BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
	Joe Stringer <joe@cilium.io>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/23] bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to return an allocated mem
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:05:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d244394a-bea9-bced-fc9e-ffbc096631ed@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO-hwJKwX2LW8wuFzQbWm-ttwqocNBc-evgpn2An-D-92osw0Q@mail.gmail.com>



On 7/18/22 7:36 AM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 6:29 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/12/22 7:58 AM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>>> When a kfunc is not returning a pointer to a struct but to a plain type,
>>> we can consider it is a valid allocated memory assuming that:
>>> - one of the arguments is either called rdonly_buf_size or
>>>     rdwr_buf_size
>>> - and this argument is a const from the caller point of view
>>>
>>> We can then use this parameter as the size of the allocated memory.
>>>
>>> The memory is either read-only or read-write based on the name
>>> of the size parameter.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, this permits a kfunc like
>>      int *kfunc(..., int rdonly_buf_size);
>>      ...
>>      int *p = kfunc(..., 20);
>> so the 'p' points to a memory buffer with size 20.
> 
> Yes, exactly.
> 
>>
>> This looks like a strange interface although probably there
>> is a valid reason for this as I didn't participated in
>> earlier discussions.
> 
> Well, the point is I need to be able to access a memory region that
> was allocated dynamically. For drivers, the incoming data can not
> usually be bound to a static value, and so we can not have the data
> statically defined in the matching struct.
> So this allows defining a kfunc to return any memory properly
> allocated and owned by the device.

Okay, thanks for explanation.

> 
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> changes in v6:
>>> - code review from Kartikeya:
>>>     - remove comment change that had no reasons to be
>>>     - remove handling of PTR_TO_MEM with kfunc releases
>>>     - introduce struct bpf_kfunc_arg_meta
>>>     - do rdonly/rdwr_buf_size check in btf_check_kfunc_arg_match
>>>     - reverted most of the changes in verifier.c
>>>     - make sure kfunc acquire is using a struct pointer, not just a plain
>>>       pointer
>>>     - also forward ref_obj_id to PTR_TO_MEM in kfunc to not use after free
>>>       the allocated memory
>>>
>>> changes in v5:
>>> - updated PTR_TO_MEM comment in btf.c to match upstream
>>> - make it read-only or read-write based on the name of size
>>>
>>> new in v4
>>> ---
>>>    include/linux/bpf.h   | 10 ++++++-
>>>    include/linux/btf.h   | 12 ++++++++
>>>    kernel/bpf/btf.c      | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>    kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>    4 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-19 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-12 14:58 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/23] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/23] selftests/bpf: fix config for CLS_BPF Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15 23:55   ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/23] bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to read user provided context Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15 23:56   ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-16 19:47   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-18 13:53     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/23] bpf/verifier: do not clear meta in check_mem_size Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-16  0:03   ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/23] selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-16  0:17   ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/23] bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to return an allocated mem Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-16  4:29   ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-18 14:36     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-19 16:05       ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-07-16 20:32   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-18 15:28     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/23] selftests/bpf: Add tests for kfunc returning a memory pointer Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-16  4:33   ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-18  8:42     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/23] bpf: prepare for more bpf syscall to be used from kernel and user space Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-16  4:37   ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/23] libbpf: add map_get_fd_by_id and map_delete_elem in light skeleton Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-16  4:41   ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/23] HID: core: store the unique system identifier in hid_device Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15  5:00   ` Greg KH
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/23] HID: export hid_report_type to uapi Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15  5:00   ` Greg KH
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/23] HID: convert defines of HID class requests into a proper enum Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15  5:01   ` Greg KH
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 12/23] HID: initial BPF implementation Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-13  8:48   ` Quentin Monnet
2022-07-13 11:36     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15  5:02   ` Greg KH
2022-07-15  9:56     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15 11:43       ` Greg KH
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 13/23] selftests/bpf: add tests for the HID-bpf initial implementation Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 14/23] HID: bpf: allocate data memory for device_event BPF programs Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 15/23] selftests/bpf/hid: add test to change the report size Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 16/23] HID: bpf: introduce hid_hw_request() Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 17/23] selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_hid_hw_request Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 18/23] HID: bpf: allow to change the report descriptor Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 19/23] selftests/bpf: add report descriptor fixup tests Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 20/23] selftests/bpf: Add a test for BPF_F_INSERT_HEAD Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 21/23] samples/bpf: add new hid_mouse example Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-13 12:06   ` Dominique Martinet
2022-07-13 12:32     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 22/23] HID: bpf: add Surface Dial example Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 23/23] Documentation: add HID-BPF docs Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-14 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/23] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-15 17:34   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d244394a-bea9-bced-fc9e-ffbc096631ed@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe@cilium.io \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=tero.kristo@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox