From: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/15] i40e: prepare for XDP metadata ops support
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2026 04:00:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anYnt4a74hohZ-M1@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806213617.56A711F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On 08/06 21:36, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [Critical] Use-After-Free in the AF_XDP Zero-Copy receive path due to stagnant index variable on error.
> --
>
> --- Patch [10]: [PATCH net-next 10/15] i40e: prepare for XDP metadata ops support ---
> commit cf380b8d06da010c94723db1eb6af6df8fb0fdc8
> Author: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
>
> i40e: prepare for XDP metadata ops support
>
> This commit introduces struct i40e_xdp_buff to wrap an xdp_buff alongside
> a pointer to an i40e_rx_desc. It passes the RX descriptor to XDP kfuncs
> and adds bounds checking in the AF_XDP Zero-Copy path using
> XSK_CHECK_PRIV_TYPE.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
> > index 9f47388eaba53..51a05ce4c7ce8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -472,6 +482,8 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget)
> > if (i40e_is_non_eop(rx_ring, rx_desc))
> > continue;
> >
> > + xsk_buff_to_i40e_ctx(first)->desc = rx_desc;
> > +
>
> [Severity: Critical]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but does this function have a use-after-free
> in its error handling path?
>
> If xsk_buff_add_frag() fails earlier in the loop, it calls
IIUC, I40E_MAX_CHAINED_RX_BUFFERS (5) limits a packet to one head and at
most four frags. Since xsk_buff_add_frag() fails only when nr_frags ==
MAX_SKB_FRAGS, which is at least 17, this path is unreachable for a
valid i40e RX chain.
However, the UAF scenario looks valid if it does fail, so the
pre-existing error may still be worth fixing.
> xsk_buff_free(first) and breaks out of the loop without advancing
> next_to_clean:
>
> if (!first)
> first = bi;
> else if (!xsk_buff_add_frag(first, bi)) {
> xsk_buff_free(first);
> break;
> }
>
> On the subsequent NAPI poll, because next_to_process != next_to_clean,
> the code loads the freed buffer pointer from the stale next_to_clean
> index:
>
> if (next_to_process != next_to_clean)
> first = *i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, next_to_clean);
>
> Could this cause the next packet to be built using a freed buffer?
>
> > xdp_res = i40e_run_xdp_zc(rx_ring, first, xdp_prog);
> > i40e_handle_xdp_result_zc(rx_ring, first, rx_desc, &rx_packets,
> > &rx_bytes, xdp_res, &failure);
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805213541.2281287-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260805213541.2281287-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
2026-08-05 21:35 ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] i40e: prepare for XDP metadata ops support Tony Nguyen
2026-08-06 21:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 19:00 ` Kohei Enju [this message]
2026-08-05 21:35 ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] i40e: add support for bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash() Tony Nguyen
2026-08-05 21:35 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] i40e: add support for bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_vlan_tag() Tony Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anYnt4a74hohZ-M1@x1 \
--to=kohei@enjuk.jp \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox