BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Zihan Xi <zihanx@nebusec.ai>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	magnus.karlsson@intel.com,  maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com,
	sdf@fomichev.me, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	 pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net,  hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	vega@nebusec.ai
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/1] xsk: account ring allocations to memcg
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:02:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amz-5UfOV4OZuj3C@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731164623.4694-2-zihanx@nebusec.ai>

On 07/31, Zihan Xi wrote:
> AF_XDP rings are allocated from setsockopt() and can be mapped into user
> space.  The shared xskq_create() helper allocates the ring backing memory,
> but the user-controlled and long-lived allocation is not charged as kmem
> to the allocating memory cgroup.
> 
> The current implementation uses vmalloc_user(), which allocates the
> backing pages with GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO.  Use the same VM_USERMAP
> vmalloc path, but pass GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT so the ring backing pages are
> attributed to memcg/kmem and can be constrained by existing cgroup memory
> limits.  This keeps the existing zeroing and mmap semantics while avoiding
> AF_XDP-specific optmem or RLIMIT_MEMLOCK accounting.
> 
> Fixes: 423f38329d26 ("xsk: add umem fill queue support and mmap")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Vega <vega@nebusec.ai>
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.4
> Signed-off-by: Zihan Xi <zihanx@nebusec.ai>
> ---
> changes in v3:
>   - drop the v2 RLIMIT_MEMLOCK / user->locked_vm accounting approach
>     after review feedback
>   - switch the AF_XDP ring backing allocation to the memcg/kmem model by
>     using a VM_USERMAP vmalloc path with GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT
>   - include <asm/shmparam.h> explicitly for SHMLBA, matching the
>     vmalloc implementation's dependency
>   - retarget Fixes to 423f38329d26, the original mmapable queue
>     allocation that introduced the missing accounting root-cause fact
>   - v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260730153832.11238-1-zihanx@nebusec.ai/
> changes in v2:
>   - replace the socket optmem limit proposal with RLIMIT_MEMLOCK /
>     user->locked_vm accounting via mm_account_pinned_pages()
>   - drop the earlier socket/pool lifetime coupling changes and keep the
>     final code diff limited to xsk_queue.c and xsk_queue.h
>   - retarget Fixes to 423f38329d26, the original mmapable queue
>     allocation that introduced the missing resource boundary
>   - v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1785313094.git.zihanx@nebusec.ai/
>  net/xdp/xsk_queue.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

From Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst:

  * Untrusted allocations triggered from userspace should be a subject
    of kmem accounting and must have ``__GFP_ACCOUNT`` bit set. There
    is the handy ``GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT`` shortcut for ``GFP_KERNEL``
    allocations that should be accounted.

I don't like that we are calling (seemingly) low level
__vmalloc_node_range, but commit 041de93ff86f ("mm: remove
vmalloc_user_node_flags") removed the previous wrapper and open-coded
it in bpf verifier, so I'm assuming calling __vmalloc_node_range here
is ok as well.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31 16:46 [PATCH net v3 0/1] xsk: account uncharged AF_XDP ring allocations to memcg Zihan Xi
2026-07-31 16:46 ` [PATCH net v3 1/1] xsk: account " Zihan Xi
2026-07-31 20:02   ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amz-5UfOV4OZuj3C@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com \
    --to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=vega@nebusec.ai \
    --cc=zihanx@nebusec.ai \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox