BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, willemb@google.com,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 03/15] bpf: introduce timestamp_used to allow UDP socket fetched in bpf prog
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:51:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba353503-bfd3-4de0-bb99-9c7e865e8a73@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL+tcoDS6H4SMDRs9r+cOM_2bdbNRFRQpuYmpVFyxoMcQJDXLQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 1/14/25 6:54 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
> I construct my thoughts here according to our previous discussion:
> 1. not limiting the use of is_fullsock, so in patch 2, I will use the
> follow codes:
> +void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op)
> +{
> +       struct bpf_sock_ops_kern sock_ops;
> +
> +       memset(&sock_ops, 0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, temp));
> +       sock_ops.op = op;
> +       sock_ops.is_fullsock = 1;
> +       sock_ops.sk = sk;

lgtm.

> +       BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SOCK_OPS(sk, &sock_ops, CGROUP_SOCK_OPS);

After looking through the set and looking again at how sk is used in 
__skb_tstamp_tx(), I think the sk must be fullsock here, so using 
__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_ops() as in patch 2 is good. It will be useful to 
have a comment here to explain it must be a fullsock.

> +}
> 
> 2. introduce the allow_direct_access flag which is used to test if the
> socket is allowed to access tcp socket or not.

yeah, right now is only tcp_sock, but future will have UDP TS support.

May be the "allow_direct_access" naming is not obvious to mean the existing 
tcp_sock support. May be "allow_tcp_access"?

I was thinking to set the allow_direct_access for the "existing" sockops 
callback which must be tcp_sock and must have the sk locked.

> On the basis of the above bpf_skops_tx_timestamping() function, I
> would add one check there:
> + if (sk_is_tcp(sk))
> +       sock_ops. allow_direct_access = 1;

so don't set this in the new TS callback from bpf_skops_tx_timestamping 
regardless it is tcp or not.

> 
> Also, I need to set allow_direct_access to one as long as there is
> "sock_ops.is_fullsock = 1;" in the existing callbacks.

Only set allow_direct_access when the sk is fullsock in the "existing" sockops 
callback.

After thinking a bit more today, I think this should work. Please give it a try 
and check if some cases may be missed in sock_ops_convert_ctx_access().

> 
> 3. I will replace is_fullsock with allow_direct_access in
> SOCK_OPS_GET/SET_FIELD() instead of SOCK_OPS_GET_SK().

Yep.

> 
> Then the udp socket can freely access the socket with the helper
> SOCK_OPS_GET_SK() because it is a fullsock. And udp socket cannot
> access struct tcp_sock because in the timestamping callback, there is
> no place where setting allow_direct_access for udp use.

__sk_buff->sk? yes.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-16  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-12 11:37 [PATCH net-next v5 00/15] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 01/15] net-timestamp: add support for bpf_setsockopt() Jason Xing
2025-01-12 14:49   ` kernel test robot
2025-01-13  0:11     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-13  7:32       ` Jason Xing
2025-01-14 23:20   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-14 23:29     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 02/15] net-timestamp: prepare for bpf prog use Jason Xing
2025-01-14 23:39   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15  0:09     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-15  0:15       ` Jason Xing
2025-01-15  0:26         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15  0:37           ` Jason Xing
2025-01-15  0:43             ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 03/15] bpf: introduce timestamp_used to allow UDP socket fetched in bpf prog Jason Xing
2025-01-15  1:17   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15  2:28     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-15  2:54       ` Jason Xing
2025-01-16  0:51         ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-01-16  1:12           ` Jason Xing
2025-01-18  1:42             ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-18  1:58               ` Jason Xing
2025-01-18  2:16                 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-18  2:37                   ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 04/15] net-timestamp: support SK_BPF_CB_FLAGS only in bpf_sock_ops_setsockopt Jason Xing
2025-01-15 21:22   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 23:26     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 05/15] net-timestamp: add strict check in some BPF calls Jason Xing
2025-01-12 14:37   ` kernel test robot
2025-01-13  0:28     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-15 21:48   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 23:32     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-18  2:15       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-18  6:28         ` Jason Xing
2025-01-17 10:18   ` kernel test robot
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 06/15] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING Jason Xing
2025-01-15 22:11   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 23:50     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 07/15] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_SCHED for bpf extension Jason Xing
2025-01-15 22:32   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 23:57     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 08/15] net-timestamp: support sw SCM_TSTAMP_SND " Jason Xing
2025-01-15 22:48   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 23:56     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-18  0:46       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-18  1:43         ` Jason Xing
2025-01-19 13:38           ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 09/15] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_ACK " Jason Xing
2025-01-15 23:02   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 10/15] net-timestamp: support hw SCM_TSTAMP_SND " Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 11/15] net-timestamp: support export skb to the userspace Jason Xing
2025-01-15 23:05   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 23:59     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 12/15] net-timestamp: make TCP tx timestamp bpf extension work Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 13/15] net-timestamp: support tcp_sendmsg for bpf extension Jason Xing
2025-01-16  0:03   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-16  0:41     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-16  1:18       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-16  1:22         ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 14/15] net-timestamp: introduce cgroup lock to avoid affecting non-bpf cases Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 15/15] bpf: add simple bpf tests in the tx path for so_timestamping feature Jason Xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ba353503-bfd3-4de0-bb99-9c7e865e8a73@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox