BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@google.com>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT.
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:55:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c71e0891-a187-4ad9-b554-8f28c15984fd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240605104128.Nn9Cp0CB@linutronix.de>



On 05/06/2024 12.41, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-06-05 12:28:08 [+0200], Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, but how will this affect performance?
> 
> As I wrote in the changelog for v4, I haven't notice a difference. I
> tried to move bpf_net_ctx_set() from cpu_map_bpf_prog_run() to
> cpu_map_kthread_run() to have this assignment only once and I didn't see
> a difference/ I couldn't tell the two kernels apart.
> 

This would be my preferred solution.
See below, your benchmark wasn't testing/measuring this changed code on
remote CPU running kthread.

> This is what I have been using for testing
> 
> | xdp-bench redirect-cpu --cpu 3 --remote-action drop eth1 -e
> 
> in case I was changing the wrong part…

As we saw earlier (with your hardware setup) this test is benchmarking
the RX-NAPI XDP-redirect code.  As the cpumap "remote" CPUs kthread had
idle cycles.

The extra clearing bpf_net_ctx_set() for each packet in the kthread on
the remote CPU will not change the benchmark numbers (as it have idle
cycles).

Looking closer at kernel code + your patch, I see that this clearing
isn't done for each packet, but per bulk (up-to CPUMAP_BATCH 8).  Given
that, I'm more okay with this change.

--Jesper



  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-05 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240529162927.403425-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
2024-05-29 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-05-29 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 12/15] seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-05-29 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 13/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for bpf_scratchpad Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-05-29 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-05-29 21:09   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-05-29 22:09   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-05-31 10:38     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-05 10:28       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-06-05 10:37         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-06-05 10:41         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-05 11:55           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2024-05-29 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 15/15] net: Move per-CPU flush-lists to bpf_net_context " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c71e0891-a187-4ad9-b554-8f28c15984fd@kernel.org \
    --to=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox