADVTXD_DCMD_IFCS;
>> >> + olinfo_status = descs[i].len << E1000_ADVTXD_PAYLEN_SHIFT;
>> >> +
>> >> + cmd_type |= descs[i].len | IGB_TXD_DCMD;
>> >
>> > This is also sub-optimal as you are setting RS bit on each Tx descriptor,
>> > which will in turn raise a lot of irqs. See how ice sets RS bit only on
>> > last desc from a batch and then, on cleaning side, how it finds a
>> > descriptor that is supposed to have DD bit written by HW.
>>
>> I see your point. That requires changes to the cleaning side. However,
>> igb_clean_tx_irq() is shared between normal and zero-copy path.
>
> Ok if that's too much of a hassle then let's leave it as-is. I can address
> that in some nearby future.

How would you do that, by adding a dedicated igb_clean_tx_irq_zc()
function? Or is there a more simple way?

BTW: This needs to be addressed in igc too.

>
>>
>> The amount of irqs can be also controlled by irq coalescing or even
>> using busy polling. So I'd rather keep this implementation as simple as
>> it is now.
>
> That has nothing to do with what I was describing.

Ok, maybe I misunderstood your suggestion. It seemed to me that adding
the RS bit to the last frame of the burst will reduce the amount of
raised irqs.

Thanks,
Kurt

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 861 bytes --]