Re: Linux 6.19-rc1

[Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>]

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 06:46:29AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> -----------------------------------------
> Building mips:db1xxx_defconfig ... failed
> Building mips:mtx1_defconfig ... failed
> 
> --------------
> Error log:
> In file included from include/linux/pgtable.h:6,
>                  from include/linux/mm.h:31,
>                  from arch/mips/alchemy/common/setup.c:30:
> arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h:608:32: error: static declaration of 'io_remap_pfn_range_pfn' follows non-static declaration
>   608 | #define io_remap_pfn_range_pfn io_remap_pfn_range_pfn
>       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/mips/alchemy/common/setup.c:97:29: note: in expansion of macro 'io_remap_pfn_range_pfn'
>    97 | static inline unsigned long io_remap_pfn_range_pfn(unsigned long pfn,
>       |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h:607:15: note: previous declaration of 'io_remap_pfn_range_pfn' with type 'long unsigned int(long unsigned int,  long unsigned int)'
>   607 | unsigned long io_remap_pfn_range_pfn(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size);
>       |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Probably caused by commit c707a68f9468 ("mm: abstract io_remap_pfn_range()
> based on PFN") or related patches. Still bisecting.

I've applied to patch to mips-fixes branch for that.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]