From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C365BC433F5 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 19:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238309AbiDHTv6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2022 15:51:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35110 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233000AbiDHTv5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2022 15:51:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC963CE7; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 12:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id b2-20020a17090a010200b001cb0c78db57so7474547pjb.2; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 12:49:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7VQXuZOd0i1jvW/8gCp/qhiKPoeAGyVQPlsfy06ITt4=; b=ACXahYMulsP2jKhj0mAcWDG3pD96LO59FWQpva03C0IiYkyS1uG5gdfH0vlyTwz5+c jXrKokmTChr61HZBdmc79zdx9xVFaNrQ10zYyCAWixVIq56G/B8rcu5WiE048xuOZ1go ntgJjoIHOrm286ejdw3NPZlowHtVFjdVpnQmezyhv7CfFXb2Ihx8DC+jdlMLKzf4dPFA dzyKkaTdWyi3VV8uKWpTKZOtLlrzqckNCHOMIxVjPWnLrrD+1bbL88O4Yq/h//3w20PP Cl1CZzLMZyYGaOC5T2n5P8MzDpvhvBBxWOQbKmOLCzUjyIN0C4oga79Vw9b1iJEZoXhU Basw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7VQXuZOd0i1jvW/8gCp/qhiKPoeAGyVQPlsfy06ITt4=; b=K5qWETEgb6HPsiEG0J99jveaig4nJPUhdGaNOMTd+onj+0ByqTW6iQHJzgr3O0ZMH2 MAZsTvpoYRAsb82puBgs87lobtaDUrjXHHvRbC3SwjUjZ7utReephhZsvPSvb4twLRy+ ngD1hu3Uy0I/XZvOX97YAdC0V6+cFyZTLa9VKNnEh3SZqOB/aiJ93I4bEKSKFkt1qL40 9FZ9mj5ZLeGYzLXJWGWqJj3h4AsQYBzWflscELKk+bWeYgrlm/fJXb58TYffUIIYd9Dg Iwvb4GOAz18/VJGkuz2ClkP2XlHEQDTEe1RdLCHy5FLLU/7IYBYzeYY969G9tw5790Ju 766w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53349RePgdHzml2NTWrxiQ/AgpTlCXSl++KSHDYZmP7g9h++WV4L XWYuas5GimdH4H50iTEXycw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPEx6FJevH1oP26OCAH9K0RFm/bws+3Hw1AmDOS4a9VwgmVLEiIagDWrkP6KIteD5aaDSMXQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:11c7:b0:151:9769:3505 with SMTP id q7-20020a17090311c700b0015197693505mr20712810plh.72.1649447392412; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 12:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.4] ([182.213.254.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i7-20020a628707000000b004fa6eb33b02sm26450531pfe.49.2022.04.08.12.49.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Apr 2022 12:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 04:49:46 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: atlantic: Add XDP support Content-Language: en-US To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, irusskikh@marvell.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org References: <20220408165950.10515-1-ap420073@gmail.com> <20220408115825.319e815e@kernel.org> From: Taehee Yoo In-Reply-To: <20220408115825.319e815e@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On 4/9/22 03:58, Jakub Kicinski wrote: Hi Jakub, Thank you so much for your advice! > On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 02:32:51 +0900 Taehee Yoo wrote: >> I will send v4 patch because of compile warning. > > Please don't resend your series more often than once a day. > > If your code doesn't compile cleanly, too bad, you'll have to wait. > > This is sort of documented in the FAQ: > > 2.10. I have received review feedback, when should I post a revised > version of the patches? > > Allow at least 24 hours to pass between postings. This will > ensure reviewers from all geographical locations have a chance > to chime in. Do not wait too long (weeks) between postings > either as it will make it harder for reviewers to recall all > the context. > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html#i-have-received-review-feedback-when-should-i-post-a-revised-version-of-the-patches Sorry for that I was too hasty. I will always send a new version patch after enough time for review. Thanks a lot, Taehee Yoo