From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched_ext: Avoid flooding the log with deprecation warnings
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 13:58:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajvGeVwE-kNhrRHu@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624-scx_warning-v2-1-07d0d48b0d01@debian.org>
Hi Breno,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 02:27:43AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> The deprecation notices for direct p->scx.slice/dsq_vtime writes and for
> ops->cpu_acquire/release() use plain pr_warn(), so they repeat on every
> scheduler (re)load and can flood the kernel log.
>
> The slice/dsq_vtime notice is the worst offender: it is emitted from the
> BPF verifier's btf_struct_access callback, which is re-evaluated as the
> verifier explores program paths, so a single scheduler load can print it
> many times -- hundreds of lines on some hosts, dozens within the same
> second.
>
> Switch both notices to pr_warn_ratelimited() so each deprecation is still
> reported but bursts no longer spam the log, and add the missing newline
> to the slice/dsq_vtime message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
-Andrea
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Switch both deprecation notices from pr_warn_once() to
> pr_warn_ratelimited() (Christian, Andrea)
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260623-scx_warning-v1-1-14bf218f4bd9@debian.org
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> index 691d53fe0f648..d62b93f48a854 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> @@ -6988,7 +6988,7 @@ static int validate_ops(struct scx_sched *sch, const struct sched_ext_ops *ops)
> * run past the BPF allocation. Skip for cid-form.
> */
> if (!sch->is_cid_type && (ops->cpu_acquire || ops->cpu_release))
> - pr_warn("ops->cpu_acquire/release() are deprecated, use sched_switch TP instead\n");
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("ops->cpu_acquire/release() are deprecated, use sched_switch TP instead\n");
>
> /*
> * Sub-scheduler support is tied to the cid-form struct_ops. A sub-sched
> @@ -7806,7 +7806,7 @@ static int bpf_scx_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
> off + size <= offsetofend(struct task_struct, scx.slice)) ||
> (off >= offsetof(struct task_struct, scx.dsq_vtime) &&
> off + size <= offsetofend(struct task_struct, scx.dsq_vtime))) {
> - pr_warn("sched_ext: Writing directly to p->scx.slice/dsq_vtime is deprecated, use scx_bpf_task_set_slice/dsq_vtime()");
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("sched_ext: Writing directly to p->scx.slice/dsq_vtime is deprecated, use scx_bpf_task_set_slice/dsq_vtime()\n");
> return SCALAR_VALUE;
> }
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: 4e5dfb7c84012007c3c7061126491bbc92d71bf1
> change-id: 20260623-scx_warning-0df49c442afb
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 9:27 [PATCH v2] sched_ext: Avoid flooding the log with deprecation warnings Breno Leitao
2026-06-24 11:58 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajvGeVwE-kNhrRHu@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox