From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@google.com>,
"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@corigine.com>,
"Simon Horman" <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] bpftool: Add LLVM as default library for disassembling JIT-ed programs
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 11:02:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca1d357f-7901-8b01-65c2-a832f49deb81@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca16b420-a4ae-9f9c-1f60-2e2b8df6b4a0@isovalent.com>
On 9/7/22 9:33 AM, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> On 07/09/2022 17:10, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 7:20 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/09/2022 00:46, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 6:36 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Naturally, the display of disassembled instructions comes with a few
>>>>> minor differences. Here is a sample output with libbfd (already
>>>>> supported before this patch):
>>>>>
>>>>> # bpftool prog dump jited id 56
>>>>> bpf_prog_6deef7357e7b4530:
>>>>> 0: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
>>>>> 5: xchg %ax,%ax
>>>>> 7: push %rbp
>>>>> 8: mov %rsp,%rbp
>>>>> b: push %rbx
>>>>> c: push %r13
>>>>> e: push %r14
>>>>> 10: mov %rdi,%rbx
>>>>> 13: movzwq 0xb0(%rbx),%r13
>>>>> 1b: xor %r14d,%r14d
>>>>> 1e: or $0x2,%r14d
>>>>> 22: mov $0x1,%eax
>>>>> 27: cmp $0x2,%r14
>>>>> 2b: jne 0x000000000000002f
>>>>> 2d: xor %eax,%eax
>>>>> 2f: pop %r14
>>>>> 31: pop %r13
>>>>> 33: pop %rbx
>>>>> 34: leave
>>>>> 35: ret
>>>>> 36: int3
>>>>>
>>>>> LLVM supports several variants that we could set when initialising the
>>>>> disassembler, for example with:
>>>>>
>>>>> LLVMSetDisasmOptions(*ctx,
>>>>> LLVMDisassembler_Option_AsmPrinterVariant);
>>>>>
>>>>> but the default printer is kept for now. Here is the output with LLVM:
>>>>>
>>>>> # bpftool prog dump jited id 56
>>>>> bpf_prog_6deef7357e7b4530:
>>>>> 0: nopl (%rax,%rax)
>>>>> 5: nop
>>>>> 7: pushq %rbp
>>>>> 8: movq %rsp, %rbp
>>>>> b: pushq %rbx
>>>>> c: pushq %r13
>>>>> e: pushq %r14
>>>>> 10: movq %rdi, %rbx
>>>>> 13: movzwq 176(%rbx), %r13
>>>>> 1b: xorl %r14d, %r14d
>>>>> 1e: orl $2, %r14d
>>>>> 22: movl $1, %eax
>>>>> 27: cmpq $2, %r14
>>>>> 2b: jne 2
>>>>> 2d: xorl %eax, %eax
>>>>> 2f: popq %r14
>>>>
>>>> If I'm reading the asm correctly the difference is significant.
>>>> jne 0x2f was an absolute address and jmps were easy
>>>> to follow.
>>>> While in llvm disasm it's 'jne 2' ?! What is 2 ?
>>>> 2 bytes from the next insn of 0x2d ?
>>>
>>> Yes, that's it. Apparently, this is how the operand is encoded, and
>>> libbfd does the translation to the absolute address:
>>>
>>> # bpftool prog dump jited id 7868 opcodes
>>> [...]
>>> 2b: jne 0x000000000000002f
>>> 75 02
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> The same difference is observable between objdump and llvm-objdump on an
>>> x86-64 binary for example, although they usually have labels to refer to
>>> ("jne -22 <_obstack_memory_used+0x7d0>"), making the navigation
>>> easier. The only mention I could find of that difference is a report
>>> from 2013 [0].
>>>
>>> [0] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/llvm-objdump-disassembling-jmp/29584/2
>>>
>>>> That is super hard to read.
>>>> Is there a way to tune/configure llvm disasm?
>>>
>>> There's a function and some options to tune it, but I tried them and
>>> none applies to converting the jump operands.
>>>
>>> int LLVMSetDisasmOptions(LLVMDisasmContextRef DC, uint64_t Options);
>>>
>>> /* The option to produce marked up assembly. */
>>> #define LLVMDisassembler_Option_UseMarkup 1
>>> /* The option to print immediates as hex. */
>>> #define LLVMDisassembler_Option_PrintImmHex 2
>>> /* The option use the other assembler printer variant */
>>> #define LLVMDisassembler_Option_AsmPrinterVariant 4
>>> /* The option to set comment on instructions */
>>> #define LLVMDisassembler_Option_SetInstrComments 8
>>> /* The option to print latency information alongside instructions */
>>> #define LLVMDisassembler_Option_PrintLatency 16
>>>
>>> I found that LLVMDisassembler_Option_AsmPrinterVariant read better,
>>> although in my patch I kept the default output which looked closer to
>>> the existing from libbfd. Here's what the option produces:
>>>
>>> bpf_prog_6deef7357e7b4530:
>>> 0: nop dword ptr [rax + rax]
>>> 5: nop
>>> 7: push rbp
>>> 8: mov rbp, rsp
>>> b: push rbx
>>> c: push r13
>>> e: push r14
>>> 10: mov rbx, rdi
>>> 13: movzx r13, word ptr [rbx + 180]
>>> 1b: xor r14d, r14d
>>> 1e: or r14d, 2
>>> 22: mov eax, 1
>>> 27: cmp r14, 2
>>> 2b: jne 2
>>> 2d: xor eax, eax
>>> 2f: pop r14
>>> 31: pop r13
>>> 33: pop rbx
>>> 34: leave
>>> 35: re
>>>
>>> But the jne operand remains a '2'. I'm not aware of any option to change
>>> it in LLVM's disassembler :(.
>>
>> Hmm. llvm-objdump -d test_maps
>> looks fine:
>> 41bfcb: e8 6f f7 ff ff callq 0x41b73f
>> <find_extern_btf_id>
>>
>> the must be something llvm disasm is missing when you feed raw bytes
>> into it.
>> Please keep investigating. In this form I'm afraid it's no go.
>
> OK, I'll keep looking
Quentin, if eventually there is no existing solution for this problem,
we could improve llvm API to encode branch target in more
easy-to-understand form.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-07 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-06 13:36 [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpftool: Add LLVM as default library for disassembling JIT-ed programs Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] bpftool: Define _GNU_SOURCE only once Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 23:14 ` Song Liu
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] bpftool: Remove asserts from JIT disassembler Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 23:16 ` Song Liu
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpftool: Split FEATURE_TESTS/FEATURE_DISPLAY definitions in Makefile Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 23:18 ` Song Liu
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] bpftool: Group libbfd defs in Makefile, only pass them if we use libbfd Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 23:31 ` Song Liu
2022-09-07 14:19 ` Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/7] bpftool: Refactor disassembler for JIT-ed programs Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 23:55 ` Song Liu
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] bpftool: Add LLVM as default library for disassembling " Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 23:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-07 14:20 ` Quentin Monnet
2022-09-07 16:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-07 16:33 ` Quentin Monnet
2022-09-07 18:02 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-09-11 20:13 ` Quentin Monnet
2022-09-07 0:06 ` Song Liu
2022-09-07 14:20 ` Quentin Monnet
2022-09-07 16:37 ` Song Liu
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/7] bpftool: Add llvm feature to "bpftool version" Quentin Monnet
2022-09-10 19:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpftool: Add LLVM as default library for disassembling JIT-ed programs Niklas Söderlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ca1d357f-7901-8b01-65c2-a832f49deb81@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.soderlund@corigine.com \
--cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox