bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, 	martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@fb.com,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] veristat: memory accounting for bpf programs
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:31:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb0a4b1d12c8d3e7a5aba2cfce1f07143a7e2b71.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzbTxyGXi=ZNU_yebe2a=zgNoeafRTK9pixJMihUwwo0Pg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2025-06-12 at 17:01 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

[...]

> > +static void destroy_stat_cgroup(void)
> > +{
> > +       char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > +       int err;
> > +
> > +       close(env.memory_peak_fd);
> > +
> > +       if (env.orig_cgroup[0]) {
> > +               snprintf_trunc(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s/cgroup.procs", env.orig_cgroup);
> > +               err = write_one_line(buf, "%d\n", getpid());
> > +               if (err < 0)
> > +                       log_errno("moving self to original cgroup %s\n", env.orig_cgroup);
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       if (env.stat_cgroup[0]) {
> > +               err = rmdir(env.stat_cgroup);
> 
> We need to enter the original cgroup to successfully remove the one we
> created, is that right? Otherwise, why bother reentering if we are on
> our way out, no?

Yes, cgroup can't be removed if there are member processes.
I chose to organize this way because there would be a message printed
with a name of stale group.

> 
> > +               if (err < 0)
> > +                       log_errno("deletion of cgroup %s", env.stat_cgroup);
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       env.memory_peak_fd = -1;
> > +       env.orig_cgroup[0] = 0;
> > +       env.stat_cgroup[0] = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Creates a cgroup at /sys/fs/cgroup/veristat-accounting-<pid>,
> > + * moves current process to this cgroup.
> > + */
> > +static void create_stat_cgroup(void)
> > +{
> > +       char cgroup_fs_mount[PATH_MAX + 1];
> > +       char buf[PATH_MAX + 1];
> > +       int err;
> > +
> > +       env.memory_peak_fd = -1;
> > +
> > +       if (!output_stat_enabled(MEMORY_PEAK))
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       err = scanf_one_line("/proc/self/mounts", 2, "%*s %" STR(PATH_MAX) "s cgroup2 %s",
> 
> let's just hard-code 1024 or something and not do that STR() magic,
> please (same below).
> 
> > +                            cgroup_fs_mount, buf);
> > +       if (err != 2) {
> > +               if (err < 0)
> > +                       log_errno("reading /proc/self/mounts");
> > +               else if (!env.quiet)
> > +                       fprintf(stderr, "Can't find cgroupfs v2 mount point.\n");
> > +               goto err_out;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       /* cgroup-v2.rst promises the line "0::<group>" for cgroups v2 */
> > +       err = scanf_one_line("/proc/self/cgroup", 1, "0::%" STR(PATH_MAX) "s", buf);
> 
> do you think just hard-coding /sys/fs/cgroup would not work in
> practice? It just feels like we are trying to be a bit too flexible
> here...

Idk, removing this saves 10 lines.
On machines I have access to (one CentOS, one Fedora) the mount point
is /sys/fs/cgroup.

> 
> > +       if (err != 1) {
> > +               if (err < 0)
> > +                       log_errno("reading /proc/self/cgroup");
> > +               else if (!env.quiet)
> > +                       fprintf(stderr, "Can't infer veristat process cgroup.");
> > +               goto err_out;
> > +       }
> > +
> 
> [...]

Ack for other points, thank you for taking a look.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-13  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-12 13:08 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] veristat: memory accounting for bpf programs Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-12 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: include verifier memory allocations in memcg statistics Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-13  0:05   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-06-13  0:15     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-13  0:18       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-06-13  0:53         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-13  1:29           ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-13  2:25             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-16  8:02               ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-12 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] veristat: memory accounting for bpf programs Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-13  0:01   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-06-13  0:31     ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-06-13  7:09     ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bb0a4b1d12c8d3e7a5aba2cfce1f07143a7e2b71.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).