public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
	"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@google.com>,
	"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@corigine.com>,
	"Simon Horman" <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] bpftool: Add LLVM as default library for disassembling JIT-ed programs
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 11:02:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca1d357f-7901-8b01-65c2-a832f49deb81@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca16b420-a4ae-9f9c-1f60-2e2b8df6b4a0@isovalent.com>



On 9/7/22 9:33 AM, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> On 07/09/2022 17:10, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 7:20 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/09/2022 00:46, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 6:36 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Naturally, the display of disassembled instructions comes with a few
>>>>> minor differences. Here is a sample output with libbfd (already
>>>>> supported before this patch):
>>>>>
>>>>>      # bpftool prog dump jited id 56
>>>>>      bpf_prog_6deef7357e7b4530:
>>>>>         0:   nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
>>>>>         5:   xchg   %ax,%ax
>>>>>         7:   push   %rbp
>>>>>         8:   mov    %rsp,%rbp
>>>>>         b:   push   %rbx
>>>>>         c:   push   %r13
>>>>>         e:   push   %r14
>>>>>        10:   mov    %rdi,%rbx
>>>>>        13:   movzwq 0xb0(%rbx),%r13
>>>>>        1b:   xor    %r14d,%r14d
>>>>>        1e:   or     $0x2,%r14d
>>>>>        22:   mov    $0x1,%eax
>>>>>        27:   cmp    $0x2,%r14
>>>>>        2b:   jne    0x000000000000002f
>>>>>        2d:   xor    %eax,%eax
>>>>>        2f:   pop    %r14
>>>>>        31:   pop    %r13
>>>>>        33:   pop    %rbx
>>>>>        34:   leave
>>>>>        35:   ret
>>>>>        36:   int3
>>>>>
>>>>> LLVM supports several variants that we could set when initialising the
>>>>> disassembler, for example with:
>>>>>
>>>>>      LLVMSetDisasmOptions(*ctx,
>>>>>                           LLVMDisassembler_Option_AsmPrinterVariant);
>>>>>
>>>>> but the default printer is kept for now. Here is the output with LLVM:
>>>>>
>>>>>      # bpftool prog dump jited id 56
>>>>>      bpf_prog_6deef7357e7b4530:
>>>>>         0:   nopl    (%rax,%rax)
>>>>>         5:   nop
>>>>>         7:   pushq   %rbp
>>>>>         8:   movq    %rsp, %rbp
>>>>>         b:   pushq   %rbx
>>>>>         c:   pushq   %r13
>>>>>         e:   pushq   %r14
>>>>>        10:   movq    %rdi, %rbx
>>>>>        13:   movzwq  176(%rbx), %r13
>>>>>        1b:   xorl    %r14d, %r14d
>>>>>        1e:   orl     $2, %r14d
>>>>>        22:   movl    $1, %eax
>>>>>        27:   cmpq    $2, %r14
>>>>>        2b:   jne     2
>>>>>        2d:   xorl    %eax, %eax
>>>>>        2f:   popq    %r14
>>>>
>>>> If I'm reading the asm correctly the difference is significant.
>>>> jne 0x2f was an absolute address and jmps were easy
>>>> to follow.
>>>> While in llvm disasm it's 'jne 2' ?! What is 2 ?
>>>> 2 bytes from the next insn of 0x2d ?
>>>
>>> Yes, that's it. Apparently, this is how the operand is encoded, and
>>> libbfd does the translation to the absolute address:
>>>
>>>      # bpftool prog dump jited id 7868 opcodes
>>>      [...]
>>>        2b:   jne    0x000000000000002f
>>>              75 02
>>>      [...]
>>>
>>> The same difference is observable between objdump and llvm-objdump on an
>>> x86-64 binary for example, although they usually have labels to refer to
>>> ("jne     -22 <_obstack_memory_used+0x7d0>"), making the navigation
>>> easier. The only mention I could find of that difference is a report
>>> from 2013 [0].
>>>
>>> [0] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/llvm-objdump-disassembling-jmp/29584/2
>>>
>>>> That is super hard to read.
>>>> Is there a way to tune/configure llvm disasm?
>>>
>>> There's a function and some options to tune it, but I tried them and
>>> none applies to converting the jump operands.
>>>
>>>      int LLVMSetDisasmOptions(LLVMDisasmContextRef DC, uint64_t Options);
>>>
>>>      /* The option to produce marked up assembly. */
>>>      #define LLVMDisassembler_Option_UseMarkup 1
>>>      /* The option to print immediates as hex. */
>>>      #define LLVMDisassembler_Option_PrintImmHex 2
>>>      /* The option use the other assembler printer variant */
>>>      #define LLVMDisassembler_Option_AsmPrinterVariant 4
>>>      /* The option to set comment on instructions */
>>>      #define LLVMDisassembler_Option_SetInstrComments 8
>>>      /* The option to print latency information alongside instructions */
>>>      #define LLVMDisassembler_Option_PrintLatency 16
>>>
>>> I found that LLVMDisassembler_Option_AsmPrinterVariant read better,
>>> although in my patch I kept the default output which looked closer to
>>> the existing from libbfd. Here's what the option produces:
>>>
>>>      bpf_prog_6deef7357e7b4530:
>>>         0:   nop     dword ptr [rax + rax]
>>>         5:   nop
>>>         7:   push    rbp
>>>         8:   mov     rbp, rsp
>>>         b:   push    rbx
>>>         c:   push    r13
>>>         e:   push    r14
>>>        10:   mov     rbx, rdi
>>>        13:   movzx   r13, word ptr [rbx + 180]
>>>        1b:   xor     r14d, r14d
>>>        1e:   or      r14d, 2
>>>        22:   mov     eax, 1
>>>        27:   cmp     r14, 2
>>>        2b:   jne     2
>>>        2d:   xor     eax, eax
>>>        2f:   pop     r14
>>>        31:   pop     r13
>>>        33:   pop     rbx
>>>        34:   leave
>>>        35:   re
>>>
>>> But the jne operand remains a '2'. I'm not aware of any option to change
>>> it in LLVM's disassembler :(.
>>
>> Hmm. llvm-objdump -d test_maps
>> looks fine:
>>    41bfcb: e8 6f f7 ff ff                   callq    0x41b73f
>> <find_extern_btf_id>
>>
>> the must be something llvm disasm is missing when you feed raw bytes
>> into it.
>> Please keep investigating. In this form I'm afraid it's no go.
> 
> OK, I'll keep looking

Quentin, if eventually there is no existing solution for this problem, 
we could improve llvm API to encode branch target in more 
easy-to-understand form.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-07 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-06 13:36 [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpftool: Add LLVM as default library for disassembling JIT-ed programs Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] bpftool: Define _GNU_SOURCE only once Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 23:14   ` Song Liu
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] bpftool: Remove asserts from JIT disassembler Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 23:16   ` Song Liu
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpftool: Split FEATURE_TESTS/FEATURE_DISPLAY definitions in Makefile Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 23:18   ` Song Liu
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] bpftool: Group libbfd defs in Makefile, only pass them if we use libbfd Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 23:31   ` Song Liu
2022-09-07 14:19     ` Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/7] bpftool: Refactor disassembler for JIT-ed programs Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 23:55   ` Song Liu
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] bpftool: Add LLVM as default library for disassembling " Quentin Monnet
2022-09-06 23:46   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-07 14:20     ` Quentin Monnet
2022-09-07 16:10       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-07 16:33         ` Quentin Monnet
2022-09-07 18:02           ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-09-11 20:13             ` Quentin Monnet
2022-09-07  0:06   ` Song Liu
2022-09-07 14:20     ` Quentin Monnet
2022-09-07 16:37       ` Song Liu
2022-09-06 13:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/7] bpftool: Add llvm feature to "bpftool version" Quentin Monnet
2022-09-10 19:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpftool: Add LLVM as default library for disassembling JIT-ed programs Niklas Söderlund

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ca1d357f-7901-8b01-65c2-a832f49deb81@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund@corigine.com \
    --cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox