BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,  daniel@iogearbox.net,
	martin.lau@kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] PTR_TO_BTF_ID arguments in global subprogs
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:22:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb2d2a2e5f05e9aad0dfef1109fca9022b351e11.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240105000909.2818934-1-andrii@kernel.org>

On Thu, 2024-01-04 at 16:09 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> This patch set follows recent changes that added btf_decl_tag-based argument
> annotation support for global subprogs. This time we add ability to pass
> PTR_TO_BTF_ID (BTF-aware kernel pointers) arguments into global subprograms.
> We support explicitly trusted and untrusted arguments. Legacy semi-trusted
> variant is not supported.
> 
> Patches #2 through #4 do preparatory refactorings to add support for multiple
> tags per argument. This is important for being able to use modifiers like
> __arg_nonnull together with trusted/untrusted arguments.
> 
> Patch #5 is adding the actual __arg_trusted and __arg_untrusted support.
> 
> It also raises a question about default nullable vs non-nullable semantics for
> PTR_TO_BTF_ID arguments. It feels like having both __arg_nonnull and
> __arg_nullable would provide the best kind of experience and flexibility, but
> for now we implement nullable by default semantics, as a more conservative
> behavior.
> 
> Patch #7 adds bpf_core_cast() helper macro which is a wrapper around
> bpf_rdonly_cast() kfunc, but hides BTF ID manipulations behind more
> user-friendly type argument instead. We utilize this macro in selftests added
> in patch #8.
> 
> Patch #8 adds a bunch of positive and negative tests to validate expected
> semantics for various trusted/untrusted + nullable/non-null variants. We also
> make sure that global subprog cannot destroy PTR_TO_BTF_ID, as that would
> wreak havoc in caller program that is not aware of this possibility.
> 
> There were proposals to do kernel-side type enforcement for __arg_ctx, let's
> decide whether we should do that and for which program types, and I can
> accommodate the logic in future revisions.
> 
> Cc: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@meta.com>

Full patch-set looks good to me.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-07 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-05  0:09 [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] PTR_TO_BTF_ID arguments in global subprogs Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05  0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] selftests/bpf: fix test_loader check message Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05  0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/8] bpf: make sure scalar args don't accept __arg_nonnull tag Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05  0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] bpf: prepare btf_prepare_func_args() for multiple tags per argument Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05  0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/8] bpf: support " Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05  0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] bpf: add __arg_trusted and __arg_untrusted global func tags Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-12  2:05   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-12 18:43     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05  0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/8] libbpf: add __arg_trusted and __arg_untrusted annotation macros Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05  0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/8] libbpf: add bpf_core_cast() macro Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05  0:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/8] selftests/bpf: add trusted/untrusted global subprog arg tests Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-07 22:22 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-01-12  2:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] PTR_TO_BTF_ID arguments in global subprogs patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cb2d2a2e5f05e9aad0dfef1109fca9022b351e11.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@meta.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox