From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 268E6174C9 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [217.72.192.78]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 836161BC2; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 10:41:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1688146832; x=1688751632; i=markus.elfring@web.de; bh=FAnvwTSUZAuDPRfpNhiM9u/uFKG68Fh4vSOxJQyffyc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=lK7dusW9onrm3ZEs+Zuki2dIJ08lBAc/ixI5vtV2F044RsoJL6SNvzNYYvQ/V2bvOZ4gTIM vZBPSdF9denqc/GlF/zge1+Pk+lK1A+uNjbpxYvOyGoEbWXeYISzpDoGScMVx5EZmcDy8wL2u tE5k/MjVTMbkfyZ1P3ozVlRwy5ltTH+DiNwKlv3bkgk8vO5mnjjhHfIHGbu6cE/2VJFX/WcHQ 6210inqs8G0iF0TzmDNpMyWOj18aFXpUBvEUIul3tl1hziKxSs2NlHqmmzd8KLZSloHKVTjcq 7Cpi9xmy6Kcnf9MBxseUFynSIvciIvkkSyRKVWol97XOzfpmAHOw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([94.31.90.83]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MoecF-1piBDd1fs9-00odZs; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:40:32 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:40:30 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Subject: Re: [v2 13/13] perf parse-events: Remove ABORT_ON Content-Language: en-GB To: Ian Rogers Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter , Alexander Shishkin , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Athira Rajeev , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Kan Liang , Mark Rutland , Namhyung Kim , LKML References: <20230627181030.95608-14-irogers@google.com> From: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:nUh5WnulL3jVQlK+pa8SWWryQngovVZZXunkvhg29yd4Cta6s4K WjMDV2aM1wpJVwM8bNX4ubM2ZVVjIer7vG3K7jdtVYLr4ulzmP8dMax/NG3xqLcfkediFZ+ Cpc4dKs6mDTy2rM5lReFW6m9B7AdM1jegDjqL0qQnf0ntO+KnEM8j+Jlrnp5hfiCm7jvOvo EJgs7/L0VfpVHcO0r6vew== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:OQu19h9LtwE=;j8sCM7zFUPDYdyV2eK1es6doA2r IYRHeM7M8yJ5+JN97X6pMU+kQWUIQJ7tK+94E0vI7mx9MPBiGodotNP+u7vNTopXGY2yyEGo3 7zmoYoTIJnTVYC67EZiAn+ohnWdKchcmqSiwoR39LfrYQK4maKRizRgZnYXISb+Ga4sfw5bOg SYsp10nYiVYpevC+A+ZvrLVqBGQYNDX77Oe7e0MTr00g7Yrj0M6JqYxMY1Q5knxAIz8NC/2A+ JQFB/Gamtx67zRQFYHu+UsFZPMzqSQcG3S4SjVGCKV2XIxJuKU6ajTccXrVtsg6NaLZJR/aMu nF18AXOjT+3pLGe+U3yH8CVnzx+ixt+HYlK4aEfdxK1HOQfsGFHiteGvxkD4gBVoigaMpx9EO Xpat8YwMEQE6M342WASjqy9PB+pgBCaQgNXDufnmR+syr74d9thjulopRTRk7qawrpQVqRMhs jXaGsx+czvVfiFyK4cLS2YCGDU2x37tTkmWjoiSMDTs5Dqg7HAUALLrPkTjfaAc4xyL+dk8Pu up/XULHPMS22XqATHV9zHI2MxN4y+5GHqILvo0qdybxaMTZtXP+ZQQM03mVQShYS7DUYKAb+z hyu5Pqh6tiiIEF4f3TS3Iav02G2mHF3apeUmaCxqm7cYAelLnTekKF6Z4oTABaH21Khfsahem 1lVj4rT7+Gfbr0Olq07q+68msMbiFTkn0xVqUVnC7Y+F/dfSByTqQ4ycbX9k0pvmF9Z6PgAgY 3++t049q01bIaHWDA+Q/BhDr9oVbW/ljCZrLD5Wsfia1iR8JJvLgCNICjfeiCunwgYaNdssHD w/7YL8C4DrIBnYFmUVUZhdxjLgxBj2t0cJZIt8y+R8atwOdWYfbYmpULShvBMucrQitGJi2II QQRSaonHOmlR0QEoRrzeWd5rRgP7zTJNw9i+rAnFd3i1pXuJvphGcCS0oEeSxPUiXvM1UAVYk A6IrYw== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net >>> Prefer informative messages rather than none with ABORT_ON. Document >>> one failure mode and add an error message for another. >> >> Does such a wording really fit to the known requirement =E2=80=9CSolve = only one problem per patch.=E2=80=9D? >> >> See also: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree= /Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=3Dv6.4#n81 > > Sorry your explanation isn't clear. Do you really find the application of the linked development documentation= unclear in this case? > Sorry your explanation isn't clear. Please can you elaborate. Will it become helpful to split the proposed patch into smaller update ste= ps? Regards, Markus