From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Quan Sun <2022090917019@std.uestc.edu.cn>
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, bpf@vger.kernel.org, dddddd@hust.edu.cn,
M202472210@hust.edu.cn, dzm91@hust.edu.cn,
hust-os-kernel-patches@googlegroups.com, ast@kernel.org,
andrii@kernel.org, jiayuan.chen@linux.dev
Subject: Re: Infinite Recursion / Kernel Stack Overflow in bpf_skops_hdr_opt_len() via TCP_NODELAY setsockopt
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:55:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad0Row2av871JSJL@devvm17672.vll0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d1d523c9-6901-4454-a183-94462b8f3e4e@std.uestc.edu.cn>
On 04/13, Quan Sun wrote:
> Our fuzzing found a Stack Guard Page hit / Infinite Recursion vulnerability
> in the Linux TCP BPF Subsystem. The issue is triggered when a
> `BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS` program is attached and uses the `bpf_setsockopt()`
> helper inside the `BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB` callback to set
> `TCP_NODELAY` on the associated socket. This creates a logical loop that
> unconditionally pushes pending frames and re-invokes the same option-length
> BPF callback until the kernel stack overflows.
>
> Reported-by: Quan Sun <2022090917019@std.uestc.edu.cn>
> Reported-by: Yinhao Hu <dddddd@hust.edu.cn>
> Reported-by: Kaiyan Mei <M202472210@hust.edu.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>
>
> ## Root Cause
>
> This vulnerability is caused by a semantic loop created by mixing BPF TCP
> hooks tightly bounded to transmission paths with auxiliary socket state
> mutations like TCP Nagle transitions.
>
> 1. A user loads a `BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS` program and attaches it to a
> cgroup via `BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS`.
> 2. The program intercepts `BPF_SOCK_OPS_ACTIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB` or
> `BPF_SOCK_OPS_PASSIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB` events and sets the
> `BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB_FLAG` on the socket to enable custom TCP
> header options injection.
> 3. During the standard TCP frame transmission process (e.g., when sending
> data), the kernel needs to calculate the header's precise length. To
> retrieve the size of the injected option, `tcp_established_options()`
> invokes `bpf_skops_hdr_opt_len()`, which correctly triggers the
> `BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB` callback inside the BPF program.
> 4. Inside this callback, the malicious BPF program uses the
> `bpf_setsockopt()` helper function to force `TCP_NODELAY`.
> 5. Down in the kernel, setting `TCP_NODELAY` alters the connection context.
> Doing so invokes `__tcp_sock_set_nodelay()`, which unconditionally calls
> `tcp_push_pending_frames()` to immediately dispatch any packets that were
> previously waiting under the Nagle algorithm logic.
> 6. The recursive sub-call to `tcp_push_pending_frames()` initiates packet
> building again, causing a cascading invocation of
> `tcp_established_options()` -> `bpf_skops_hdr_opt_len()` ->
> `BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB` -> `bpf_setsockopt()` ->
> `tcp_push_pending_frames()`...
> 7. Without a depth limit or re-entrancy blocking condition on these socket
> callbacks, the repetitive nesting rapidly exhausts the kernel stack
> boundaries, pushing past the limits (hitting the `stack guard page`). The
> result is an immediate kernel panic leading to Denial of Service.
>
> #### Execution Flow Visualization
>
> ```text
> Vulnerability Execution Flow
> |
> |--- 1. `BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB` BPF Handler Executed
> | |\
> | | `-- `bpf_setsockopt(..., SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, ...)`
> | |
> |--- 2. `do_tcp_setsockopt()` called by BPF Helper
> | |\
> | | `-- `__tcp_sock_set_nodelay()`
> | | |
> | | `-- `tcp_push_pending_frames()` (Immediate TCP transmission)
> | |
> |--- 3. Context switches to Frame Packaging
> | |\
> | | `-- `tcp_current_mss()`
> | | |
> | | `-- `tcp_established_options()`
> | |
> |--- 4. TCP Header calls BPF back again for size computation
> | |\
> | | `-- `bpf_skops_hdr_opt_len()`
> | | |
> | | `-- Invokes BPF Callback: `BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB`
> | | |
> | | `-- (Reverts to Step 1 directly) Infinite recursion depth.
> <==== KERNEL PANIC
> ```
>
> ## Reproduction Steps
>
> 1. Load a `BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS` BPF program that:
> - Checks the `op` field in the `bpf_sock_ops` context.
> - If the `op` is `BPF_SOCK_OPS_ACTIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB` or
> `BPF_SOCK_OPS_PASSIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB`, calls the
> `bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set()` helper to enable the
> `BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB_FLAG`.
> - If the `op` is `BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB`, calls the
> `bpf_setsockopt()` helper to forcefully enable `TCP_NODELAY`.
> 2. Attach the loaded program to a chosen cgroup directory using
> `BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS`.
> 3. Trigger a standard TCP connection (e.g., using `connect()`) within the
> targeted cgroup to establish the socket and trigger the initial established
> callbacks.
> 4. Force a packet transmission (e.g., using `send()`). This forces the
> kernel to compute the MSS and invoke the option length callback.
> 5. The forced `TCP_NODELAY` inside the callback will trap the kernel in an
> infinite recursive call sequence traversing `tcp_push_pending_frames()` and
> `bpf_skops_hdr_opt_len()` until the stack overflows, leading to a stack
> guard page crash.
The easiest fix is to probably return early from tcp_push_pending_frames
when has_current_bpf_ctx()?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-13 12:12 Infinite Recursion / Kernel Stack Overflow in bpf_skops_hdr_opt_len() via TCP_NODELAY setsockopt Quan Sun
2026-04-13 15:55 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad0Row2av871JSJL@devvm17672.vll0.facebook.com \
--to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=2022090917019@std.uestc.edu.cn \
--cc=M202472210@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dddddd@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=dzm91@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=hust-os-kernel-patches@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox