* [PATCH v7 0/4] Align atomic storage
@ 2026-01-13 5:22 Finn Thain
2026-01-13 5:22 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] bpf: Explicitly align bpf_res_spin_lock Finn Thain
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Finn Thain @ 2026-01-13 5:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Peter Zijlstra, Will Deacon
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, Ard Biesheuvel, Arnd Bergmann,
Alexei Starovoitov, Boqun Feng, Borislav Petkov, bpf, Rich Felker,
Daniel Borkmann, Dave Hansen, Dinh Nguyen, Eduard Zingerman,
Gary Guo, Geert Uytterhoeven, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, Guo Ren,
Hao Luo, H. Peter Anvin, John Fastabend, Jiri Olsa, Jonas Bonn,
KP Singh, linux-arch, linux-csky, linux-kernel, linux-m68k,
linux-openrisc, linux-sh, Mark Rutland, Martin KaFai Lau,
Ingo Molnar, Sasha Levin, Stanislav Fomichev, Stafford Horne,
Song Liu, Stefan Kristiansson, Thomas Gleixner, Yonghong Song,
Yoshinori Sato
This series adds the __aligned attribute to atomic_t and atomic64_t
definitions in include/linux and include/asm-generic (respectively)
to get natural alignment of both types on csky, m68k, microblaze,
nios2, openrisc and sh.
This series also adds Kconfig options to enable a new run-time warning
to help reveal misaligned atomic accesses on platforms which don't
trap that.
The performance impact is expected to vary across platforms and workloads.
The measurements I made on m68k show that some workloads run faster and
others slower.
---
Changed since v6
- Test for __DISABLE_EXPORTS macro instead of __DISABLE_BUG_TABLE macro.
Changed since v5:
- Added acked-by and revewed-by tags.
- Added a new macro to inhibit emission of __bug_table section, for the
benefit of pre-boot code like the EFI stub loader.
Changed since v4:
- Dropped parisc header file patch as it's been merged already.
- Submitted as PATCH instead of RFC.
Changed since v3:
- Rebased on v6.17.
- New patch to resolve header dependency issue on parisc.
- Dropped documentation patch.
Changed since v2:
- Specify natural alignment for atomic64_t.
- CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC checks for natural alignment again.
- New patch to add weakened alignment check.
- New patch for explicit alignment in BPF header.
---
Finn Thain (3):
bpf: Explicitly align bpf_res_spin_lock
atomic: Specify alignment for atomic_t and atomic64_t
atomic: Add option for weaker alignment check
Peter Zijlstra (1):
atomic: Add alignment check to instrumented atomic operations
include/asm-generic/atomic64.h | 2 +-
include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h | 2 +-
include/linux/instrumented.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
include/linux/types.h | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c | 1 -
lib/Kconfig.debug | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.49.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v7 1/4] bpf: Explicitly align bpf_res_spin_lock
2026-01-13 5:22 [PATCH v7 0/4] Align atomic storage Finn Thain
@ 2026-01-13 5:22 ` Finn Thain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Finn Thain @ 2026-01-13 5:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Peter Zijlstra, Will Deacon
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Boqun Feng, Gary Guo, Mark Rutland, linux-arch,
linux-kernel, linux-m68k, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev,
Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa, Geert Uytterhoeven, bpf
Align bpf_res_spin_lock to avoid a BUILD_BUG_ON() when the alignment
changes, as it will do on m68k when, in a subsequent patch, the minimum
alignment of the atomic_t member of struct rqspinlock gets increased
from 2 to 4. Drop the BUILD_BUG_ON() as it becomes redundant.
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
---
Changed since v5:
- Added tag from Arnd Bergmann.
---
include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h
index 0f2dcbbfee2f..dd36ac96bf66 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct rqspinlock {
*/
struct bpf_res_spin_lock {
u32 val;
-};
+} __aligned(__alignof__(struct rqspinlock));
struct qspinlock;
#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c b/kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c
index f7d0c8d4644e..8d892fb099ac 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c
@@ -694,7 +694,6 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_res_spin_lock(struct bpf_res_spin_lock *lock)
int ret;
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(rqspinlock_t) != sizeof(struct bpf_res_spin_lock));
- BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(rqspinlock_t) != __alignof__(struct bpf_res_spin_lock));
preempt_disable();
ret = res_spin_lock((rqspinlock_t *)lock);
--
2.49.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-13 5:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-13 5:22 [PATCH v7 0/4] Align atomic storage Finn Thain
2026-01-13 5:22 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] bpf: Explicitly align bpf_res_spin_lock Finn Thain
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox