From: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 17/17] selftests/bpf: add C-level selftests for indirect jumps
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 13:34:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPjdeCjV4fYqqPeR@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a9c5da97ad4f2d3ccccf315cb855b4d896f5a7c.camel@gmail.com>
On 25/10/21 05:27PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Sun, 2025-10-19 at 20:21 +0000, Anton Protopopov wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_gotox.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_gotox.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..4394654ac75a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_gotox.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +#include <test_progs.h>
> > +
> > +#include <linux/if_ether.h>
> > +#include <linux/in.h>
> > +#include <linux/ip.h>
> > +#include <linux/ipv6.h>
> > +#include <linux/in6.h>
> > +#include <linux/udp.h>
> > +#include <linux/tcp.h>
> > +
> > +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> > +#include <bpf/bpf.h>
> > +
> > +#include "bpf_gotox.skel.h"
> > +
> > +/* Disable tests for now, as CI runs with LLVM-20 */
> > +#if 0
>
> I removed all the `#if 0` and tried to compile this test using LLVM at commit
> 1a9aba29b09e ("[RISCV] Remove unreachable break statements. NFC (#164481)").
>
> LLVM refuses to compile showing errors like below:
>
> CLNG-BPF [test_progs-cpuv4] bpf_gotox.bpf.o
> fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: <U+001B>[0;31mt15<U+001B>[0m: ch = brind <U+001B>[0;30mt7<U+001B>[0m, <U+001B>[0;30mt14<U+001B>[0m
> <U+001B>[0;30mt14<U+001B>[0m: i64,ch = load<(invariant load (s64) from %ir.arrayidx)> <U+001B>[0;30mt0<U+001B>[0m, <U+001B>[0;36mt13<U+001B>[0m, undef:i64, progs/bpf_gotox.c:202:8
> <U+001B>[0;36mt13<U+001B>[0m: i64 = add nuw <U+001B>[0;33mt17<U+001B>[0m, <U+001B>[0;35mt12<U+001B>[0m, progs/bpf_gotox.c:202:8
> <U+001B>[0;33mt17<U+001B>[0m: i64 = LDIMM64 TargetGlobalAddress:i64<ptr @__const.big_jump_table.jt> 0, progs/bpf_gotox.c:202:8
> <U+001B>[0;35mt12<U+001B>[0m: i64 = shl nuw nsw <U+001B>[0;32mt9<U+001B>[0m, Constant:i64<3>, progs/bpf_gotox.c:202:8
> <U+001B>[0;32mt9<U+001B>[0m: i64 = and <U+001B>[0;35mt5<U+001B>[0m, Constant:i64<255>, progs/bpf_gotox.c:202:18
> <U+001B>[0;35mt5<U+001B>[0m: i64,ch = load<(load (s64) from %ir.ctx)> <U+001B>[0;30mt0<U+001B>[0m, <U+001B>[0;32mt2<U+001B>[0m, undef:i64, progs/bpf_gotox.c:202:16
> <U+001B>[0;32mt2<U+001B>[0m: i64,ch = CopyFromReg <U+001B>[0;30mt0<U+001B>[0m, Register:i64 %5
> In function: big_jump_table
>
> CC'ing Yonghong.
Looks like no -mcpu=v4. I had to hack Makefile (set v3 -> v4) to build it.
Even when one tries to build test_progs-cpuv4, the v3 version is
also built. In the bpf prog this is easy to ifdef it: x86_64 +
__clang + one can define a variable like BPF_CPU=4 in Makefile.
But the prog_tests can't easily see was the skeleton compiled
with v3 or v4, so I just ended up with putting #if 0 there for now...
> [...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-19 20:21 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 00/17] BPF indirect jumps Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 01/17] bpf: fix the return value of push_stack Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 02/17] bpf: save the start of functions in bpf_prog_aux Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 03/17] bpf: generalize and export map_get_next_key for arrays Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 04/17] bpf, x86: add new map type: instructions array Anton Protopopov
2025-10-21 17:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-21 18:32 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-21 23:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-24 12:12 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 05/17] selftests/bpf: add selftests for new insn_array map Anton Protopopov
2025-10-21 23:51 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-22 13:44 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-22 13:55 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-22 14:06 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-22 14:03 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-22 14:13 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-22 17:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 06/17] bpf: support instructions arrays with constants blinding Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 07/17] selftests/bpf: test instructions arrays with blinding Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 08/17] bpf, x86: allow indirect jumps to r8...r15 Anton Protopopov
2025-10-20 8:38 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 09/17] bpf: make bpf_insn_successors to return a pointer Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 10/17] bpf, x86: add support for indirect jumps Anton Protopopov
2025-10-20 7:23 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-21 21:17 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-22 6:51 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-22 6:53 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 11/17] bpf: disasm: add support for BPF_JMP|BPF_JA|BPF_X Anton Protopopov
2025-10-21 21:19 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 12/17] bpf, docs: do not state that indirect jumps are not supported Anton Protopopov
2025-10-21 19:15 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-21 19:32 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-21 19:36 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-21 19:50 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-21 20:17 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 13/17] libbpf: fix formatting of bpf_object__append_subprog_code Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 14/17] libbpf: support llvm-generated indirect jumps Anton Protopopov
2025-10-21 22:18 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-21 22:45 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-24 12:52 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-25 17:39 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 15/17] bpftool: Recognize insn_array map type Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 16/17] selftests/bpf: add new verifier_gotox test Anton Protopopov
2025-10-21 22:42 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-24 11:40 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-26 12:34 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-27 23:11 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-28 12:06 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-19 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 17/17] selftests/bpf: add C-level selftests for indirect jumps Anton Protopopov
2025-10-22 0:27 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-22 13:34 ` Anton Protopopov [this message]
2025-10-25 17:41 ` Anton Protopopov
2025-10-21 18:30 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 00/17] BPF " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPjdeCjV4fYqqPeR@mail.gmail.com \
--to=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=aspsk@isovalent.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).