From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
Joe Stringer <joe@cilium.io>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/23] bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to return an allocated mem
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:05:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d244394a-bea9-bced-fc9e-ffbc096631ed@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO-hwJKwX2LW8wuFzQbWm-ttwqocNBc-evgpn2An-D-92osw0Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/18/22 7:36 AM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 6:29 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/12/22 7:58 AM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>>> When a kfunc is not returning a pointer to a struct but to a plain type,
>>> we can consider it is a valid allocated memory assuming that:
>>> - one of the arguments is either called rdonly_buf_size or
>>> rdwr_buf_size
>>> - and this argument is a const from the caller point of view
>>>
>>> We can then use this parameter as the size of the allocated memory.
>>>
>>> The memory is either read-only or read-write based on the name
>>> of the size parameter.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, this permits a kfunc like
>> int *kfunc(..., int rdonly_buf_size);
>> ...
>> int *p = kfunc(..., 20);
>> so the 'p' points to a memory buffer with size 20.
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
>>
>> This looks like a strange interface although probably there
>> is a valid reason for this as I didn't participated in
>> earlier discussions.
>
> Well, the point is I need to be able to access a memory region that
> was allocated dynamically. For drivers, the incoming data can not
> usually be bound to a static value, and so we can not have the data
> statically defined in the matching struct.
> So this allows defining a kfunc to return any memory properly
> allocated and owned by the device.
Okay, thanks for explanation.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> changes in v6:
>>> - code review from Kartikeya:
>>> - remove comment change that had no reasons to be
>>> - remove handling of PTR_TO_MEM with kfunc releases
>>> - introduce struct bpf_kfunc_arg_meta
>>> - do rdonly/rdwr_buf_size check in btf_check_kfunc_arg_match
>>> - reverted most of the changes in verifier.c
>>> - make sure kfunc acquire is using a struct pointer, not just a plain
>>> pointer
>>> - also forward ref_obj_id to PTR_TO_MEM in kfunc to not use after free
>>> the allocated memory
>>>
>>> changes in v5:
>>> - updated PTR_TO_MEM comment in btf.c to match upstream
>>> - make it read-only or read-write based on the name of size
>>>
>>> new in v4
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/bpf.h | 10 ++++++-
>>> include/linux/btf.h | 12 ++++++++
>>> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>> 4 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-19 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-12 14:58 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/23] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/23] selftests/bpf: fix config for CLS_BPF Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15 23:55 ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/23] bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to read user provided context Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15 23:56 ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-16 19:47 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-18 13:53 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/23] bpf/verifier: do not clear meta in check_mem_size Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-16 0:03 ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/23] selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-16 0:17 ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/23] bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to return an allocated mem Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-16 4:29 ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-18 14:36 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-19 16:05 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-07-16 20:32 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-18 15:28 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/23] selftests/bpf: Add tests for kfunc returning a memory pointer Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-16 4:33 ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-18 8:42 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/23] bpf: prepare for more bpf syscall to be used from kernel and user space Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-16 4:37 ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/23] libbpf: add map_get_fd_by_id and map_delete_elem in light skeleton Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-16 4:41 ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/23] HID: core: store the unique system identifier in hid_device Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15 5:00 ` Greg KH
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/23] HID: export hid_report_type to uapi Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15 5:00 ` Greg KH
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/23] HID: convert defines of HID class requests into a proper enum Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15 5:01 ` Greg KH
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 12/23] HID: initial BPF implementation Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-13 8:48 ` Quentin Monnet
2022-07-13 11:36 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15 5:02 ` Greg KH
2022-07-15 9:56 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-15 11:43 ` Greg KH
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 13/23] selftests/bpf: add tests for the HID-bpf initial implementation Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 14/23] HID: bpf: allocate data memory for device_event BPF programs Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 15/23] selftests/bpf/hid: add test to change the report size Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 16/23] HID: bpf: introduce hid_hw_request() Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 17/23] selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_hid_hw_request Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 18/23] HID: bpf: allow to change the report descriptor Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 19/23] selftests/bpf: add report descriptor fixup tests Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 20/23] selftests/bpf: Add a test for BPF_F_INSERT_HEAD Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 21/23] samples/bpf: add new hid_mouse example Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-13 12:06 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-07-13 12:32 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 22/23] HID: bpf: add Surface Dial example Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 23/23] Documentation: add HID-BPF docs Benjamin Tissoires
2022-07-14 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/23] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-15 17:34 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d244394a-bea9-bced-fc9e-ffbc096631ed@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@cilium.io \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tero.kristo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox