From: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
To: Paul Houssel <paulhoussel2@gmail.com>
Cc: paul.houssel@orange.com, "Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
"T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
"Li RongQing" <lirongqing@baidu.com>,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: add tests to verify the enforcement of CONFIG_CGROUP_LSM_NUM
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 18:05:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aftm3Gu7e7joX9PA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260506150547.767315-3-paulhoussel2@gmail.com>
On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 05:05:47PM +0200, Paul Houssel wrote:
> Add a selftest that verifies the kernel correctly enforces
> CONFIG_CGROUP_LSM_NUM as the maximum number of concurrently attachable
> per-cgroup LSM hook slots.
>
> The BPF program side (progs/cgroup_lsm_num.c) defines 12 lsm_cgroup
> programs, each attached to a distinct LSM hook. The test side
> (prog_tests/cgroup_lsm_num.c) attempts to attach all 12 programs one by
> one to a cgroup, and verifies that exactly 10 succeed and 2 are rejected,
> matching the value of CONFIG_CGROUP_LSM_NUM set to 10 in the selftest
> Kconfig fragment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Houssel <paulhoussel2@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config | 1 +
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_lsm_num.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/cgroup_lsm_num.c | 46 ++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 107 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_lsm_num.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cgroup_lsm_num.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> index 24855381290d..e4c5dd86c640 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER=y
> CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y
> # CONFIG_BPF_UNPRIV_DEFAULT_OFF is not set
> CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF=y
> +CONFIG_CGROUP_LSM_NUM=10
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_HMAC=y
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256=y
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API=y
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_lsm_num.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_lsm_num.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1c5825c6c3d0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_lsm_num.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2026 Orange */
> +
> +/*
> + * Test that the kernel enforces CONFIG_CGROUP_LSM_NUM as the maximum
> + * number of concurrently used per-cgroup LSM hook slots.
> + *
> + * - load a BPF object with 12 programs each on a distinct lsm_cgroup hook
> + * - attach them one by one via bpf_program__attach_cgroup()
> + * - at some point the slots are exhausted and attachment fails
> + * - verify that 10 succeed attachment and 2 fail
> + */
> +
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf.h>
> +
> +#include "cgroup_lsm_num.skel.h"
> +#include "cgroup_helpers.h"
> +
> +void test_cgroup_lsm_num(void)
> +{
> + struct cgroup_lsm_num *skel = NULL;
> + struct bpf_program *prog;
> + int cgroup_fd = -1;
> + int attached = 0;
> + int failed = 0;
> +
> + cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/cgroup_lsm_num");
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "join_cgroup"))
> + return;
> +
> + skel = cgroup_lsm_num__open_and_load();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_and_load"))
> + goto out;
> +
> + bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, skel->obj) {
> + struct bpf_link *link;
> +
> + link = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(prog, cgroup_fd);
> + if (!link) {
> + if (errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
> + test__skip();
> + goto out;
> + }
> + failed++;
> + } else {
> + attached++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + // CONFIG_CGROUP_LSM_NUM set to 10
> + // -> 10 programs shall be attached
> + ASSERT_EQ(attached, 10, "at least one attached");
> + // -> 2 programs shall be rejected
> + ASSERT_EQ(failed, 2, "limit was enforced");
> +
> +out:
> + close(cgroup_fd);
> + cgroup_lsm_num__destroy(skel);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cgroup_lsm_num.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cgroup_lsm_num.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..662aee2283c2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cgroup_lsm_num.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2026 Orange */
> +
> +/*
> + * 12 LSM programs with lsm_cgroup attachment type, each on a distinct LSM
> + * hook. Used by prog_tests/cgroup_lsm_num.c to verify that the kernel
> + * enforces the CONFIG_CGROUP_LSM_NUM limit on unique per-cgroup LSM hook
> + * slots. With CONFIG_CGROUP_LSM_NUM set to 10, 10 shall be attached and 2
> + * rejected.
> + */
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +
> +#define LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(name, hook) \
> + SEC("lsm_cgroup/" #hook) \
> + int BPF_PROG(name) { return 1; }
> +
> +
> +LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(hook0, socket_create)
> +
> +LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(hook1, socket_post_create)
> +
> +LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(hook2, socket_socketpair)
> +
> +LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(hook3, socket_bind)
> +
> +LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(hook4, socket_connect)
> +
> +LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(hook5, socket_listen)
> +
> +LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(hook6, socket_accept)
> +
> +LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(hook7, socket_sendmsg)
> +
> +LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(hook8, socket_recvmsg)
> +
> +LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(hook9, socket_getsockname)
> +
> +LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(hook10, socket_getpeername)
> +
> +LSM_CGROUP_HOOK(hook11, socket_shutdown)
Please remove all the unnecessary newlines. One empty line after the
macro definition is enough :)
> +
> --
> 2.54.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 15:05 [PATCH v3 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_CGROUP_LSM_NUM to render BPF_LSM_CGROUP attachment limit configurable Paul Houssel
2026-05-06 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] bpf: render CGROUP_LSM_NUM configurable as a KConfig Paul Houssel
2026-05-06 15:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-06 16:11 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-05-06 21:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-07 16:39 ` Paul Houssel
2026-05-08 22:16 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-06 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: add tests to verify the enforcement of CONFIG_CGROUP_LSM_NUM Paul Houssel
2026-05-06 16:05 ` Paul Chaignon [this message]
2026-05-06 21:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-06 16:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_CGROUP_LSM_NUM to render BPF_LSM_CGROUP attachment limit configurable Paul Chaignon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aftm3Gu7e7joX9PA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=paul.houssel@orange.com \
--cc=paulhoussel2@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox