BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
	Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	sdf@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/8] libbpf: Create a bpf_link in bpf_map__attach_struct_ops().
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 16:48:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d39b2168-a79d-ad84-ba34-17ca4eb6ead2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZjEm_cKNnZZrDHci0i-vOvCOvCdWd3KBOeiBC0=FoM7Q@mail.gmail.com>



On 3/17/23 15:23, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:37 PM Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com> wrote:
>>
>> bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() was creating a dummy bpf_link as a
>> placeholder, but now it is constructing an authentic one by calling
>> bpf_link_create() if the map has the BPF_F_LINK flag.
>>
>> You can flag a struct_ops map with BPF_F_LINK by calling
>> bpf_map__set_map_flags().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>   1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> [...]
> 
>> -               if (!prog)
>> -                       continue;
>> +       link->link.detach = bpf_link__detach_struct_ops;
>>
>> -               prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
>> -               kern_data = st_ops->kern_vdata + st_ops->kern_func_off[i];
>> -               *(unsigned long *)kern_data = prog_fd;
>> +       if (!(map->def.map_flags & BPF_F_LINK)) {
>> +               /* w/o a real link */
>> +               link->link.fd = map->fd;
>> +               link->map_fd = -1;
>> +               return &link->link;
>>          }
>>
>> -       err = bpf_map_update_elem(map->fd, &zero, st_ops->kern_vdata, 0);
>> -       if (err) {
>> -               err = -errno;
>> +       fd = bpf_link_create(map->fd, -1, BPF_STRUCT_OPS, NULL);
> 
> pass 0, not -1. BPF APIs have a convention that fd=0 means "no fd was
> provided". And actually kernel should have rejected this -1, so please
> check why that didn't happen in your testing, we might be missing some
> kernel validation.

Oh! probe_perf_link() also pass -1 as well.
I will fix it.

> 
> 
>> +       if (fd < 0) {
>>                  free(link);
>> -               return libbpf_err_ptr(err);
>> +               return libbpf_err_ptr(fd);
>>          }
>>
>> -       link->detach = bpf_link__detach_struct_ops;
>> -       link->fd = map->fd;
>> +       link->link.fd = fd;
>> +       link->map_fd = map->fd;
>>
>> -       return link;
>> +       return &link->link;
>>   }
>>
>>   typedef enum bpf_perf_event_ret (*bpf_perf_event_print_t)(struct perf_event_header *hdr,
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-17 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-16  2:36 [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/8] Transit between BPF TCP congestion controls Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-16  2:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/8] bpf: Retire the struct_ops map kvalue->refcnt Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-17 16:47   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-17 20:41     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-16  2:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/8] net: Update an existing TCP congestion control algorithm Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-17 15:23   ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-03-17 17:18     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-17 17:23       ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-03-17 21:46         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-17 23:07     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-16  2:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/8] bpf: Create links for BPF struct_ops maps Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-17 18:10   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-17 20:52     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-16  2:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/8] libbpf: Create a bpf_link in bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-17 18:44   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-17 21:00     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-17 22:23   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-17 23:48     ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2023-03-16  2:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 5/8] bpf: Update the struct_ops of a bpf_link Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-17 19:23   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-17 21:39     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-18  1:11     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-18  5:38       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-17 22:27   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-18  0:41     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-16  2:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 6/8] libbpf: Update a bpf_link with another struct_ops Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-17 19:42   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-17 21:40     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-17 22:33   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-18  1:17     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-16  2:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 7/8] libbpf: Use .struct_ops.link section to indicate a struct_ops with a link Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-17 22:35   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-16  2:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 8/8] selftests/bpf: Test switching TCP Congestion Control algorithms Kui-Feng Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d39b2168-a79d-ad84-ba34-17ca4eb6ead2@gmail.com \
    --to=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox