From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@kernel.org>,
"Neal Cardwell" <ncardwell@google.com>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@google.com>,
"Tenzin Ukyab" <ukyab@berkeley.edu>,
"Clément Léger" <cleger@meta.com>,
"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 06/10] bpf: tcp: Introduce bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq().
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 15:06:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asVwyEeHdtEqH5Ya@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006192601.1875100-7-kuniyu@google.com>
On 10/06, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> Waking up a thread per packet is expensive when an application
> processes variable-length frames (e.g., RPC) that span multiple
> packets.
>
> SO_RCVLOWAT can defer wakeups, but because the frame size is
> encoded in a fixed-size descriptor at the start of each frame,
> the application has to:
>
> 1. wake up and recv() the descriptor,
> 2. raise SO_RCVLOWAT to the payload size via setsockopt(),
> 3. wake up and recv() the payload, and
> 4. reset SO_RCVLOWAT back to the descriptor size via
> setsockopt() for the next frame.
>
> This requires an extra wakeup and two setsockopt() syscalls
> for every single RPC frame.
>
> With SOCKMAP, we can parse skb and suppress wakeups in kernel,
> but SOCKMAP adds overhead and also kills zerocopy.
>
> Let's add lighter-weight opt-in callbacks to bpf_tcp_ops to
> replace that.
>
> .enqueue_rcvq(): invoked when TCP stack enqueues skb to
> sk->sk_receive_queue
>
> .dequeue_rcvq(): invoked in tcp_cleanup_rbuf() after data
> is dequeued from sk->sk_receive_queue
>
> Those callbacks can be enabled on a per-socket basis by
> bpf_tcp_ops_set_flags():
>
> bpf_tcp_ops_set_flags((struct tcp_sock *)sk,
> BPF_TCP_OPS_FLAG_RCVQ, 0);
>
> Later, we will add a new kfunc to adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat from
> these callbacks.
>
> This will allow the bpf_tcp_ops prog to parse each skb and
> dynamically adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat to suppress unnecessary EPOLLIN
> wakeups until sufficient data is available in the receive queue.
>
> The placement of bpf_tcp_ops_call() in tcp_ofo_queue() and
> tcp_fastopen_add_skb() is chosen to provide the same snapshot
> as tcp_queue_rcv().
>
> For example, if bpf_tcp_ops_call() were called before updating
> TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq in tcp_fastopen_add_skb(), BPF prog would
> need an extra branch for the unlikely TFO case to strip SYN.
>
> In addition, the TCP stack can queue overlapping skbs into recvq.
> Once rcv_nxt is updated with a new skb, BPF prog can no longer
> infer the previous rcv_nxt from skb->len.
>
> Lastly, dequeue_rcvq() is placed in tcp_cleanup_rbuf() rather
> than __tcp_cleanup_rbuf() so that it is not called for sockets
> in SOCKMAP, where calling sk->sk_data_ready() from the new
> kfunc would otherwise trigger infinite recursion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 19:24 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 00/10] bpf: Add bpf_tcp_ops hooks for TCP AutoLOWAT Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 01/10] bpf: tcp: Convert deny-list for bpf_{get,set}sockopt() to allow-list Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 23:09 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 02/10] bpf: tcp: Add a new per-socket flag and kfunc for bpf_tcp_ops Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 22:04 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-06 23:10 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 03/10] selftest: bpf: Use bpf_tcp_ops_set_flags() in bpf_tcp_ops_hdr.c Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 22:04 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-06 23:12 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 04/10] bpf: tcp: Guard fast-path bpf_tcp_ops_call() under per-socket flag Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 22:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-06 23:25 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-07 2:48 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-07 22:36 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-08 2:10 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 05/10] bpf: tcp: Check BPF_SOCK_OPS_TEST_FLAG() after cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_SOCK_OPS) Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 20:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-06 22:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-07 22:38 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 06/10] bpf: tcp: Introduce bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 22:06 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-10-06 23:26 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 07/10] tcp: Split out __tcp_set_rcvlowat() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-07 22:43 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 08/10] bpf: mptcp: Don't support BPF_TCP_OPS_FLAG_RCVQ Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 22:06 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-07 22:43 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 09/10] bpf: tcp: Add kfunc to adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 19:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 23:06 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-07 23:21 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-07 23:42 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 10/10] selftest: bpf: Add test for bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 19:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 22:06 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-07 13:11 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 00/10] bpf: Add bpf_tcp_ops hooks for TCP AutoLOWAT Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asVwyEeHdtEqH5Ya@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com \
--to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cleger@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=ukyab@berkeley.edu \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox