From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/9] bpf: Support private stack for struct ops programs
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:56:40 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxmbSO1DCcs5nCle@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJLmBuzMJAp5h-QAcO1zvbuBUkprib3HZ7nUAfTeHGAug@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 04:07:49PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 2:00 PM Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:19:58PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > > The __nullable argument tagging request was originally from sched_ext but I also
> > > > don't see its usage in-tree for now.
> > >
> > > ok. Let's sync up with Tejun whether they have plans to use it.
> >
> > Yeah, in sched_ext_ops.dispatch(s32 cpu, struct task_struct *prev), @prev
> > can be NULL and right now if a BPF scheduler derefs without checking for
> > NULL, it can trigger kernel crash, I think, so it needs __nullable tagging.
>
> I see. The following should do it:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 3cd7c50a51c5..82bef41d7eae 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -5492,7 +5492,7 @@ static int bpf_scx_validate(void *kdata)
> static s32 select_cpu_stub(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64
> wake_flags) { return -EINVAL; }
> static void enqueue_stub(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags) {}
> static void dequeue_stub(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags) {}
> -static void dispatch_stub(s32 prev_cpu, struct task_struct *p) {}
> +static void dispatch_stub(s32 prev_cpu, struct task_struct *p__nullable) {}
This is a lot neater than the existing workaround:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/Zxma-ZFPKYZDqCGu@slm.duckdns.org
Thanks!
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-24 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-20 19:13 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/9] bpf: Support private stack for bpf progs Yonghong Song
2024-10-20 19:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/9] bpf: Allow each subprog having stack size of 512 bytes Yonghong Song
2024-10-22 1:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-22 3:21 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-22 3:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-22 4:08 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-22 20:13 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-22 20:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-22 21:29 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-10-22 21:36 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-10-22 21:43 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-22 21:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-22 22:41 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-22 22:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-22 23:53 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-20 19:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/9] bpf: Rename bpf_struct_ops_arg_info to bpf_struct_ops_func_info Yonghong Song
2024-10-20 19:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/9] bpf: Support private stack for struct ops programs Yonghong Song
2024-10-22 1:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-22 2:59 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-22 17:26 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-22 20:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-23 21:00 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-23 23:07 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-24 0:56 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-10-20 19:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/9] bpf: Mark each subprog with proper private stack modes Yonghong Song
2024-10-20 22:01 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-21 4:22 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-20 19:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/9] bpf, x86: Refactor func emit_prologue Yonghong Song
2024-10-20 19:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 6/9] bpf, x86: Create a helper for certain "reg <op>= imm" operations Yonghong Song
2024-10-20 19:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 7/9] bpf, x86: Add jit support for private stack Yonghong Song
2024-10-20 19:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add tracing prog private stack tests Yonghong Song
2024-10-20 21:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-21 4:32 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-21 10:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-21 16:19 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-21 21:13 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-20 19:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add struct_ops " Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxmbSO1DCcs5nCle@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox