Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Exit early if reg_bounds_sync gets invalid inputs

Paul Chaignon
2026-04-01T21:19:57Z

On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 01:21:02PM -0700, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2026-04-01 at 15:36 -0400, Harishankar Vishwanathan wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 8:21 AM Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

> What are remaining steps for this patch-set?
> Here are outstanding comments:
> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/33c006d7275cb443b5750f062cb78c38449a7537.camel@gmail.com/
> resolved as noop
> 2. https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ed85ac25cd315ac4273de335943f9f3a2c1f36e8.camel@gmail.com/
> resolved, only if inputs are in bogus state, will be handled by a follow-up.
> 3. https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/7vwyzvy7cwy2n4c52fcurg4dnv4bqijtovmkeh3zgu6ey266vc@dtt3r5usvev5/
> Some wording nits, do you intend to fix those?
> 4. https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/847173114a13630e1512ad05375c6b407720a916.camel@gmail.com/
> Will be resolved as a follow-up.
> 5. https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87ikamjv5q.fsf@gmail.com/
> resolved as noop.
>
> Is the above assessment correct?
> Beside (3) is there anything you'd like to change or should we go with v2?

I think there were also a couple nits on the selftests and at
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87qzpak4wc.fsf@gmail.com/. Let me send a v3
tomorrow morning with all the small things and the acks :)