From: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
To: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>, sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix end-of-list detection in cgroup_storage_get_next_key()
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 21:39:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac_DI5edNfHp8NOi@SLSGDTSWING002> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac-7FQM9UDm7tYxF@mail.gmail.com>
On 26-04-03 15:05, Paul Chaignon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 08:56:06AM +0800, sun jian wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2026 at 3:31 AM Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > list_next_entry() never returns NULL -- when the current element is the
> > > last entry it wraps to the list head via container_of(). The subsequent
> > > NULL check is therefore dead code and get_next_key() never returns
> > > -ENOENT for the last element, instead reading storage->key from a bogus
> > > pointer that aliases internal map fields and copying the result to
> > > userspace.
> > >
> > > Replace it with list_entry_is_head() so the function correctly returns
> > > -ENOENT when there are no more entries.
> > >
> > > Fixes: de9cbbaadba5 ("bpf: introduce cgroup storage maps")
> > > Reported-by: Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>
> > > Signed-off-by: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
>
> Acked-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
>
> > > ---
> > > kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
> > > index 8fca0c64f7b1..23267213a17f 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
> > > @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int cgroup_storage_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
> > > goto enoent;
> > >
> > > storage = list_next_entry(storage, list_map);
> > > - if (!storage)
> > > + if (list_entry_is_head(storage, &map->list, list_map))
> > > goto enoent;
> > > } else {
> > > storage = list_first_entry(&map->list,
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
> > >
> > Looks correct to me. It might also be worth adding a selftest for this
> > cornet case.
>
> I agree, it would be good to cover this in selftests. You can use the
> following diff for that:
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_storage.c
> index cf395715ced4..5451a43b3563 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_storage.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_storage.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,11 @@ void test_cgroup_storage(void)
> err = SYS_NOFAIL(PING_CMD);
> ASSERT_OK(err, "sixth ping");
>
> + err = bpf_map__get_next_key(skel->maps.cgroup_storage, &key, &key,
> + sizeof(key));
> + ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map__get_next_key should fail");
> + ASSERT_EQ(errno, ENOENT, "no second key");
> +
> cleanup_progs:
> cgroup_storage__destroy(skel);
> cleanup_network:
>
>
> >
> > Reviewed by Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
> >
Thanks for the your review and the selftest suggestion! I've incorporated it in v2.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 19:26 [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix end-of-list detection in cgroup_storage_get_next_key() Weiming Shi
2026-04-02 0:56 ` sun jian
2026-04-03 13:05 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-04-03 13:39 ` Weiming Shi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac_DI5edNfHp8NOi@SLSGDTSWING002 \
--to=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox