public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] selftest/bpf: enable test for instruction array on arm64
  2026-02-23 20:35 [PATCH] selftest/bpf: enable test for instruction array on arm64 adubey
@ 2026-02-23 16:17 ` Anton Protopopov
  2026-02-24  2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anton Protopopov @ 2026-02-23 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: adubey
  Cc: bpf, puranjay, ast, andrii, daniel, martin.lau, eddyz87, memxor,
	mykyta.yatsenko5

On 26/02/23 03:35PM, adubey@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> From: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> As arm64 JIT now supports instruction array, make sure
> all relevant tests run on this architecture.
> 
> #21/1    bpf_insn_array/one2one:OK
> #21/2    bpf_insn_array/simple:OK
> #21/3    bpf_insn_array/deletions:OK
> #21/4    bpf_insn_array/deletions-with-functions:OK
> #21/5    bpf_insn_array/blindness:OK
> #21/6    bpf_insn_array/incorrect-index:OK
> #21/7    bpf_insn_array/load-unfrozen-map:OK
> #21/8    bpf_insn_array/no-map-reuse:OK
> #21/9    bpf_insn_array/bpf-side-ops:OK
> #21      bpf_insn_array:OK
> Summary: 1/9 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c
> index 269870bec941..93166c2da8e7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>  #include <bpf/bpf.h>
>  #include <test_progs.h>
>  
> -#ifdef __x86_64__
> +#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
>  static int map_create(__u32 map_type, __u32 max_entries)
>  {
>  	const char *map_name = "insn_array";
> -- 
> 2.52.0
> 

Acked-by: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] selftest/bpf: enable test for instruction array on arm64
@ 2026-02-23 20:35 adubey
  2026-02-23 16:17 ` Anton Protopopov
  2026-02-24  2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: adubey @ 2026-02-23 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: puranjay, ast, andrii, daniel, martin.lau, eddyz87, memxor,
	mykyta.yatsenko5, Abhishek Dubey

From: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>

As arm64 JIT now supports instruction array, make sure
all relevant tests run on this architecture.

#21/1    bpf_insn_array/one2one:OK
#21/2    bpf_insn_array/simple:OK
#21/3    bpf_insn_array/deletions:OK
#21/4    bpf_insn_array/deletions-with-functions:OK
#21/5    bpf_insn_array/blindness:OK
#21/6    bpf_insn_array/incorrect-index:OK
#21/7    bpf_insn_array/load-unfrozen-map:OK
#21/8    bpf_insn_array/no-map-reuse:OK
#21/9    bpf_insn_array/bpf-side-ops:OK
#21      bpf_insn_array:OK
Summary: 1/9 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c
index 269870bec941..93166c2da8e7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 #include <test_progs.h>
 
-#ifdef __x86_64__
+#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
 static int map_create(__u32 map_type, __u32 max_entries)
 {
 	const char *map_name = "insn_array";
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] selftest/bpf: enable test for instruction array on arm64
  2026-02-23 20:35 [PATCH] selftest/bpf: enable test for instruction array on arm64 adubey
  2026-02-23 16:17 ` Anton Protopopov
@ 2026-02-24  2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-02-24  2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: adubey
  Cc: bpf, puranjay, ast, andrii, daniel, martin.lau, eddyz87, memxor,
	mykyta.yatsenko5

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 15:35:11 -0500 you wrote:
> From: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> As arm64 JIT now supports instruction array, make sure
> all relevant tests run on this architecture.
> 
> #21/1    bpf_insn_array/one2one:OK
> #21/2    bpf_insn_array/simple:OK
> #21/3    bpf_insn_array/deletions:OK
> #21/4    bpf_insn_array/deletions-with-functions:OK
> #21/5    bpf_insn_array/blindness:OK
> #21/6    bpf_insn_array/incorrect-index:OK
> #21/7    bpf_insn_array/load-unfrozen-map:OK
> #21/8    bpf_insn_array/no-map-reuse:OK
> #21/9    bpf_insn_array/bpf-side-ops:OK
> #21      bpf_insn_array:OK
> Summary: 1/9 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - selftest/bpf: enable test for instruction array on arm64
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/99726ece0c8a

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-24  2:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-23 20:35 [PATCH] selftest/bpf: enable test for instruction array on arm64 adubey
2026-02-23 16:17 ` Anton Protopopov
2026-02-24  2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox