From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, willemb@google.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 03/15] bpf: introduce timestamp_used to allow UDP socket fetched in bpf prog
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:51:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba353503-bfd3-4de0-bb99-9c7e865e8a73@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL+tcoDS6H4SMDRs9r+cOM_2bdbNRFRQpuYmpVFyxoMcQJDXLQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/14/25 6:54 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
> I construct my thoughts here according to our previous discussion:
> 1. not limiting the use of is_fullsock, so in patch 2, I will use the
> follow codes:
> +void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op)
> +{
> + struct bpf_sock_ops_kern sock_ops;
> +
> + memset(&sock_ops, 0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, temp));
> + sock_ops.op = op;
> + sock_ops.is_fullsock = 1;
> + sock_ops.sk = sk;
lgtm.
> + BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SOCK_OPS(sk, &sock_ops, CGROUP_SOCK_OPS);
After looking through the set and looking again at how sk is used in
__skb_tstamp_tx(), I think the sk must be fullsock here, so using
__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_ops() as in patch 2 is good. It will be useful to
have a comment here to explain it must be a fullsock.
> +}
>
> 2. introduce the allow_direct_access flag which is used to test if the
> socket is allowed to access tcp socket or not.
yeah, right now is only tcp_sock, but future will have UDP TS support.
May be the "allow_direct_access" naming is not obvious to mean the existing
tcp_sock support. May be "allow_tcp_access"?
I was thinking to set the allow_direct_access for the "existing" sockops
callback which must be tcp_sock and must have the sk locked.
> On the basis of the above bpf_skops_tx_timestamping() function, I
> would add one check there:
> + if (sk_is_tcp(sk))
> + sock_ops. allow_direct_access = 1;
so don't set this in the new TS callback from bpf_skops_tx_timestamping
regardless it is tcp or not.
>
> Also, I need to set allow_direct_access to one as long as there is
> "sock_ops.is_fullsock = 1;" in the existing callbacks.
Only set allow_direct_access when the sk is fullsock in the "existing" sockops
callback.
After thinking a bit more today, I think this should work. Please give it a try
and check if some cases may be missed in sock_ops_convert_ctx_access().
>
> 3. I will replace is_fullsock with allow_direct_access in
> SOCK_OPS_GET/SET_FIELD() instead of SOCK_OPS_GET_SK().
Yep.
>
> Then the udp socket can freely access the socket with the helper
> SOCK_OPS_GET_SK() because it is a fullsock. And udp socket cannot
> access struct tcp_sock because in the timestamping callback, there is
> no place where setting allow_direct_access for udp use.
__sk_buff->sk? yes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-12 11:37 [PATCH net-next v5 00/15] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 01/15] net-timestamp: add support for bpf_setsockopt() Jason Xing
2025-01-12 14:49 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-13 0:11 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-13 7:32 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-14 23:20 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-14 23:29 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 02/15] net-timestamp: prepare for bpf prog use Jason Xing
2025-01-14 23:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 0:09 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-15 0:15 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-15 0:26 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 0:37 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-15 0:43 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 03/15] bpf: introduce timestamp_used to allow UDP socket fetched in bpf prog Jason Xing
2025-01-15 1:17 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 2:28 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-15 2:54 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-16 0:51 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-01-16 1:12 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-18 1:42 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-18 1:58 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-18 2:16 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-18 2:37 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 04/15] net-timestamp: support SK_BPF_CB_FLAGS only in bpf_sock_ops_setsockopt Jason Xing
2025-01-15 21:22 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 23:26 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 05/15] net-timestamp: add strict check in some BPF calls Jason Xing
2025-01-12 14:37 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-13 0:28 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-15 21:48 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 23:32 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-18 2:15 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-18 6:28 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-17 10:18 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 06/15] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING Jason Xing
2025-01-15 22:11 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 23:50 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 07/15] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_SCHED for bpf extension Jason Xing
2025-01-15 22:32 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 23:57 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 08/15] net-timestamp: support sw SCM_TSTAMP_SND " Jason Xing
2025-01-15 22:48 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 23:56 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-18 0:46 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-18 1:43 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-19 13:38 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 09/15] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_ACK " Jason Xing
2025-01-15 23:02 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 10/15] net-timestamp: support hw SCM_TSTAMP_SND " Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 11/15] net-timestamp: support export skb to the userspace Jason Xing
2025-01-15 23:05 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-15 23:59 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 12/15] net-timestamp: make TCP tx timestamp bpf extension work Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 13/15] net-timestamp: support tcp_sendmsg for bpf extension Jason Xing
2025-01-16 0:03 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-16 0:41 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-16 1:18 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-16 1:22 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 14/15] net-timestamp: introduce cgroup lock to avoid affecting non-bpf cases Jason Xing
2025-01-12 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next v5 15/15] bpf: add simple bpf tests in the tx path for so_timestamping feature Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba353503-bfd3-4de0-bb99-9c7e865e8a73@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox