From: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: Improve 64bits bounds refinement
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 16:20:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1752934170.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com> (raw)
This patchset improves the 64bits bounds refinement when the s64 ranges
crosses the sign boundary. The first patch explains the small addition
to __reg64_deduce_bounds. The third patch adds a selftest with a more
complete example of the impact on verification. The second and last
patches update the existing selftests to take the new refinement into
account.
This patchset should reduce the number of kernel warnings hit by
syzkaller due to invariant violations [1]. It was also tested with
Agni [2] (and Cilium's CI for good measure).
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c711ce17dd78e5d4fdcf [1]
Link: https://github.com/bpfverif/agni [2]
Paul Chaignon (4):
bpf: Improve bounds when s64 crosses sign boundary
selftests/bpf: Update reg_bound range refinement logic
selftests/bpf: Test cross-sign 64bits range refinement
selftests/bpf: Test invariants on JSLT crossing sign
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c | 14 ++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c | 25 ++++++++++-
3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-07-19 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-19 14:20 Paul Chaignon [this message]
2025-07-19 14:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf: Improve bounds when s64 crosses sign boundary Paul Chaignon
2025-07-21 21:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-22 7:32 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-07-22 22:09 ` Paul Chaignon
2025-07-23 7:49 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-07-19 14:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: Update reg_bound range refinement logic Paul Chaignon
2025-07-21 21:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-22 21:20 ` Paul Chaignon
2025-07-22 21:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-19 14:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: Test cross-sign 64bits range refinement Paul Chaignon
2025-07-21 21:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-24 14:03 ` Paul Chaignon
2025-07-19 14:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test invariants on JSLT crossing sign Paul Chaignon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1752934170.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--to=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).