From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from layka.disroot.org (layka.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C407C345736 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 05:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.21.23.139 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790919371; cv=none; b=U5WuGkh48HEnLMZG5JhRJncmCr0K/mKyX+AlHJyldn4rn7tz6NPwy+Yy+wjJdM2/5peOZnnWMZbXS6NPg8vMVhkOWIwHfcxxppVucNZhzx8dr1sJBfHWUuUbfeYU4I8lPEJE3wVfYCUhB2yt/T1QwigoLFnKOVDhh/4dw7YB6tk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790919371; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1uC8JRwme8mfW6A/ztGvS6a/Wr9hlCg7l4ImC4V84Ug=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=VDEhBZ3A5SNfU8DsiUx4+fm91rH19qUQ2k6a+Ma68elaohTsWByb/FU19ElT5VEqJjgN5ItEun4UHUtVCBRiIGBURjdKvtsxmLby1EhMfrAJWXf3J/csqUOZ53cMzifStyU7PIKfF2tcvY1/fXY3JgHfLCSAK7R0f1uT35P+qeA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=disroot.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b=HwZZTNO5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.21.23.139 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=disroot.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b="HwZZTNO5" Received: from mail01.layka.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1931C82D2E; Fri, 02 Oct 2026 07:36:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id TSD6NQUV5X3l; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 07:36:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1790919367; bh=1uC8JRwme8mfW6A/ztGvS6a/Wr9hlCg7l4ImC4V84Ug=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=HwZZTNO5DTdxDgC5jSrMJ7yWxjaNhsV3vpU0PEVSUPbN7l4iQY0r6fkc14FC74kRd EZjoOgTWeSTVWBfMvCB179R71j4aHHrbuFl2d1QfoQhq6aRZogjuVLKk07is040EiC PiDSZPWiX5PpqZ/uHc6V86Cg6SpD5Zd9Qwpbf+cywBZ9GRgdy54ADaKJkyUuvIgDRv dUnCd7fqVFqEWA0SJ0zYk4CKlFQVqLJj9po9duRsur0wPQTiqzO0bewMmOtpHB7IeO nZPVlvJghZi0sMqkECnCEWOvldXD7bmCGPnymlJIsNGaR7W4/wxbUVI4e6Dsopavp5 rsqKmqF8EOTIQ== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 06:36:00 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test for percpu map flags combination To: Leon Hwang , bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org, emil@etsalapatis.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev References: <20260930135753.1063495-1-maghasi@disroot.org> <20260930135753.1063495-3-maghasi@disroot.org> <9d233b9f-4eb4-4550-8dfa-f56b2b6492ad@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US From: Masoud Aghasi In-Reply-To: <9d233b9f-4eb4-4550-8dfa-f56b2b6492ad@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/10/2026 16:17, Leon Hwang wrote: > On 2026/9/30 21:57, Masoud Aghasi wrote: >> Add tests to exercise usage of a combination of flags for >> percpu hash map updates. >> >> Before the fix, these tests fail to respect user flags combination of >> (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_EXIST). With the fix applied these tests pass. > > I think combinations of (BPF_F_CPU, BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) and (BPF_EXIST, > BPF_NOEXIST) should be covered for all per-CPU map types where applicable. > > Thanks, > Leon > >> [...] > Thanks. I will add full test coverage for these to v3.