Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/uprobe: Add missing PID filter for uretprobe

Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-25T18:43:42Z

On 08/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> At least I certainly disagree with "Fixes: c1ae5c75e103" ;)
>
> uretprobe_perf_func/etc was designed for perf, and afaics this code still
> works fine even if you run 2 perf-record's with -p PID1/PID2 at the same
> time.

Forgot to mention...

And note that in this case uprobe_perf_func()->uprobe_perf_filter() will
never return false, and this is correct.

Oleg.