From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADCBC433EF for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236105AbhLMVvh (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:51:37 -0500 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:58474 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232880AbhLMVvh (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:51:37 -0500 Received: from sslproxy06.your-server.de ([78.46.172.3]) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1mwtEN-000BiG-Ur; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 22:51:35 +0100 Received: from [85.1.206.226] (helo=linux.home) by sslproxy06.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mwtEN-000S1w-P0; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 22:51:35 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] bpf: let bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action() report more info From: Daniel Borkmann To: Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , bpf@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Toke_H=c3=b8iland-J=c3=b8rgensen?= References: <1ac2941f-b751-9cf0-f0e3-ea0f245b7503@iogearbox.net> <70c5f1a6ecdc67586d108ab5ebed4be6febf8423.camel@redhat.com> <1685fbab-e4e1-5116-5148-fa7cd8f5879b@iogearbox.net> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 22:51:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1685fbab-e4e1-5116-5148-fa7cd8f5879b@iogearbox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.103.3/26385/Mon Dec 13 10:38:12 2021) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On 12/6/21 4:04 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 12/6/21 11:20 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote: [...] >> Yep, that would probably be better. Pleas let me know it you prefer a >> formal new version for the patch. > > Ok, I think no need, we can take care of it when applying. Done now, thanks Paolo!