From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@fb.com,
yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] veristat: memory accounting for bpf programs
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:31:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb0a4b1d12c8d3e7a5aba2cfce1f07143a7e2b71.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzbTxyGXi=ZNU_yebe2a=zgNoeafRTK9pixJMihUwwo0Pg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2025-06-12 at 17:01 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
[...]
> > +static void destroy_stat_cgroup(void)
> > +{
> > + char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + close(env.memory_peak_fd);
> > +
> > + if (env.orig_cgroup[0]) {
> > + snprintf_trunc(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s/cgroup.procs", env.orig_cgroup);
> > + err = write_one_line(buf, "%d\n", getpid());
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + log_errno("moving self to original cgroup %s\n", env.orig_cgroup);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (env.stat_cgroup[0]) {
> > + err = rmdir(env.stat_cgroup);
>
> We need to enter the original cgroup to successfully remove the one we
> created, is that right? Otherwise, why bother reentering if we are on
> our way out, no?
Yes, cgroup can't be removed if there are member processes.
I chose to organize this way because there would be a message printed
with a name of stale group.
>
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + log_errno("deletion of cgroup %s", env.stat_cgroup);
> > + }
> > +
> > + env.memory_peak_fd = -1;
> > + env.orig_cgroup[0] = 0;
> > + env.stat_cgroup[0] = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Creates a cgroup at /sys/fs/cgroup/veristat-accounting-<pid>,
> > + * moves current process to this cgroup.
> > + */
> > +static void create_stat_cgroup(void)
> > +{
> > + char cgroup_fs_mount[PATH_MAX + 1];
> > + char buf[PATH_MAX + 1];
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + env.memory_peak_fd = -1;
> > +
> > + if (!output_stat_enabled(MEMORY_PEAK))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + err = scanf_one_line("/proc/self/mounts", 2, "%*s %" STR(PATH_MAX) "s cgroup2 %s",
>
> let's just hard-code 1024 or something and not do that STR() magic,
> please (same below).
>
> > + cgroup_fs_mount, buf);
> > + if (err != 2) {
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + log_errno("reading /proc/self/mounts");
> > + else if (!env.quiet)
> > + fprintf(stderr, "Can't find cgroupfs v2 mount point.\n");
> > + goto err_out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* cgroup-v2.rst promises the line "0::<group>" for cgroups v2 */
> > + err = scanf_one_line("/proc/self/cgroup", 1, "0::%" STR(PATH_MAX) "s", buf);
>
> do you think just hard-coding /sys/fs/cgroup would not work in
> practice? It just feels like we are trying to be a bit too flexible
> here...
Idk, removing this saves 10 lines.
On machines I have access to (one CentOS, one Fedora) the mount point
is /sys/fs/cgroup.
>
> > + if (err != 1) {
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + log_errno("reading /proc/self/cgroup");
> > + else if (!env.quiet)
> > + fprintf(stderr, "Can't infer veristat process cgroup.");
> > + goto err_out;
> > + }
> > +
>
> [...]
Ack for other points, thank you for taking a look.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-13 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-12 13:08 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] veristat: memory accounting for bpf programs Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-12 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: include verifier memory allocations in memcg statistics Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-13 0:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-06-13 0:15 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-13 0:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-06-13 0:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-13 1:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-13 2:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-16 8:02 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-12 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] veristat: memory accounting for bpf programs Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-13 0:01 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-06-13 0:31 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-06-13 7:09 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb0a4b1d12c8d3e7a5aba2cfce1f07143a7e2b71.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).