From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 2/6] libbpf: Fix memory leak in parse_usdt_arg()
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 14:26:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a49eed59-8e26-fa9c-c7a6-8cb4656b0d55@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzbJ8LW1Q_hBc-eB25f=F+jdQ5aPucEv_oDNrbjB=GGR+g@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/11/2022 9:34 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:08 AM Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> In the arm64 version of parse_usdt_arg(), when sscanf returns 2, reg_name
>> is allocated but not freed. Fix it.
>>
>> Fixes: 0f8619929c57 ("libbpf: Usdt aarch64 arg parsing support")
>> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
>> index e83b497c2245..f3b5be7415b5 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
>> @@ -1351,8 +1351,10 @@ static int parse_usdt_arg(const char *arg_str, int arg_num, struct usdt_arg_spec
>> char *reg_name = NULL;
>> int arg_sz, len, reg_off;
>> long off;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> - if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ \[ %m[a-z0-9], %ld ] %n", &arg_sz, ®_name, &off, &len) == 3) {
>> + ret = sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ \[ %m[a-z0-9], %ld ] %n", &arg_sz, ®_name, &off, &len);
>> + if (ret == 3) {
>> /* Memory dereference case, e.g., -4@[sp, 96] */
>> arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_REG_DEREF;
>> arg->val_off = off;
>> @@ -1361,32 +1363,37 @@ static int parse_usdt_arg(const char *arg_str, int arg_num, struct usdt_arg_spec
>> if (reg_off < 0)
>> return reg_off;
>> arg->reg_off = reg_off;
>> - } else if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ \[ %m[a-z0-9] ] %n", &arg_sz, ®_name, &len) == 2) {
>> - /* Memory dereference case, e.g., -4@[sp] */
>> - arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_REG_DEREF;
>> - arg->val_off = 0;
>> - reg_off = calc_pt_regs_off(reg_name);
>> - free(reg_name);
>> - if (reg_off < 0)
>> - return reg_off;
>> - arg->reg_off = reg_off;
>> - } else if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ %ld %n", &arg_sz, &off, &len) == 2) {
>> - /* Constant value case, e.g., 4@5 */
>> - arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_CONST;
>> - arg->val_off = off;
>> - arg->reg_off = 0;
>> - } else if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ %m[a-z0-9] %n", &arg_sz, ®_name, &len) == 2) {
>> - /* Register read case, e.g., -8@x4 */
>> - arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_REG;
>> - arg->val_off = 0;
>> - reg_off = calc_pt_regs_off(reg_name);
>> - free(reg_name);
>> - if (reg_off < 0)
>> - return reg_off;
>> - arg->reg_off = reg_off;
>> } else {
>> - pr_warn("usdt: unrecognized arg #%d spec '%s'\n", arg_num, arg_str);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + if (ret == 2)
>> + free(reg_name);
>> +
>> + if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ \[ %m[a-z0-9] ] %n", &arg_sz, ®_name, &len) == 2) {
>> + /* Memory dereference case, e.g., -4@[sp] */
>> + arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_REG_DEREF;
>> + arg->val_off = 0;
>> + reg_off = calc_pt_regs_off(reg_name);
>> + free(reg_name);
>> + if (reg_off < 0)
>> + return reg_off;
>> + arg->reg_off = reg_off;
>> + } else if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ %ld %n", &arg_sz, &off, &len) == 2) {
>> + /* Constant value case, e.g., 4@5 */
>> + arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_CONST;
>> + arg->val_off = off;
>> + arg->reg_off = 0;
>> + } else if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ %m[a-z0-9] %n", &arg_sz, ®_name, &len) == 2) {
>> + /* Register read case, e.g., -8@x4 */
>> + arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_REG;
>> + arg->val_off = 0;
>> + reg_off = calc_pt_regs_off(reg_name);
>> + free(reg_name);
>> + if (reg_off < 0)
>> + return reg_off;
>> + arg->reg_off = reg_off;
>> + } else {
>> + pr_warn("usdt: unrecognized arg #%d spec '%s'\n", arg_num, arg_str);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>
> I think all this is more complicated than it has to be. How big can
> register names be? Few characters? Let's get rid of %m[a-z0-9] and
> instead use fixed-max-length strings, e.g., %5s. And read register
> names into such local char buffers. It will simplify everything
> tremendously. Let's use 16-byte buffers and use %15s to match it?
> Would that be enough?
>
The valid register names accepted by calc_pt_regs_off() are x0~x31 and sp, so
16-byte buffer is enough. Since %15s matches all non-space characters, will use
%15[a-z0-9] to match it.
>> arg->arg_signed = arg_sz < 0;
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
> .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-11 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-10 14:25 [PATCH bpf v3 0/6] Fix bugs found by ASAN when running selftests Xu Kuohai
2022-10-10 14:25 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/6] libbpf: Fix use-after-free in btf_dump_name_dups Xu Kuohai
2022-10-11 1:32 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-11 6:25 ` Xu Kuohai
2022-10-10 14:25 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/6] libbpf: Fix memory leak in parse_usdt_arg() Xu Kuohai
2022-10-11 1:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-11 6:26 ` Xu Kuohai [this message]
2022-10-10 14:25 ` [PATCH bpf v3 3/6] selftests/bpf: Fix memory leak caused by not destroying skeleton Xu Kuohai
2022-10-10 14:25 ` [PATCH bpf v3 4/6] selftest/bpf: Fix memory leak in kprobe_multi_test Xu Kuohai
2022-10-11 1:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-11 6:26 ` Xu Kuohai
2022-10-10 14:25 ` [PATCH bpf v3 5/6] selftests/bpf: Fix error failure of case test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow Xu Kuohai
2022-10-10 14:25 ` [PATCH bpf v3 6/6] selftest/bpf: Fix error usage of ASSERT_OK in xdp_adjust_tail.c Xu Kuohai
2022-10-11 1:37 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/6] Fix bugs found by ASAN when running selftests Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-11 6:30 ` Xu Kuohai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a49eed59-8e26-fa9c-c7a6-8cb4656b0d55@huawei.com \
--to=xukuohai@huawei.com \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=delyank@fb.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox