Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: adjust XDP SOCKETS after file movement

[Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>]

On 7/1/22 3:52 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:13:36PM +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 2:38 PM Maciej Fijalkowski
>> <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 06:28:10AM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
>>>> Commit f36600634282 ("libbpf: move xsk.{c,h} into selftests/bpf") moves
>>>> files tools/{lib => testing/selftests}/bpf/xsk.[ch], but misses to adjust
>>>> the XDP SOCKETS (AF_XDP) section in MAINTAINERS.
>>>>
>>>> Adjust the file entry after this file movement.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Andrii, please ack.
>>>>
>>>> Alexei, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up on top of the commit above.
>>>>
>>>>   MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>>> index fa4bfa3d10bf..27d9e65b9a85 100644
>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>>> @@ -22042,7 +22042,7 @@ F:    include/uapi/linux/xdp_diag.h
>>>>   F:   include/net/netns/xdp.h
>>>>   F:   net/xdp/
>>>>   F:   samples/bpf/xdpsock*
>>>> -F:   tools/lib/bpf/xsk*
>>>> +F:   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xsk*
>>>
>>> Magnus, this doesn't cover xdpxceiver.
>>> How about we move the lib part and xdpxceiver part to a dedicated
>>> directory? Or would it be too nested from main dir POV?
>>
>> Or we can just call everything we add xsk* something?
> 
> No strong feelings. test_xsk.sh probably also needs to be addressed.
> That's why I proposed dedicated dir.

Could one of you follow-up on this for bpf-next tree? Maybe for selftests something
similar as in case of the XDP entry could work.

Thanks,
Daniel