BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	syzbot+45b0c89a0fc7ae8dbadc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Fix bpf_prog nested call in trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 10:46:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3fa6129-933a-4747-8165-884e38c58e3b@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJNmS-3gDQ4=GRGzk00S-n9KOs2temi+P-7Nac_gnx5DQ@mail.gmail.com>

在 2025/5/13 07:59, Alexei Starovoitov 写道:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 7:59 AM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> syzkaller reported an issue:
>>
>>   bpf_prog_ec3b2eefa702d8d3+0x43/0x47
>>   bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1316 [inline]
>>   __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:718 [inline]
>>   bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:725 [inline]
>>   __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2363 [inline]
>>   bpf_trace_run3+0x23f/0x5a0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2405
>>   __bpf_trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned+0xfc/0x140 include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47
>>   __traceiter_mmap_lock_acquire_returned+0x79/0xc0 include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47
>>   __do_trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47 [inline]
>>   trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47 [inline]
>>   __mmap_lock_do_trace_acquire_returned+0x138/0x1f0 mm/mmap_lock.c:35
>>   __mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned include/linux/mmap_lock.h:36 [inline]
>>   mmap_read_trylock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:204 [inline]
>>   stack_map_get_build_id_offset+0x535/0x6f0 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:157
>>   __bpf_get_stack+0x307/0xa10 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:483
>>   ____bpf_get_stack kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:499 [inline]
>>   bpf_get_stack+0x32/0x40 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:496
>>   ____bpf_get_stack_raw_tp kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1941 [inline]
>>   bpf_get_stack_raw_tp+0x124/0x160 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1931
>>   bpf_prog_ec3b2eefa702d8d3+0x43/0x47
>>   bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1316 [inline]
>>   __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:718 [inline]
>>   bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:725 [inline]
>>   __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2363 [inline]
>>   bpf_trace_run3+0x23f/0x5a0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2405
>>   __bpf_trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned+0xfc/0x140 include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47
>>   __traceiter_mmap_lock_acquire_returned+0x79/0xc0 include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47
>>   __do_trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47 [inline]
>>   trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned include/trace/events/mmap_lock.h:47 [inline]
>>   __mmap_lock_do_trace_acquire_returned+0x138/0x1f0 mm/mmap_lock.c:35
>>   __mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned include/linux/mmap_lock.h:36 [inline]
>>   mmap_read_lock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:185 [inline]
>>   exit_mm kernel/exit.c:565 [inline]
>>   do_exit+0xf72/0x2c30 kernel/exit.c:940
>>   do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1102
>>   __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1113 [inline]
>>   __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1111 [inline]
>>   __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3e/0x50 kernel/exit.c:1111
>>   x64_sys_call+0x1530/0x1730 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232
>>   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
>>   do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x260 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
>>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>>
>> mmap_read_trylock is used in stack_map_get_build_id_offset, if user
>> wants to trace trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned tracepoint and get user
>> stack in the bpf_prog, it will call trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned
>> again in the bpf_get_stack, which will lead to a nested call relationship.
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+45b0c89a0fc7ae8dbadc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/8bc2554d-1052-4922-8832-e0078a033e1d@gmail.com
>> Fixes: 2f1aaf3ea666 ("bpf, mm: Fix lockdep warning triggered by stack_map_get_build_id_offset()")
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>   kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 6 +++++-
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> index 3615c06b7dfa..eec51f069028 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> @@ -130,6 +130,10 @@ static int fetch_build_id(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned char *build_id, b
>>                           : build_id_parse_nofault(vma, build_id, NULL);
>>   }
>>
>> +static inline bool mmap_read_trylock_no_trace(struct mm_struct *mm)
>> +{
>> +       return down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_lock) != 0;
>> +}
>>   /*
>>    * Expects all id_offs[i].ip values to be set to correct initial IPs.
>>    * They will be subsequently:
>> @@ -154,7 +158,7 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
>>           * build_id.
>>           */
>>          if (!user || !current || !current->mm || irq_work_busy ||
>> -           !mmap_read_trylock(current->mm)) {
>> +           !mmap_read_trylock_no_trace(current->mm)) {
> 
> This is not a fix.
> It doesn't address the issue.
> Since syzbot managed to craft such corner case,
> let's remove WARN_ON_ONCE from get_bpf_raw_tp_regs() for now.
> 
> In the long run we may consider adding a per-tracepoint
> recursion count for particularly dangerous tracepoints like this one,

This looks more general.

> but let's not do it just yet.
> Removing WARN_ON_ONCE should do it.

Will change it in v2.

> 
> pw-bot: cr


-- 
Best Regards
Tao Chen

      reply	other threads:[~2025-05-13  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-12 14:59 [PATCH] bpf: Fix bpf_prog nested call in trace_mmap_lock_acquire_returned Tao Chen
2025-05-12 23:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-13  2:46   ` Tao Chen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a3fa6129-933a-4747-8165-884e38c58e3b@linux.dev \
    --to=chen.dylane@linux.dev \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+45b0c89a0fc7ae8dbadc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox