From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 208533EFD27; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 23:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768950605; cv=none; b=Dk6z8B5gApQtnhR8nRNmdybyvj2+9wo+jYYziijOHS6qO7ySYEgSUEfEgwSos+m9eHQnvXr0HTW8fEKmE+4MMVvCpU41WObcvX94cJrwakI8quu0yQ/Iv61bvkr1d597x2VwMBLNUx5rdcG1+sEKHAVlEtAeSWlHfRrY4e4d3kM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768950605; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3IjOD+VAe3GNNkUX/GpyE+1pGlICS4A+BZXqn9AqPxQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=esz2+ZvUSzw9cx4Znimpne3CWxHkIEW4qNBDOwC3xN7PbuogT0E06t8vsM0oQ/avt2fcsu7a+aOZCFZ5jdwr6ZN6uvolxNuz1r1bG78LOIDWjS2EbvVx4rNqQb94xZOKwT5aDrzQt0RDknrbw6414Kt33PbnCBfepYLu6d+qMTk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FrAPU/Kt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FrAPU/Kt" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C1FFC16AAE; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 23:10:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768950604; bh=3IjOD+VAe3GNNkUX/GpyE+1pGlICS4A+BZXqn9AqPxQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FrAPU/Ktfm6dxyYY59hwlo0toVLt/BhpdvioyNY+14p9uOAkzQ7mpvcQatGAZU/vb ZI9ZjBeywNo+e3ahs+108jYuXvNlTUwzTTYm0vqK529q8+xnN7fttD9Al5USirTbH7 cCmpAjoJDn6ZDQf3xJtMk39F9IirxAdd6Ltd1mGVmD15wnrhiPirITrvhelR+CaLiV 7i+qcWlMN9Sftw02YkNW60QtcSv07JRwYbpGMs842gpbdCwIdN2ASabDHbbwTdljM4 RN80jvkHIAdZVq+2zPkgC7o0LDIB2zRi+kPKxk4LV4h2StEuMsZTQwWFHmra2MWCMQ hilE+hrl+sHGg== Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 13:10:03 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Andrea Righi Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , Joel Fernandes , David Vernet , Changwoo Min , Shuah Khan , sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET RESEND v11 sched_ext/for-6.20] Add a deadline server for sched_ext tasks Message-ID: References: <20260120215808.188032-1-arighi@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260120215808.188032-1-arighi@nvidia.com> Hello, On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 10:50:31PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote: > This is a resend of the patch set originally posted here: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251217093923.1556187-1-arighi@nvidia.com/ > > Re-sending to check whether there are any remaining objections. As > discussed during the LPC sched_ext microconference in Tokyo, a potential > "open issue" could be to define a better interface for configuring the > assigned bandwidth for the DL servers (currently via debugfs). However, > this shouldn't be a blocker and we can likely discuss this further at the > upcoming OSPM. > > Tejun, if there are no further comments, I think this series can be applied > to sched_ext/for-6.20. Yeah, this has been pending forever. Peter, Ingo, Juri, if there aren't any objections, would it be okay to apply these through sched_ext? Or do you want to route deadline part through sched/core? Thanks. -- tejun