From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
paul.chaignon@gmail.com, m.shachnai@gmail.com,
harishankar.vishwanathan@gmail.com, colin.i.king@gmail.com,
luis.gerhorst@fau.de, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for conditional jumps on same scalar register
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 10:14:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae64d43491a36fa5efc861be912a615348877d51.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251103063108.1111764-3-kafai.wan@linux.dev>
On Mon, 2025-11-03 at 14:31 +0800, KaFai Wan wrote:
> Add test cases to verify the correctness of the BPF verifier's branch analysis
> when conditional jumps are performed on the same scalar register. And make sure
> that JGT does not trigger verifier BUG.
>
> Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
> ---
Thank you for adding these.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
(but a comment needs a fix)
[...]
> +SEC("socket")
> +__description("jset on same register, scalar value unknown branch 3")
> +__msg("4: (b7) r0 = 0 {{.*}} R0=0")
> +__msg("6: (b7) r0 = 1 {{.*}} R0=1")
> +__success __log_level(2)
> +__flag(BPF_F_TEST_REG_INVARIANTS)
> +__naked void jset_on_same_register_5(void *ctx)
> +{
> + asm volatile(" \
> + /* range [-1;-1] */ \
^^
Typo, should be [-1;1].
> + call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \
> + r0 &= 0x2; \
> + r0 -= 1; \
> + if r0 & r0 goto l1_%=; \
> +l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
> + exit; \
> +l1_%=: r0 = 1; \
> + exit; \
> +" :
> + : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
> + : __clobber_all);
> +}
> +
> char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-03 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-03 6:31 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: Skip bounds adjustment for conditional jumps on same scalar register KaFai Wan
2025-11-03 6:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] " KaFai Wan
2025-11-03 18:09 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-11-03 6:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test " KaFai Wan
2025-11-03 18:14 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-11-04 1:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-04 2:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: Skip bounds adjustment " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae64d43491a36fa5efc861be912a615348877d51.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=harishankar.vishwanathan@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kafai.wan@linux.dev \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luis.gerhorst@fau.de \
--cc=m.shachnai@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox