From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] Allow data_meta size > 32
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 13:25:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c37449f1-4b23-41a7-a31d-e58cd35a6142@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb87653c-8ff8-447d-a7a1-25961f60518a@kernel.org>
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:30:41 +0100
>
>
> On 11/28/23 11:33, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 11:26:59AM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/27/23 19:32, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
>>>> Currently, there is no reason for data_meta to be limited to 32 bytes.
>>>> Loosen this limitation and make maximum meta size 252.
>>>
>>> First I though you made a type here with 252 bytes, but then I
>>> remembered
>>> the 4 byte alignment.
>>> I think commit message should elaborate on why 252 bytes.
>>>
>>
>> You are right, will do.
>>
>
> I'm looking at the code to see if metadata can be extended into area
> used by xdp_frame, such that a BPF-prog get direct memory access to this
> (which should not be allowed). The bpf_xdp_adjust_meta() helper does
> handle this (as you/Olek also mentioned in commit msg). A driver could
> set data_meta such that they overlap, but I guess we will categorize
> this as a driver bug.
>
> The XDP headroom have evolved to become dynamic (commonly 192 or 256
> bytes). Thus, we cannot statically reduce metalen with sizeof(struct
> xdp_frame). The maximum meta size 252, could be achieved (and valid) if
> a driver chooses to have more XDP headroom e.g. 288 bytes. So, I guess
> it is correct to say maximum valid meta size is 252 bytes, but can be
> limited and reduced further by drivers chosen XDP headroom and memory
> reserved by struct xdp_frame (limited in bpf_xdp_adjust_meta).
Drivers which don't provide 256 bytes of headroom for XDP are
pathological :p
Either way, as Larysa and you mentioned, the actual available headroom
is checked with adjust_meta(), so here we just make sure its size fits
into u8 meta_len of &skb_shared_info.
>
>
>
>>>>
>>>> Also, modify the selftest, so test_xdp_context_error does not complain
>>>> about the unexpected success.
>>>>
>>>> v2->v3:
>>>> * Fix main patch author
>>>> * Add selftests path
>>>>
>>>> v1->v2:
>>>> * replace 'typeof(metalen)' with the actual type
>>>>
>>>> Aleksander Lobakin (1):
>>>> net, xdp: allow metadata > 32
>>>>
>>>> Larysa Zaremba (1):
>>>> selftests/bpf: increase invalid metadata size
>>>>
>>>> include/linux/skbuff.h | 13
>>>> ++++++++-----
>>>> include/net/xdp.h | 7 ++++++-
>>>> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_context_test_run.c | 4 ++--
>>>> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>
Thanks,
Olek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-28 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-27 18:32 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] Allow data_meta size > 32 Larysa Zaremba
2023-11-27 18:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] selftests/bpf: increase invalid metadata size Larysa Zaremba
2023-11-27 18:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] net, xdp: allow metadata > 32 Larysa Zaremba
2023-11-28 10:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] Allow data_meta size " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-11-28 10:33 ` Larysa Zaremba
2023-11-28 11:30 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-11-28 12:25 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c37449f1-4b23-41a7-a31d-e58cd35a6142@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox