BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
To: Zhenzhong Wu <jt26wzz@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, menglong8.dong@gmail.com, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	shung-hsi.yu@suse.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com,
	tamird@kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 6.6.y v3 0/4] bpf: linked scalar precision fixes
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:51:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajCB9jXBzPyaDNSQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1781194510.git.jt26wzz@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 12:58:37AM +0800, Zhenzhong Wu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This v3 targets 6.6.y and changes the backport strategy based on review
> feedback on v2.

[...]

> Relevant QEMU selftest results on 6.6.y with this backport:
> 
>   verifier_scalar_ids passed all 18 subtests, including the newly
>   backported linked-scalar precision tests and the related
>   check_ids_in_regsafe tests.

The first patch in this backport series is actually breaking the
"precise: test 1" selftest from test_verifier. You can see the full
error at [1]. I haven't yet checked if it's the test or the backport
that needs to be adjusted.

1: https://github.com/shunghsiyu/libbpf/actions/runs/27575831217/job/81523786835

> 
> Thanks to Shung-Hsi Yu for reviewing v2 and suggesting the upstream
> linked-scalar precision series as the preferred backport direction.
> 
> Eduard Zingerman (4):
>   bpf: Track equal scalars history on per-instruction level
>   bpf: Remove mark_precise_scalar_ids()
>   selftests/bpf: Tests for per-insn sync_linked_regs() precision
>     tracking
>   selftests/bpf: Update comments find_equal_scalars->sync_linked_regs
> 
>  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h                  |   4 +
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         | 367 +++++++++++-------
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_scalar_ids.c | 253 ++++++++----
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c |   4 +-
>  .../bpf/progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c    |   2 +-
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c  |   2 +-
>  6 files changed, 417 insertions(+), 215 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: 924b4a879cbb75aef37c160b955b92f6894b11a4
> -- 
> 2.43.0

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-14 16:58 [PATCH stable 6.6.y v3 0/4] bpf: linked scalar precision fixes Zhenzhong Wu
2026-06-14 16:58 ` [PATCH stable 6.6.y v3 1/4] bpf: Track equal scalars history on per-instruction level Zhenzhong Wu
2026-06-14 17:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-14 16:58 ` [PATCH stable 6.6.y v3 2/4] bpf: Remove mark_precise_scalar_ids() Zhenzhong Wu
2026-06-14 17:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-14 16:58 ` [PATCH stable 6.6.y v3 3/4] selftests/bpf: Tests for per-insn sync_linked_regs() precision tracking Zhenzhong Wu
2026-06-14 17:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-14 16:58 ` [PATCH stable 6.6.y v3 4/4] selftests/bpf: Update comments find_equal_scalars->sync_linked_regs Zhenzhong Wu
2026-06-15 14:02 ` [PATCH stable 6.6.y v3 0/4] bpf: linked scalar precision fixes Sasha Levin
2026-06-15 22:51 ` Paul Chaignon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajCB9jXBzPyaDNSQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jt26wzz@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tamird@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox