From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 8/9] bpf: Introduce bpf register BPF_REG_PARAMS
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:09:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a98248e8-8b70-4125-b494-1a5ff12396fd@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DHZ6DPP9Q67P.17W3L0YIPN8Z4@gmail.com>
On 4/21/26 3:10 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue Apr 21, 2026 at 10:20 AM PDT, Yonghong Song wrote:
>>
>> /* Kernel hidden auxiliary/helper register. */
>> -#define BPF_REG_AX MAX_BPF_REG
>> -#define MAX_BPF_EXT_REG (MAX_BPF_REG + 1)
>> +#define BPF_REG_PARAMS MAX_BPF_REG
>> +#define BPF_REG_AX (MAX_BPF_REG + 1)
>> +#define MAX_BPF_EXT_REG (MAX_BPF_REG + 2)
> ...
>
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c
>> @@ -630,13 +630,13 @@ __xlated("...")
>> __xlated("4: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
>> __xlated("...")
>> /* may_goto expansion starts */
>> -__xlated("6: r11 = *(u64 *)(r10 -24)")
>> -__xlated("7: if r11 == 0x0 goto pc+6")
>> -__xlated("8: r11 -= 1")
>> -__xlated("9: if r11 != 0x0 goto pc+2")
>> -__xlated("10: r11 = -24")
>> +__xlated("6: r12 = *(u64 *)(r10 -24)")
>> +__xlated("7: if r12 == 0x0 goto pc+6")
>> +__xlated("8: r12 -= 1")
>> +__xlated("9: if r12 != 0x0 goto pc+2")
>> +__xlated("10: r12 = -24")
> maybe shift it to r15 right away, so we don't need to touch this code
> if/when true r12 is introduced?
We can do this. Do you think the following is okay:
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index b77d0b06db6e..fe7b6b943ea4 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ struct ctl_table_header;
/* Kernel hidden auxiliary/helper register. */
#define BPF_REG_PARAMS MAX_BPF_REG
-#define BPF_REG_AX (MAX_BPF_REG + 1)
-#define MAX_BPF_EXT_REG (MAX_BPF_REG + 2)
+#define MAX_BPF_EXT_REG (MAX_BPF_REG + 1)
#define MAX_BPF_JIT_REG MAX_BPF_EXT_REG
+#define BPF_REG_AX (MAX_BPF_REG + 4)
/* unused opcode to mark special call to bpf_tail_call() helper */
#define BPF_TAIL_CALL 0xf0
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index ae10b9ca018d..3ad286ef3085 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1299,8 +1299,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_blind_insn(const struct bpf_insn *from,
u32 imm_rnd = get_random_u32();
s16 off;
- BUILD_BUG_ON(BPF_REG_PARAMS + 2 != MAX_BPF_JIT_REG);
- BUILD_BUG_ON(BPF_REG_AX + 1 != MAX_BPF_JIT_REG);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(BPF_REG_PARAMS + 1 != MAX_BPF_JIT_REG);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(BPF_REG_AX != MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 3);
/* Constraints on AX register:
*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 17:19 [PATCH bpf-next 0/9] bpf: Prepare to support stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/9] bpf: Remove unused parameter from check_map_kptr_access() Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/9] bpf: Fix tail_call_reachable leak Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 18:06 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-22 0:29 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/9] bpf: Remove WARN_ON_ONCE in check_kfunc_mem_size_reg() Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/9] bpf: Refactor to avoid redundant calculation of bpf_reg_state Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 21:40 ` Amery Hung
2026-04-21 23:42 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/9] bpf: Refactor to handle memory and size together Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/9] bpf: Rename existing argno to arg Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 17:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/9] bpf: Prepare verifier logs for upcoming kfunc stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 22:07 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-21 23:56 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-22 0:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-22 1:20 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-22 1:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-21 17:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/9] bpf: Introduce bpf register BPF_REG_PARAMS Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 22:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-22 0:09 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-04-22 0:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-22 1:10 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 17:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 9/9] bpf: Reuse MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS for maximum number of arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-21 17:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-21 19:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/9] bpf: Prepare to support stack arguments Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a98248e8-8b70-4125-b494-1a5ff12396fd@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox