From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Federico Di Pierro <nierro92@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 bpf-next 1/8] bpf: Honor const on generic kfunc memory arguments
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 14:52:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <au3brpNZG2nANnha@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzbdBLb1cBeF0an386k=CmMYKdz=Or5mSjzy_F5SFOwsxg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 04:34:44PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
SNIP
> > +/* A kfunc only reads through 'const T *arg'. The compiler enforces it. */
> > +static enum bpf_type_flag kfunc_arg_mem_flag(const struct btf *btf,
> > + const struct btf_param *arg)
> > +{
> > + const struct btf_type *t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, arg->type, NULL);
> > + u32 id, ref_id;
> > +
> > + btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, t->type, &ref_id);
> > + for (id = t->type; id != ref_id; id = t->type) {
> > + t = btf_type_by_id(btf, id);
> > + if (btf_kind(t) == BTF_KIND_CONST)
> > + return MEM_RDONLY;
> > + }
>
> quite weird implementation, skip modifier, and then re-walk
> modifiers... while not have a loop from t->type while
> btf_type_is_modifier() and if you find btf_kind(t) == BTF_KIND_CONST
> -> return true?
the intention was not to introduce another helper with modifier
classification, the tradeoff is 2 loops [1]
jirka
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/DMLRV3E28SC8.3FJZXLBLZI4DD@gmail.com/
>
>
> > + return MEM_WRITE;
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool is_kfunc_arg_constant(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_param *arg)
> > {
> > return btf_param_match_suffix(btf, arg, "__k");
> > @@ -13618,7 +13634,8 @@ static int resolve_func_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> > PTR_ERR(resolve_ret));
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > - *arg_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_FIXED_SIZE | MEM_WRITE |
> > + *arg_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_FIXED_SIZE |
> > + kfunc_arg_mem_flag(meta->btf, &args[arg]) |
> > (*arg_type & (PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_UNINIT));
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -14170,7 +14187,7 @@ get_kfunc_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta,
> > reg_arg_name(env, argno), btf_type_str(ref_t), ref_tname);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > - arg_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_WRITE;
> > + arg_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | kfunc_arg_mem_flag(meta->btf, &args[arg]);
> > } else if (btf_type_is_struct(ref_t))
> > /* A pointer to a struct without a size argument is classified as ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID */
> > arg_type = ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID;
> > @@ -14195,7 +14212,8 @@ get_kfunc_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > proto->arg_size[arg] = type_size;
> > - arg_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_FIXED_SIZE | MEM_WRITE;
> > + arg_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_FIXED_SIZE |
> > + kfunc_arg_mem_flag(meta->btf, &args[arg]);
> > }
> >
> > if (is_kfunc_arg_uninit(meta->btf, &args[arg]))
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 10:23 [PATCHv3 bpf-next 0/8] bpf: Add user memory kfuncs Jiri Olsa
2026-11-05 10:23 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 1/8] bpf: Honor const on generic kfunc memory arguments Jiri Olsa
2026-11-05 10:59 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-06 0:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-11-06 13:52 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2026-11-06 19:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-11-05 10:23 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 2/8] bpf: Add user memory kfuncs Jiri Olsa
2026-11-05 10:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 0:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-11-06 13:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-11-05 10:23 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 3/8] selftests/bpf: Add get_procmap_info helper Jiri Olsa
2026-11-05 10:23 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 4/8] selftests/bpf: Test const kfunc memory arguments Jiri Olsa
2026-11-05 10:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 10:23 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 5/8] selftests/bpf: Test user memory mmap kfuncs Jiri Olsa
2026-11-05 10:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 10:23 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 6/8] selftests/bpf: Test user memory page exec Jiri Olsa
2026-11-05 10:23 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 7/8] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_copy_to_user kfunc Jiri Olsa
2026-11-05 10:23 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 8/8] selftests/bpf: Test user memory kfunc errors Jiri Olsa
2026-11-06 2:50 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 0/8] bpf: Add user memory kfuncs patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=au3brpNZG2nANnha@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=nierro92@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox