BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, willemb@google.com,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 07/11] net-timestamp: support hwtstamp print for bpf extension
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 15:25:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3abb0b6-cd94-46f6-b996-f90da7e790b9@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241207173803.90744-8-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

On 12/7/24 9:37 AM, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
> 
> Passing the hwtstamp to bpf prog which can print.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
> ---
>   include/net/sock.h |  6 ++++--
>   net/core/skbuff.c  | 17 +++++++++++++----
>   net/core/sock.c    |  4 +++-
>   3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index f88a00108a2f..9bc883573208 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -2921,9 +2921,11 @@ int sock_set_timestamping(struct sock *sk, int optname,
>   
>   void sock_enable_timestamps(struct sock *sk);
>   #if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF) && defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL)
> -void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op);
> +void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op,
> +			       u32 nargs, u32 *args);
>   #else
> -static inline void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op)
> +static inline void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op,
> +					     u32 nargs, u32 *args)
>   {
>   }
>   #endif
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 48b0c71e9522..182a44815630 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -5539,8 +5539,12 @@ void skb_complete_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb,
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_complete_tx_timestamp);
>   
> -static void __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int tstype)
> +static void __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> +				struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
> +				int tstype)
>   {
> +	struct timespec64 tstamp;
> +	u32 args[2] = {0, 0};
>   	int op;
>   
>   	if (!sk)
> @@ -5552,6 +5556,11 @@ static void __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int tstype
>   		break;
>   	case SCM_TSTAMP_SND:
>   		op = BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SW_OPT_CB;

> +		if (hwtstamps) {
> +			tstamp = ktime_to_timespec64(hwtstamps->hwtstamp);

Avoid this conversion which is likely not useful to the bpf prog. Directly pass 
hwtstamps->hwtstamp (in ns?) to the bpf prog. Put lower 32bits in args[0] and 
higher 32bits in args[1].

Also, how about adding a BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_"HW"_OPT_CB for the "hwtstamps != NULL" 
case instead of reusing the BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_"SW"_OPT_CB?

A more subtle thing for the hwtstamps case is, afaik the bpf prog will not be 
called. All drivers are still only testing SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP instead of testing
(SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP | SKBTX_BPF).

There are a lot of drivers to change though. A quick thought is to rename the 
existing SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP (e.g. __SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP = 1 << 0) and define 
SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP like:

#define SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP (__SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP | SKBTX_BPF)

Then change some of the existing skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags "setting" site to use 
__SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP instead. e.g. in __sock_tx_timestamp(). Not very pretty but 
may be still better than changing many drivers. May be there is a better way...

While talking about where to test the SKBTX_BPF bit, I wonder if the new 
skb_tstamp_is_set() is needed. For the non SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP case, the number of 
tx_flags testing sites should be limited, so should be easy to add the SKBTX_BPF 
bit test. e.g. at the __dev_queue_xmit, test "if 
(unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & (SKBTX_SCHED_TSTAMP | SKBTX_BPF)))". Patch 
6 has also tested the bpf specific bit at tcp_ack_tstamp() before calling the 
__skb_tstamp_tx().

At the beginning of __skb_tstamp_tx(), do something like this:

void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
		     const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
		     struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
		     struct sock *sk, int tstype)
{
	if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_SOCK_OPS) &&
	    unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_BPF))
		__skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(sk, orig_skb, hwtstamps, tstype);

	if (unlikely(!(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & ~SKBTX_BPF)))
		return;

Then the new skb_tstamp_tx_output() shuffle is probably not be needed also.

> +			args[0] = tstamp.tv_sec;
> +			args[1] = tstamp.tv_nsec;
> +		}
>   		break;
>   	case SCM_TSTAMP_ACK:
>   		op = BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_ACK_OPT_CB;
> @@ -5560,7 +5569,7 @@ static void __skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int tstype
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> -	bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(sk, skb, op);
> +	bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(sk, skb, op, 2, args);
>   }
>   
>   static void skb_tstamp_tx_output(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
> @@ -5651,7 +5660,7 @@ void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
>   	if (unlikely(skb_tstamp_is_set(orig_skb, tstype, false)))
>   		skb_tstamp_tx_output(orig_skb, ack_skb, hwtstamps, sk, tstype);
>   	if (unlikely(skb_tstamp_is_set(orig_skb, tstype, true)))
> -		__skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(sk, orig_skb, tstype);
> +		__skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(sk, orig_skb, hwtstamps, tstype);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__skb_tstamp_tx);
>   
> @@ -5662,7 +5671,7 @@ void skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
>   
>   	skb_tstamp_tx_output(orig_skb, NULL, hwtstamps, orig_skb->sk, tstype);
>   	if (unlikely(skb_tstamp_is_set(orig_skb, tstype, true)))
> -		__skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(orig_skb->sk, orig_skb, tstype);
> +		__skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(orig_skb->sk, orig_skb, hwtstamps, tstype);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_tstamp_tx);
>   
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 79cb5c74c76c..504939bafe0c 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -942,7 +942,8 @@ int sock_set_timestamping(struct sock *sk, int optname,
>   }
>   
>   #if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF) && defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL)
> -void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op)
> +void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op,
> +			       u32 nargs, u32 *args)

Directly pass hwtstamps->hwtstamp instead of args and nargs. Save a memcpy below.

>   {
>   	struct bpf_sock_ops_kern sock_ops;
>   
> @@ -952,6 +953,7 @@ void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op)
>   	sock_ops.op = op;
>   	sock_ops.is_fullsock = 1;
>   	sock_ops.sk = sk;
> +	memcpy(sock_ops.args, args, nargs * sizeof(*args));
>   	__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_ops(sk, &sock_ops, CGROUP_SOCK_OPS);
>   }
>   #endif


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-12 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-07 17:37 [PATCH net-next v4 00/11] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Jason Xing
2024-12-07 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/11] net-timestamp: add support for bpf_setsockopt() Jason Xing
2024-12-09  4:28   ` kernel test robot
2024-12-09  4:31   ` kernel test robot
2024-12-12 19:34   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-13 14:12     ` Jason Xing
2024-12-07 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/11] net-timestamp: prepare for bpf prog use Jason Xing
2024-12-11  2:02   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-11  9:17     ` Jason Xing
2024-12-13  1:41       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-13 14:42         ` Jason Xing
2024-12-13 22:26           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-13 23:56             ` Jason Xing
2024-12-07 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/11] net-timestamp: reorganize in skb_tstamp_tx_output() Jason Xing
2024-12-09 14:37   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-12-09 14:57     ` Jason Xing
2024-12-07 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/11] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_SCHED for bpf extension Jason Xing
2024-12-07 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/11] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_SND " Jason Xing
2024-12-07 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/11] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_ACK " Jason Xing
2024-12-12 22:36   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-13 14:49     ` Jason Xing
2024-12-13 22:46       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-07 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/11] net-timestamp: support hwtstamp print " Jason Xing
2024-12-12 23:25   ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-12-13  6:28     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-13 15:13     ` Jason Xing
2024-12-13 23:15       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-14  0:02         ` Jason Xing
2024-12-14  0:17           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-14  0:48             ` Jason Xing
2024-12-07 17:38 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/11] net-timestamp: make TCP tx timestamp bpf extension work Jason Xing
2024-12-07 17:38 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/11] net-timestamp: introduce cgroup lock to avoid affecting non-bpf cases Jason Xing
2024-12-07 17:38 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/11] net-timestamp: export the tskey for TCP bpf extension Jason Xing
2024-12-13  0:28   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-13 15:44     ` Jason Xing
2024-12-13 23:55       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-14  0:09         ` Jason Xing
2025-01-08  4:21     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-08 12:55       ` Jason Xing
2025-01-10 20:35       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-10 22:46         ` Jason Xing
2024-12-07 17:38 ` [PATCH net-next v4 11/11] bpf: add simple bpf tests in the tx path for so_timstamping feature Jason Xing
2024-12-09 14:45   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-12-09 14:58     ` Jason Xing
2024-12-13  1:14   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-13 16:02     ` Jason Xing
2024-12-14  0:14       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-14  0:45         ` Jason Xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a3abb0b6-cd94-46f6-b996-f90da7e790b9@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox