From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-177.mta1.migadu.com (out-177.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A599F374CF for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.177 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706726706; cv=none; b=gkKCAk0WnaHkztCbbe+zu9D+z5fPbPoPCBkBW/M7FlsV2bIg2ckPYkOjvBvYAFGsjpm1AgBHpW/Tg6LL2L6RWJ2kAVBRY3PT+tRNv22mYEZObbztUJwfLQXpMKnMIsDVZH9lbaI4UHPUrrZHwZNCfXLvAvyPusUSIIRh37clXcg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706726706; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gSlRMppf4pD7dGbBJ4Xcpz4Z0gJW3xl5EDEUPITxqYk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ri4cDnT4WvczFgNungOzGrc7/pPwfgjpn3UYsLUJnx3h5/R2LbPCl7LZGOxXU5YlGSywjOOEkI6OgV3xCQYBg8cz3hiCQrgfrNTyCGEW9OoNIZJnB3PY49voyZ0w0chbOTp9Hh9Q7/lJ3XbsR9w77jeb3vami5cQkZpSq9auMtc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=O2d1AaLc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="O2d1AaLc" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1706726699; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gSlRMppf4pD7dGbBJ4Xcpz4Z0gJW3xl5EDEUPITxqYk=; b=O2d1AaLcX4SevoZYz7DYakyZvS+BQkPiQWBvHEu2c2FU2wH+eZnf1ZUSfBv89MjwjzrGGu 42Y6+pUJOp8ekZ5M3LbX5rVORLXzA0s4sUAPyI+qHdNFfVZ903R6Dm5atzK3EZJEvi0MVz okUoK2d1ovkAnY8jp6ddj1vy+4SVbUs= Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:44:55 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify which legacy packet instructions existed Content-Language: en-GB To: Dave Thaler , bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: bpf@ietf.org, Dave Thaler References: <20240131033759.3634-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yonghong Song In-Reply-To: <20240131033759.3634-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 1/30/24 7:37 PM, Dave Thaler wrote: > As discussed in mailing list discussion at > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bpf/5LnnKm093cGpOmDI9TnLQLBXyys/ > this patch updates the "Legacy BPF Packet access instructions" > section to clarify which instructions are deprecated (vs which > were never defined and so are not deprecated). > > Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler Acked-by: Yonghong Song From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.ietf.org (mail.ietf.org [50.223.129.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 890832134F for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=50.223.129.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706726717; cv=none; b=Y7+fsbwDiGhNe+bvsUITH1HShL0qvSqcB7XE7vozdEFOJlwGdi24LrRKtnW1E+KiW1hi+icwvNoQAHO8CQiPxQzOQVVyV1uRoF/qm7FKdBTqOdZ6EiyPmuxBlQELYLF+zZl4k6uaahgOFNLBax+jfyZbB+FOl+UzW1XROSn6JVA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706726717; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ziLgTL6+ljL0yXBxD1Dh9ma91bNvLCJVi0Doq48XoJM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To: Subject:Content-Type; b=OnB3N7khhCZVAW999oTD8tlPtyU6DIsZxhCdDohofcWtbn/yP/V61unSyRhwdtR2tjYdyuf2/+OCWVy/wc5L0xJHYBj89v0eTA70YDDkEjadQcxLMgvhspxjtr+bQM+dqn3sGgtvtmXSC6B5e4aIdkaBJN89inRnMvKPtsgdrzA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ietf.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org header.i=@ietf.org header.b=WTSfpNK7; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org header.i=@ietf.org header.b=WTSfpNK7; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=O2d1AaLc reason="signature verification failed"; arc=none smtp.client-ip=50.223.129.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ietf.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org header.i=@ietf.org header.b="WTSfpNK7"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org header.i=@ietf.org header.b="WTSfpNK7"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="O2d1AaLc" Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4901C14F749 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:45:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1706726709; bh=ziLgTL6+ljL0yXBxD1Dh9ma91bNvLCJVi0Doq48XoJM=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=WTSfpNK783o3efvfruT9yUpeQtjKVAMKxX2psPYzI8TIbjWrLsaz3BtMTgt7A6A9r btp+hnArHJF6J27u1RhEjrRDyAdA4uPrnFKia5O2oFHFFDwUO4vTIT7DPcL3TRenpn AndkrocWEIYIJPegHDysiO6PDYhfJAHLBl6hHlF4= X-Mailbox-Line: From bpf-bounces@ietf.org Wed Jan 31 10:45:09 2024 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A74C14F694; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:45:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1706726709; bh=ziLgTL6+ljL0yXBxD1Dh9ma91bNvLCJVi0Doq48XoJM=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=WTSfpNK783o3efvfruT9yUpeQtjKVAMKxX2psPYzI8TIbjWrLsaz3BtMTgt7A6A9r btp+hnArHJF6J27u1RhEjrRDyAdA4uPrnFKia5O2oFHFFDwUO4vTIT7DPcL3TRenpn AndkrocWEIYIJPegHDysiO6PDYhfJAHLBl6hHlF4= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B43C14F694 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:45:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.107 X-Spam-Level: Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E6jT5OBc5bza for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:45:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from out-177.mta1.migadu.com (out-177.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3216BC14F68D for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:45:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1706726699; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gSlRMppf4pD7dGbBJ4Xcpz4Z0gJW3xl5EDEUPITxqYk=; b=O2d1AaLcX4SevoZYz7DYakyZvS+BQkPiQWBvHEu2c2FU2wH+eZnf1ZUSfBv89MjwjzrGGu 42Y6+pUJOp8ekZ5M3LbX5rVORLXzA0s4sUAPyI+qHdNFfVZ903R6Dm5atzK3EZJEvi0MVz okUoK2d1ovkAnY8jp6ddj1vy+4SVbUs= Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:44:55 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Dave Thaler , bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: bpf@ietf.org, Dave Thaler References: <20240131033759.3634-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yonghong Song In-Reply-To: <20240131033759.3634-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Bpf] [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify which legacy packet instructions existed X-BeenThere: bpf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: bpf-bounces@ietf.org Sender: "Bpf" Message-ID: <20240131184455.OpVWMaurWOiRX4O35UTpl8Nxojtzzi28kvYfzQzhVpc@z> On 1/30/24 7:37 PM, Dave Thaler wrote: > As discussed in mailing list discussion at > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bpf/5LnnKm093cGpOmDI9TnLQLBXyys/ > this patch updates the "Legacy BPF Packet access instructions" > section to clarify which instructions are deprecated (vs which > were never defined and so are not deprecated). > > Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler Acked-by: Yonghong Song -- Bpf mailing list Bpf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf