From: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: enable all napis before scheduling refill work
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 22:33:17 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c83c386e-96a6-4f9f-8047-23ce866ed320@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEuF0rNYcSSUCdAgsW2Xfen9NGZHNxXpkO2Mt0a4zQJDqQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/10/25 12:45, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 11:23 PM Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 12/9/25 11:30, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:35 PM Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Calling napi_disable() on an already disabled napi can cause the
>>>> deadlock. In commit 4bc12818b363 ("virtio-net: disable delayed refill
>>>> when pausing rx"), to avoid the deadlock, when pausing the RX in
>>>> virtnet_rx_pause[_all](), we disable and cancel the delayed refill work.
>>>> However, in the virtnet_rx_resume_all(), we enable the delayed refill
>>>> work too early before enabling all the receive queue napis.
>>>>
>>>> The deadlock can be reproduced by running
>>>> selftests/drivers/net/hw/xsk_reconfig.py with multiqueue virtio-net
>>>> device and inserting a cond_resched() inside the for loop in
>>>> virtnet_rx_resume_all() to increase the success rate. Because the worker
>>>> processing the delayed refilled work runs on the same CPU as
>>>> virtnet_rx_resume_all(), a reschedule is needed to cause the deadlock.
>>>> In real scenario, the contention on netdev_lock can cause the
>>>> reschedule.
>>>>
>>>> This fixes the deadlock by ensuring all receive queue's napis are
>>>> enabled before we enable the delayed refill work in
>>>> virtnet_rx_resume_all() and virtnet_open().
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 4bc12818b363 ("virtio-net: disable delayed refill when pausing rx")
>>>> Reported-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
>>>> Closes: https://netdev-ctrl.bots.linux.dev/logs/vmksft/drv-hw-dbg/results/400961/3-xdp-py/stderr
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>>> index 8e04adb57f52..f2b1ea65767d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>>> @@ -2858,6 +2858,20 @@ static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
>>>> return err != -ENOMEM;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static void virtnet_rx_refill_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>>>> +{
>>>> + bool schedule_refill = false;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>>> This seems to be still racy?
>>>
>>> For example, in virtnet_open() we had:
>>>
>>> static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>>> int i, err;
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>>> err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i);
>>> if (err < 0)
>>> goto err_enable_qp;
>>> }
>>>
>>> virtnet_rx_refill_all(vi);
>>>
>>> So NAPI and refill work is enabled in this case, so the refill work
>>> could be scheduled and run at the same time?
>> Yes, that's what we expect. We must ensure that refill work is scheduled
>> only when all NAPIs are enabled. The deadlock happens when refill work
>> is scheduled but there are still disabled RX NAPIs.
> Just to make sure we are on the same page, I meant, after refill work
> is enabled, rq0 is NAPI is enabled, in this case the refill work could
> be triggered by the rq0's NAPI so we may end up in the refill work
> that it tries to disable rq1's NAPI while holding the netdev lock.
I don't quite get your point. The current deadlock scenario is this
virtnet_rx_resume_all
napi_enable(rq0) (the rq1 napi is still disabled)
enable_refill_work
refill_work
napi_disable(rq0) -> still okay
napi_enable(rq0) -> still okay
napi_disable(rq1)
-> hold netdev_lock
-> stuck inside the while loop in napi_disable_locked
while (val & (NAPIF_STATE_SCHED | NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC)) {
usleep_range(20, 200);
val = READ_ONCE(n->state);
}
napi_enable(rq1)
-> stuck while trying to acquire the netdev_lock
The problem is that we must not call napi_disable() on an already
disabled NAPI (rq1's NAPI in the example).
In the new virtnet_open
static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
int i, err;
// Note that at this point, refill work is still disabled, vi->refill_enabled == false,
// so even if virtnet_receive is called, the refill_work will not be scheduled.
for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i);
if (err < 0)
goto err_enable_qp;
}
// Here all RX NAPIs are enabled so it's safe to enable refill work again
virtnet_rx_refill_all(vi);
Thanks,
Quang Minh.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-10 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-08 15:34 [PATCH net] virtio-net: enable all napis before scheduling refill work Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-08 15:48 ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-09 4:30 ` Jason Wang
2025-12-09 15:23 ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-10 5:45 ` Jason Wang
2025-12-10 15:33 ` Bui Quang Minh [this message]
2025-12-11 7:27 ` Jason Wang
2025-12-11 15:04 ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-12 6:48 ` Jason Wang
2025-12-12 14:55 ` Bui Quang Minh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c83c386e-96a6-4f9f-8047-23ce866ed320@gmail.com \
--to=minhquangbui99@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).