BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, andrii@kernel.org,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, liamwisehart@meta.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	pabeni@redhat.com, song@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, clm@meta.com,
	ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Add ksock kfuncs
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 17:28:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <akvJpSXmBOn88GtV@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <268078861c26e02c25e9e882bccc607bedf580ae3c1d7e06562c48b85450f1a7@mail.kernel.org>

On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 10:30:04AM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/core/bpf_ksock.c b/net/core/bpf_ksock.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..8bde734bc917
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/net/core/bpf_ksock.c
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > @@ -0,0 +1,516 @@
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > +static int __init bpf_ksock_kfunc_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +	const struct btf_id_dtor_kfunc bpf_ksock_dtors[] = {
> > +		{
> > +			.btf_id = bpf_ksock_dtor_ids[0],
> > +			.kfunc_btf_id = bpf_ksock_dtor_ids[1],
> > +		},
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	ret = register_pernet_subsys(&bpf_ksock_net_ops);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL,
> > +					&ksock_init_kfunc_set);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		unregister_pernet_subsys(&bpf_ksock_net_ops);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL,
> > +					&ksock_kfunc_set);
> > +	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM,
> > +					       &ksock_kfunc_set);
> > +	return ret = ret ?: register_btf_id_dtor_kfuncs(bpf_ksock_dtors,
> > +						 ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_ksock_dtors),
> > +						 THIS_MODULE);
>                                 ^^^^
> 
> This isn't a bug, but in the final return statement the assignment
> to ret looks like a dead store since the value is returned right
> away. Could this just be:
> 
>     return ret ?: register_btf_id_dtor_kfuncs(bpf_ksock_dtors,
>                                               ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_ksock_dtors),
>                                               THIS_MODULE);

Indeed, this is relic of changes trying to get the cleanup part right,
see the other message from sashiko on the same patch.

> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +late_initcall(bpf_ksock_kfunc_init);
> 
> 
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
> 
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/28783010022


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  9:35 [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] Introduce bpf_ksock Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] net: Add __sys_connect_socket() helper Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Add ksock kfuncs Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 10:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 15:42     ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 10:30   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-06 15:28     ` Mahe Tardy [this message]
2026-07-06 16:58   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-06 17:26     ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 20:21       ` Amery Hung
2026-07-06 21:02       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-06 22:50         ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-07  9:41           ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 21:33   ` Amery Hung
2026-07-07  9:48     ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 23:01   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-07 10:06     ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] selftests/bpf: Add ksock kfunc test Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 10:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 16:11     ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 10:16   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-06 15:27     ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add ksock LSM recursion test Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add ksock net ns quota tests Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add ksock test for async callback guard Mahe Tardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=akvJpSXmBOn88GtV@gmail.com \
    --to=mahe.tardy@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=liamwisehart@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox