From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/18] bpftool: Add btf enum64 support
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 14:10:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b59b2370-de7c-752b-1acb-6afe81550c92@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZcPVsKzx+abjJruRAeg++iod6YnTfBWGhUkyit6VsGPw@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/17/22 4:38 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 8:13 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add BTF_KIND_ENUM64 support.
>> For example, the following enum is defined in uapi bpf.h.
>> $ cat core.c
>> enum A {
>> BPF_F_INDEX_MASK = 0xffffffffULL,
>> BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU = BPF_F_INDEX_MASK,
>> BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK = (0xfffffULL << 32),
>> } g;
>> Compiled with
>> clang -target bpf -O2 -g -c core.c
>> Using bpftool to dump types and generate format C file:
>> $ bpftool btf dump file core.o
>> ...
>> [1] ENUM64 'A' size=8 vlen=3
>> 'BPF_F_INDEX_MASK' val=4294967295ULL
>> 'BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU' val=4294967295ULL
>> 'BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK' val=4503595332403200ULL
>> $ bpftool btf dump file core.o format c
>> ...
>> enum A {
>> BPF_F_INDEX_MASK = 4294967295ULL,
>> BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU = 4294967295ULL,
>> BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK = 4503595332403200ULL,
>> };
>> ...
>>
>> The 64bit value is represented properly in BTF and C dump.
>>
>> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
>> ---
>> tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
>> index a2c665beda87..9e5db870fe53 100644
>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static const char * const btf_kind_str[NR_BTF_KINDS] = {
>> [BTF_KIND_FLOAT] = "FLOAT",
>> [BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG] = "DECL_TAG",
>> [BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG] = "TYPE_TAG",
>> + [BTF_KIND_ENUM64] = "ENUM64",
>> };
>>
>> struct btf_attach_point {
>> @@ -228,10 +229,54 @@ static int dump_btf_type(const struct btf *btf, __u32 id,
>> if (json_output) {
>> jsonw_start_object(w);
>> jsonw_string_field(w, "name", name);
>> - jsonw_uint_field(w, "val", v->val);
>> + if (btf_kflag(t))
>> + jsonw_int_field(w, "val", v->val);
>> + else
>> + jsonw_uint_field(w, "val", v->val);
>> jsonw_end_object(w);
>> } else {
>> - printf("\n\t'%s' val=%u", name, v->val);
>> + if (btf_kflag(t))
>> + printf("\n\t'%s' val=%d", name, v->val);
>> + else
>> + printf("\n\t'%s' val=%u", name, v->val);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (json_output)
>> + jsonw_end_array(w);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + case BTF_KIND_ENUM64: {
>> + const struct btf_enum64 *v = btf_enum64(t);
>> + __u16 vlen = btf_vlen(t);
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + if (json_output) {
>> + jsonw_uint_field(w, "size", t->size);
>> + jsonw_uint_field(w, "vlen", vlen);
>> + jsonw_name(w, "values");
>> + jsonw_start_array(w);
>> + } else {
>> + printf(" size=%u vlen=%u", t->size, vlen);
>> + }
>> + for (i = 0; i < vlen; i++, v++) {
>> + const char *name = btf_str(btf, v->name_off);
>> + __u64 val = ((__u64)v->val_hi32 << 32) | v->val_lo32;
>> +
>> + if (json_output) {
>> + jsonw_start_object(w);
>> + jsonw_string_field(w, "name", name);
>
> forgot emitting kflag itself (both in bpftool and in selftests), let's
> add that for both enum and enum64?
will do. I will also check other places whether I missed or not.
>
>> + if (btf_kflag(t))
>> + jsonw_int_field(w, "val", val);
>> + else
>> + jsonw_uint_field(w, "val", val);
>> + jsonw_end_object(w);
>> + } else {
>> + if (btf_kflag(t))
>> + printf("\n\t'%s' val=%lldLL", name,
>> + (unsigned long long)val);
>> + else
>> + printf("\n\t'%s' val=%lluULL", name,
>> + (unsigned long long)val);
>> }
>> }
>> if (json_output)
>
> [...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-18 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-14 3:12 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/18] bpf: Add 64bit enum value support Yonghong Song
2022-05-14 3:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/18] bpf: Add btf enum64 support Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 0:06 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-14 3:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/18] libbpf: Permit 64bit relocation value Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 0:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-14 3:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/18] libbpf: Fix an error in 64bit relocation value computation Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 0:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-14 3:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/18] libbpf: Refactor btf__add_enum() for future code sharing Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 0:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-14 3:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/18] libbpf: Add enum64 parsing and new enum64 public API Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 0:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-14 3:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/18] libbpf: Add enum64 deduplication support Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 0:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-17 17:11 ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 22:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-14 3:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/18] libbpf: Add enum64 support for btf_dump Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 0:37 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-17 17:15 ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-14 3:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/18] libbpf: Add enum64 sanitization Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 23:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-18 21:08 ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-14 3:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/18] libbpf: Add enum64 support for bpf linking Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 23:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-14 3:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/18] libbpf: Add enum64 relocation support Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 23:32 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-18 21:09 ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-14 3:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/18] bpftool: Add btf enum64 support Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 23:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-18 21:10 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-05-14 3:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/18] selftests/bpf: Fix selftests failure Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 23:33 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-14 3:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/18] selftests/bpf: Test new enum kflag and enum64 API functions Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 23:40 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-18 21:12 ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-14 3:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/18] selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_ENUM64 unit tests Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 23:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-14 3:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/18] selftests/bpf: Test BTF_KIND_ENUM64 for deduplication Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 23:43 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-14 3:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/18] selftests/bpf: Add a test for enum64 value relocations Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 23:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-14 3:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 17/18] selftests/bpf: Clarify llvm dependency with possible selftest failures Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 23:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-14 3:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 18/18] docs/bpf: Update documentation for BTF_KIND_ENUM64 support Yonghong Song
2022-05-17 23:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-18 21:21 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b59b2370-de7c-752b-1acb-6afe81550c92@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox