public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
To: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>,
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@chromium.org>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Khadija Kamran <kamrankhadijadj@gmail.com>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>,
	Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/20] lsm: Refactor return value of LSM hook vm_enough_memory
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 08:46:51 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1a7de68-1e36-42e6-bdc8-4046ea52338a@hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711111908.3817636-2-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>

Jul 11, 2024 06:14:08 Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>:

> From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
>
> To be consistent with most LSM hooks, convert the return value of
> hook vm_enough_memory to 0 or a negative error code.
>
> Before:
> - Hook vm_enough_memory returns 1 if permission is granted, 0 if not.
> - LSM_RET_DEFAULT(vm_enough_memory_mm) is 1.
>
> After:
> - Hook vm_enough_memory reutrns 0 if permission is granted, negative
>   error code if not.
> - LSM_RET_DEFAULT(vm_enough_memory_mm) is 0.

I haven't done a detailed review yet, but based on the description this is definitely a good change.  Thank you.

> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
> ---
> include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h |  2 +-
> include/linux/security.h      |  2 +-
> security/commoncap.c          | 11 +++--------
> security/security.c           | 11 +++++------
> security/selinux/hooks.c      | 15 ++++-----------
> 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> index 44488b1ab9a9..e6e6f8473955 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ LSM_HOOK(int, 0, quota_on, struct dentry *dentry)
> LSM_HOOK(int, 0, syslog, int type)
> LSM_HOOK(int, 0, settime, const struct timespec64 *ts,
>      const struct timezone *tz)
> -LSM_HOOK(int, 1, vm_enough_memory, struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
> +LSM_HOOK(int, 0, vm_enough_memory, struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
> LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bprm_creds_for_exec, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bprm_creds_from_file, struct linux_binprm *bprm, const struct file *file)
> LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bprm_check_security, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index de3af33e6ff5..454f96307cb9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static inline int security_settime64(const struct timespec64 *ts,
>
> static inline int security_vm_enough_memory_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
> {
> -   return __vm_enough_memory(mm, pages, cap_vm_enough_memory(mm, pages));
> +   return __vm_enough_memory(mm, pages, !cap_vm_enough_memory(mm, pages));
> }
>
> static inline int security_bprm_creds_for_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
> index 162d96b3a676..cefad323a0b1 100644
> --- a/security/commoncap.c
> +++ b/security/commoncap.c
> @@ -1396,17 +1396,12 @@ int cap_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
>   * Determine whether the allocation of a new virtual mapping by the current
>   * task is permitted.
>   *
> - * Return: 1 if permission is granted, 0 if not.
> + * Return: 0 if permission granted, negative error code if not.
>   */
> int cap_vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
> {
> -   int cap_sys_admin = 0;
> -
> -   if (cap_capable(current_cred(), &init_user_ns,
> -               CAP_SYS_ADMIN, CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT) == 0)
> -       cap_sys_admin = 1;
> -
> -   return cap_sys_admin;
> +   return cap_capable(current_cred(), &init_user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
> +              CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index e5ca08789f74..3475f0cab3da 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -1115,15 +1115,14 @@ int security_vm_enough_memory_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
>     int rc;
>
>     /*
> -    * The module will respond with a positive value if
> -    * it thinks the __vm_enough_memory() call should be
> -    * made with the cap_sys_admin set. If all of the modules
> -    * agree that it should be set it will. If any module
> -    * thinks it should not be set it won't.
> +    * The module will respond with 0 if it thinks the __vm_enough_memory()
> +    * call should be made with the cap_sys_admin set. If all of the modules
> +    * agree that it should be set it will. If any module thinks it should
> +    * not be set it won't.
>      */
>     hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.vm_enough_memory, list) {
>         rc = hp->hook.vm_enough_memory(mm, pages);
> -       if (rc <= 0) {
> +       if (rc < 0) {
>             cap_sys_admin = 0;
>             break;
>         }
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index 7eed331e90f0..9cd5a8f1f6a3 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@ -2202,23 +2202,16 @@ static int selinux_syslog(int type)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Check that a process has enough memory to allocate a new virtual
> - * mapping. 0 means there is enough memory for the allocation to
> - * succeed and -ENOMEM implies there is not.
> + * Check permission for allocating a new virtual mapping. Returns
> + * 0 if permission is granted, negative error code if not.
>   *
>   * Do not audit the selinux permission check, as this is applied to all
>   * processes that allocate mappings.
>   */
> static int selinux_vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
> {
> -   int rc, cap_sys_admin = 0;
> -
> -   rc = cred_has_capability(current_cred(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
> -                CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT, true);
> -   if (rc == 0)
> -       cap_sys_admin = 1;
> -
> -   return cap_sys_admin;
> +   return cred_has_capability(current_cred(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
> +                  CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT, true);
> }
>
> /* binprm security operations */
> --
> 2.30.2


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-11 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-11 11:18 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/20] Add return value range check for BPF LSM Xu Kuohai
2024-07-11 11:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/20] lsm: Refactor return value of LSM hook vm_enough_memory Xu Kuohai
2024-07-11 13:46   ` Serge Hallyn [this message]
2024-07-19  2:07   ` [PATCH v4 1/20] " Paul Moore
2024-07-11 11:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/20] lsm: Refactor return value of LSM hook inode_need_killpriv Xu Kuohai
2024-07-11 14:15   ` Serge Hallyn
2024-07-13  8:06     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-19  2:08   ` [PATCH v4 2/20] " Paul Moore
2024-07-20  9:27     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-11 11:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/20] lsm: Refactor return value of LSM hook inode_getsecurity Xu Kuohai
2024-07-12 13:31   ` Simon Horman
2024-07-13  8:07     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-19  2:08   ` [PATCH v4 3/20] " Paul Moore
2024-07-20  9:28     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-11 11:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/20] lsm: Refactor return value of LSM hook inode_listsecurity Xu Kuohai
2024-07-19  2:08   ` [PATCH v4 4/20] " Paul Moore
2024-07-20  9:29     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-11 11:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/20] lsm: Refactor return value of LSM hook inode_copy_up_xattr Xu Kuohai
2024-07-19  2:08   ` [PATCH v4 5/20] " Paul Moore
2024-07-20  9:29     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-11 11:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/20] lsm: Refactor return value of LSM hook getselfattr Xu Kuohai
2024-07-19  2:08   ` [PATCH v4 6/20] " Paul Moore
2024-07-20  9:30     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-11 11:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/20] lsm: Refactor return value of LSM hook setprocattr Xu Kuohai
2024-07-19  2:08   ` [PATCH v4 7/20] " Paul Moore
2024-07-20  9:31     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-11 11:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/20] lsm: Refactor return value of LSM hook getprocattr Xu Kuohai
2024-07-19  2:08   ` [PATCH v4 8/20] " Paul Moore
2024-07-20  9:30     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-11 11:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/20] lsm: Refactor return value of LSM hook key_getsecurity Xu Kuohai
2024-07-19  2:08   ` [PATCH v4 9/20] " Paul Moore
2024-07-20  9:31     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-22 21:35       ` Paul Moore
2024-07-23  7:04         ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-23 18:34           ` Paul Moore
2024-07-11 11:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/20] lsm: Refactor return value of LSM hook audit_rule_match Xu Kuohai
2024-07-19  2:08   ` [PATCH " Paul Moore
2024-07-20  9:31     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-11 11:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/20] bpf, lsm: Add disabled BPF LSM hook list Xu Kuohai
2024-07-12 17:56   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-13  8:11     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-07-11 11:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/20] bpf, lsm: Enable BPF LSM prog to read/write return value parameters Xu Kuohai
2024-07-12 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/20] Add return value range check for BPF LSM Paul Moore
2024-07-12 16:00   ` Paul Moore
2024-07-12 21:44 ` Paul Moore
2024-07-19  2:13   ` Paul Moore
2024-07-19  3:55     ` Xu Kuohai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d1a7de68-1e36-42e6-bdc8-4046ea52338a@hallyn.com \
    --to=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=jackmanb@chromium.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kamrankhadijadj@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mattbobrowski@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox