From: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
To: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@baidu.com>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Piotr <piotr.raczynski@intel.com>,
Maciej <maciej.machnikowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: 答复: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/2] intel/xdp fixes for fliping rx buffer
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:31:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c691e3d2-8b16-744c-8918-5be042bd37dc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3695fc71ca140d08a795bbd32d8522f@baidu.com>
On 2020-08-19 10:17, Li,Rongqing wrote:
>
>
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: Björn Töpel [mailto:bjorn.topel@intel.com]
>> 发送时间: 2020年8月19日 14:45
>> 收件人: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>; Björn Töpel
>> <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
>> 抄送: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; intel-wired-lan
>> <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>; Karlsson, Magnus
>> <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>; bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>; Maciej Fijalkowski
>> <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>; Piotr <piotr.raczynski@intel.com>; Maciej
>> <maciej.machnikowski@intel.com>
>> 主题: Re: 答复: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/2] intel/xdp fixes for fliping rx buffer
>>
>> On 2020-08-19 03:37, Li,Rongqing wrote:
>> [...]
>> > Hi:
>> >
>> > Thanks for your explanation.
>> >
>> > But we can reproduce this bug
>> >
>> > We use ebpf to redirect only-Vxlan packets to non-zerocopy AF_XDP, First we
>> see panic on tcp stack, in tcp_collapse: BUG_ON(offset < 0); it is very hard to
>> reproduce.
>> >
>> > Then we use the scp to do test, and has lots of vxlan packet at the same
>> time, scp will be broken frequently.
>> >
>>
>> Ok! Just so that I'm certain of your setup. You receive packets to an i40e netdev
>> where there's an XDP program. The program does XDP_PASS or XDP_REDIRECT
>> to e.g. devmap for non-vxlan packets. However, vxlan packets are redirected to
>> AF_XDP socket(s) in *copy-mode*. Am I understanding that correct?
>>
> Similar as your description,
>
> but the xdp program only redirects vxlan packets to af_xdp socket, other packets will go to Linux kernel networking stack, like scp/ssh packets
>
>
>> I'm assuming this is an x86-64 with 4k page size, right? :-) The page flipping is a
>> bit different if the PAGE_SIZE is not 4k.
>>
>
> We use 4k page size, page flipping is 4k, we did not change the i40e drivers, 4.19 stable kernel
>
Would you mind testing on a newer kernel? Say the latest stable 5.8.2?
>> > With this fixes, scp has not been broken again, and kernel is not panic
>> again >
>>
>> Let's dig into your scenario.
>>
>> Are you saying the following:
>>
>> Page A:
>> +------------
>> | "first skb" ----> Rx HW ring entry X
>> +------------
>> | "second skb"----> Rx HW ring entry X+1 (or X+n)
>> +------------
>>
>
> Like:
>
> First skb will be into tcp socket rx queue
>
> Seconds skb is vxlan packet, will be copy to af_xdp socket, and released.
>
>> This is a scenario that shouldn't be allowed, because there are now two users
>> of the page. If that's the case, the refcounting is broken. Is that the case?
>>
>
> True, it is broken for copy mode xsk
>
Ok. However, the fix is not avoiding the page_frag_free, but finding and
fixing the refcount bug. I'll have a deeper look.
But please, try to reproduce with a newer kernel.
Thanks,
Björn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-19 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1594967062-20674-1-git-send-email-lirongqing@baidu.com>
2020-08-18 14:04 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/2] intel/xdp fixes for fliping rx buffer Björn Töpel
2020-08-19 1:37 ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2020-08-19 6:44 ` Björn Töpel
2020-08-19 8:17 ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2020-08-19 8:31 ` Björn Töpel [this message]
2020-08-19 8:52 ` Björn Töpel
2020-08-20 15:13 ` Björn Töpel
2020-08-20 16:51 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-08-20 18:04 ` Björn Töpel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c691e3d2-8b16-744c-8918-5be042bd37dc@intel.com \
--to=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=maciej.machnikowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piotr.raczynski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox