public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	"Przemek Kitszel" <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/16] idpf: fix Rx descriptor ready check barrier in splitq
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 18:10:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1255dff-91c4-4042-bb3d-78245065c669@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z8rHp046ELv2wrac@boxer>

From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 11:17:11 +0100

> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 05:21:21PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> No idea what the current barrier position was meant for. At that point,
>> nothing is read from the descriptor, only the pointer to the actual one
>> is fetched.
>> The correct barrier usage here is after the generation check, so that
>> only the first qword is read if the descriptor is not yet ready and we
>> need to stop polling. Debatable on coherent DMA as the Rx descriptor
>> size is <= cacheline size, but anyway, the current barrier position
>> only makes the codegen worse.
> 
> Makes sense:
> Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> 
> But you know the process... :P fixes should go to -net.

The thing's that it makes no difference for regular skb Rx, but with
ret != XDP_PASS it starts making issues. So yes, this is a fix, but
I don't think it should go separately.

> 
>>
>> Fixes: 3a8845af66ed ("idpf: add RX splitq napi poll support")
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 8 ++------
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Thanks,
Olek

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-12 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-05 16:21 [PATCH net-next 00/16] idpf: add XDP support Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 01/16] libeth: convert to netmem Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-06  0:13   ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-11 17:22     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-11 17:43       ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 02/16] libeth: support native XDP and register memory model Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 03/16] libeth: add a couple of XDP helpers (libeth_xdp) Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-11 14:05   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-17 15:26     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-19 16:19       ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-04-01 13:11         ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 13:38           ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 13:22     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 13:51       ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 04/16] libeth: add XSk helpers Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 10:15   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-12 17:03     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 05/16] idpf: fix Rx descriptor ready check barrier in splitq Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 10:17   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-12 17:10     ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 06/16] idpf: a use saner limit for default number of queues to allocate Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 10:32   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-12 17:22     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 07/16] idpf: link NAPIs to queues Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 10:28   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-03-12 17:16     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-18 17:10       ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 10:51   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-12 17:25     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 08/16] idpf: make complq cleaning dependent on scheduling mode Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 11:11   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-13 16:16     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 09/16] idpf: remove SW marker handling from NAPI Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 11:42   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-13 16:50     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 10/16] idpf: add support for nointerrupt queues Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 12:10   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-13 16:19     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 11/16] idpf: prepare structures to support XDP Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07  1:12   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-12 14:00     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 13:27   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-17 14:50     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-19 16:29       ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-04-08 13:42         ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 12/16] idpf: implement XDP_SETUP_PROG in ndo_bpf for splitq Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 14:16   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-17 14:58     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-19 16:23       ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 13/16] idpf: use generic functions to build xdp_buff and skb Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 14/16] idpf: add support for XDP on Rx Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-11 15:50   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-04-08 13:28     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 15:53       ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 15/16] idpf: add support for .ndo_xdp_xmit() Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-11 16:08   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-04-08 13:31     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 16/16] idpf: add XDP RSS hash hint Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-11 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 00/16] idpf: add XDP support Alexander Lobakin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b1255dff-91c4-4042-bb3d-78245065c669@intel.com \
    --to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.kubiak@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox