From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Zhiling Zou <zhilinz@nebusec.ai>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<magnus.karlsson@intel.com>, <sdf@fomichev.me>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<horms@kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<hawk@kernel.org>, <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <vega@nebusec.ai>,
<bjorn@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] xsk: validate consumer ring producer index
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 14:11:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auCi4nDJ1eiGx5hC@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2b51708a3ada3b12b986224ee8340ca7ef5b3be.1792654486.git.zhilinz@nebusec.ai>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2026 at 03:58:18PM +0800, Zhiling Zou wrote:
> __xskq_cons_peek() trusts the userspace-controlled producer index without
> checking that the producer-consumer distance fits in the ring. In
> __xp_alloc(), an invalid fill descriptor is consumed one at a time until
> the cached producer is reached. A one-entry ring with an invalid address
> and a forged producer index can therefore keep the kernel in this loop
> for billions of iterations in receive context.
>
> Treat producer values beyond the ring capacity as an empty queue. This
> bounds the consumer to the userspace-provided ring size and prevents the
> long loop.
>
> Fixes: c5ed924b54c8 ("xsk: Simplify the consumer ring access functions")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Vega <vega@nebusec.ai>
> Link: https://bugtracker.nebusec.ai/f/13760
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Zhiling Zou <zhilinz@nebusec.ai>
> ---
> net/xdp/xsk_queue.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> index 1bc42c8902f4b..315b656534749 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> @@ -344,6 +344,9 @@ static inline void __xskq_cons_peek(struct xsk_queue *q)
> {
> /* Refresh the local pointer */
> q->cached_prod = smp_load_acquire(&q->ring->producer); /* C, matches B */
> + /* A malformed producer must not make us consume beyond the ring. */
> + if (q->cached_prod - q->cached_cons > q->nentries)
> + q->cached_prod = q->cached_cons;
> }
>
> static inline void xskq_cons_get_entries(struct xsk_queue *q)
Clashiko says the proposed fix is not sufficient, see [0].
I am leaning towards Bjorn's suggestion to return NULL for invalid desc, which
would imply that the endless loop is pointless and could be removed from
__xp_alloc().
Thanks,
MF
[0]:
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH net 1/1] xsk: validate consumer ring producer index ---
commit f0f4eea504a1aeac9437d0c1f025a159991b7029
Author: Zhiling Zou <zhilinz@nebusec.ai>
xsk: validate consumer ring producer index
This commit adds a check to __xskq_cons_peek(). If the producer index is
more than nentries ahead of the cached consumer, the queue is treated as
empty. The goal is to stop __xp_alloc() from skipping invalid fill ring
descriptors for billions of iterations in receive context.
Link: https://bugtracker.nebusec.ai/f/13760
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> index 1bc42c8902f4..315b65653474 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> @@ -344,6 +344,9 @@ static inline void __xskq_cons_peek(struct xsk_queue *q)
> {
> /* Refresh the local pointer */
> q->cached_prod = smp_load_acquire(&q->ring->producer); /* C, matches B */
> + /* A malformed producer must not make us consume beyond the ring. */
> + if (q->cached_prod - q->cached_cons > q->nentries)
> + q->cached_prod = q->cached_cons;
> }
Does this fully prevent the long loop described in the commit message? The
commit message says:
Treat producer values beyond the ring capacity as an empty queue. This
bounds the consumer to the userspace-provided ring size and prevents the
long loop.
The new check limits each producer snapshot to nentries. Nothing limits the
total work done in a single __xp_alloc() call, though. When it hits invalid
descriptors, its loop only exits once the queue looks empty:
net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c:__xp_alloc() {
...
for (;;) {
if (!xskq_cons_peek_addr_unchecked(pool->fq, &addr)) {
pool->fq->queue_empty_descs++;
return NULL;
}
...
if (!ok) {
pool->fq->invalid_descs++;
xskq_cons_release(pool->fq);
continue;
}
break;
}
...
}
When cached_cons catches up with cached_prod, the peek does not end the
scan. It publishes the consumer index and reloads the producer:
net/xdp/xsk_queue.h:xskq_cons_peek_addr_unchecked() {
if (q->cached_prod == q->cached_cons)
xskq_cons_get_entries(q);
...
}
Here xskq_cons_get_entries() calls __xskq_cons_release(), which does a
smp_store_release() on ring->consumer, and then calls __xskq_cons_peek().
The loop is reached through __xsk_rcv()->xsk_buff_alloc()->xp_alloc()->
__xp_alloc(), or from a zero-copy driver's NAPI refill. There still seem to
be two ways to keep a CPU in it.
First, xsk_init_queue() only requires a non-zero power of two:
if (entries == 0 || *queue || !is_power_of_2(entries))
return -EINVAL;
So the fill ring can be very large, for example 2^26 u64 entries or more.
If such a ring is full of invalid addresses, one refresh still allows that
many iterations.
Second, a user thread can watch the published ring->consumer and set
producer = consumer + nentries / 2 each time. Each producer value the
kernel reads is then within nentries of cached_cons but never equal to it.
Every snapshot passes the new check, and the loop never sees an empty
queue.
xsk_create() only checks ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_RAW). So can an
unprivileged user namespace with its own netns still cause soft lockups or
RCU stalls in softirq context?
Would a per-call budget on skipped invalid entries in __xp_alloc() work
better here? For example, it could return NULL after at most nentries
skips. The batched xp_alloc_new_from_fq() path already limits its work
with xskq_cons_nb_entries(pool->fq, max).
Could the commit message also be updated, so stable backporters don't
assume this change closes the soft lockup?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-22 7:58 [PATCH net 0/1] xsk: validate fill-ring producer index Zhiling Zou
2026-10-22 7:58 ` [PATCH net 1/1] xsk: validate consumer ring " Zhiling Zou
2026-10-22 9:08 ` Magnus Karlsson
2026-10-23 7:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 14:28 ` Björn Töpel
2026-10-27 13:11 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-10-22 8:03 ` [PATCH net 0/1] xsk: validate fill-ring " netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-22 8:04 ` zhilin zou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auCi4nDJ1eiGx5hC@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=vega@nebusec.ai \
--cc=zhilinz@nebusec.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox