From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yw1-f172.google.com (mail-yw1-f172.google.com [209.85.128.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01A983E8342 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 21:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785966601; cv=none; b=WMPwknL3cW4P+rqTuIuSqFFJDka81d4fiw9ufF+9bf5bckldGm/WjZ2WtH3fE8wOluEXN+JDILLmSQMk+LVOItelUUJRD07FQwco0V1UoRzvhfzbZHJGsl+OXt+FmpLQYpUWK1CFxKpFkBQk4NU3kAoAeRS1wrxoFhtT+3N5fDE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785966601; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2G8EukvGpvx5Kksh0ypndv7QdvrNfaeHKcAGog1h//Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ejk1cZqzIjGewY7plW7a8kJscQgCROeGOUDjsGAkQwLG8OwpBl8CVp3hJ55k+qF/d5at2HH3PTRc9D04hshxpga7xrUrndn6J67lB5oNXQbzuC6+6x/sWWpZ/c9kFZRBin5mwMiWmog7wbYthIXzhUdhgni1mET5vPf2+NDpjyY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=rWol0ns6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rWol0ns6" Received: by mail-yw1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-81f64e8dfbcso22738357b3.2 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:49:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1785966599; x=1786571399; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=rcC/Ynktsu506yMWSubwFtSKyJoN9RzKxppS0dEA8wQ=; b=rWol0ns6QNt6Z98Iw7wlt+xas8bQM33SV335o4WahbxpDMb0qaqU+B6wuDRLbTypzZ +o6Ov8gQ8dKVHzVbZhaqP5LasTkSuel1lNilq3aCedii8K//DX9jECU5ZGPuRWpCdcbb eyXKhmsZ1m4dY7jQuC9gZCFGoP16YBKEYTIBGPi9IGsdKPpCh46DCPuhyk/hpmtjK0Ok xk25u798gTMLW3ZACLGWMVrzhzvocpeqibmZk66RGrBZt7FhGagyI7ZlxhTpHzj8wEYU Wy4obRowJi8mJkGuczOr7eCKMb91kp4d4E8nZm4pR+AWABEAby3r91btIk6IP4Q5oMCY dM6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1785966599; x=1786571399; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to:content-type; bh=rcC/Ynktsu506yMWSubwFtSKyJoN9RzKxppS0dEA8wQ=; b=ja8brEQuf1CdjVbzoRAYI/60cw0mdSQlB6crx7iRQHUy3SWaGqxCjfMJM4iO+VAyGG qJBzShKfkeKgaibMJ8PN4W3aLr0DojegUNsVvhSII7KBptCXtMDZzvrVGJBK/X50dlsh LjYO/66QzN3u9Zdr0EIRdtJC9b8imgQwW2UH9uGJWrINo5qYGg54nqXQplGAB1V5CIbE xzJYbTm/XKOw9DDepEWO+d9+rNAc12544B6rLr7VMsFv/lwDYcACwNnRbhSbyGEmlsUs KLJWCC/J2kG8l7fmeoLUrIX+0yr/d7KdrlvWcGit++FuxgnMF2P2no7ZXQEpWG9LV6AL oKmA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Ro06T/3UOp8qFoY7jdzgyvJED8zEk3V4s2st9WXzFvi/Zd8bJreIqpnKPmlYIwOtPnOohc=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyfyA4Pozm420XhG+oHo09/ciQur/1rOjAf3i3mek24CAXnb9MO TenBq9rGmsOIjU5YtqOfLdHYXaGs7+1NFfWxHmzeTc94Q37XVqOrLkz9 X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD12YsjJxWc76TPNmSYEaSCqTvlI+Mn9YSji0tl2tGCFE8ONy/IDxevTH93x7XQD gKrNO0gKdWgqhhlBDi2NbssWRqBAswYIwt8H33ZtTIMVzqDQvFmT7R1490mVZD4dRSK274Yugde 9w90UfCnY47a3W1jBqEVVTQA1jEmWctJr9I2XqWVsgleAzx99o1820VG6+JgpLtrOWXdRN8nBhl zxbHW/kxoJ9NbvHfttB0OWWAu9JCcys7nCXPdaeYEodGlFiWbkS11rFqBUbVFXPohO6lxyHhE1c Si/LyABTsi7SK8ceK2d621W1cVdOejLwSVBO5Qswl7R2JSZPPHZMakpPY309mTWsOk2FYsM8PGH +D8wXMmg5UOMguC96boYijH+KsnmCREWhdbMMP+TD00kP8gXKkHRr1n/ChBNbkZoIGvE3oRlahB Yde0ukp2102T/dXzjhLlDe278qRnjxF9q7u3iF4Oj2h3bPZ7QH/Q6u4aVunVTj5OOa5fZuIvvUR z8n1sUbrihMauL904KtQoA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:7106:b0:81e:d656:9909 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-8201f0c1483mr63263087b3.1.1785966598816; Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zenbox ([2600:1700:18fb:6011:7d5b:ac23:cde9:3664]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 00721157ae682-82013452634sm28729377b3.34.2026.08.05.14.49.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 17:49:57 -0400 From: Justin Suess To: Paul Moore Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, mic@digikod.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, gnoack@google.com, jack@suse.cz, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, martin.lau@linux.dev, m@maowtm.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/13] BPF interface for applying Landlock rulesets Message-ID: References: <20260731022047.189137-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 05:37:07PM -0400, Justin Suess wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 04:30:39PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 10:21 PM Justin Suess wrote: > > [...] > > As you may, or may not have seen, there is currently an ongoing debate > > regarding the location of LSM kfuncs that will impact this patchset. > > Sadly, we don't appear to be approaching an agreement on this issue > > which introduces some additional risk to this patchset. We'll have to > > see how that ends up, but I just wanted you to be aware of the > > situation. > > Quick aside question: Would security/bpf/ be a better place for these > type of kfuncs? > *lsm-specific kfuncs, sorry should have been more clear. Justin > security/bpf/bpf_lsm_kfuncs.c could be for LSM framework kfuncs, > and each LSM could maintain their own security/bpf/_kfuncs.c > for kfuncs dealing with lsm-specific types. > > One issue with just security/ is it's not CONFIG_SECURITY_BPF. But > security/bpf is. Right now security/bpf only has hooks.c so it's free > real estate. > > That way things are more greppable... (important!) and we can have > proper MAINTAINERS entries per file so emails get routed properly. > > (linux-security-module, bpf, and whatever lsm list) > > Justin