* [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: add bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc
@ 2025-07-02 21:03 Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-02 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] " Ihor Solodrai
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ihor Solodrai @ 2025-07-02 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf; +Cc: andrii, ast, eddyz87, mykyta.yatsenko5, mykolal, kernel-team
Implement bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc and add tests for it.
v3->v4:
* do error checks after slice, nits
v2->v3:
* nits and slow-path loop rewrite (Andrii)
* simplify xdp chunks test (Mykyta)
v1->v2:
* handle non-linear buffers with bpf_dynptr_write()
* change function signature to include offset arg
* add more test cases
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250630212113.573097-1-isolodrai@meta.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250624205240.1311453-1-isolodrai@meta.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250618223310.3684760-1-isolodrai@meta.com/
Ihor Solodrai (2):
bpf: add bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc
selftests/bpf: add test cases for bpf_dynptr_memset()
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 47 ++++++
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c | 8 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 213 insertions(+)
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: add bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc
2025-07-02 21:03 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: add bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc Ihor Solodrai
@ 2025-07-02 21:03 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-02 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test cases for bpf_dynptr_memset() Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-03 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: add bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ihor Solodrai @ 2025-07-02 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf; +Cc: andrii, ast, eddyz87, mykyta.yatsenko5, mykolal, kernel-team
Currently there is no straightforward way to fill dynptr memory with a
value (most commonly zero). One can do it with bpf_dynptr_write(), but
a temporary buffer is necessary for that.
Implement bpf_dynptr_memset() - an analogue of memset() from libc.
Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <isolodrai@meta.com>
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index f48fa3fe8dec..5269381d6d3d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2907,6 +2907,52 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_dynptr_copy(struct bpf_dynptr *dst_ptr, u32 dst_off,
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * bpf_dynptr_memset() - Fill dynptr memory with a constant byte.
+ * @p: Destination dynptr - where data will be filled
+ * @offset: Offset into the dynptr to start filling from
+ * @size: Number of bytes to fill
+ * @val: Constant byte to fill the memory with
+ *
+ * Fills the @size bytes of the memory area pointed to by @p
+ * at @offset with the constant byte @val.
+ * Returns 0 on success; negative error, otherwise.
+ */
+ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_dynptr_memset(struct bpf_dynptr *p, u32 offset, u32 size, u8 val)
+ {
+ struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr = (struct bpf_dynptr_kern *)p;
+ u32 chunk_sz, write_off;
+ char buf[256];
+ void* slice;
+ int err;
+
+ slice = bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr(p, offset, NULL, size);
+ if (likely(slice)) {
+ memset(slice, val, size);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (__bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly(ptr))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ err = bpf_dynptr_check_off_len(ptr, offset, size);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ /* Non-linear data under the dynptr, write from a local buffer */
+ chunk_sz = min_t(u32, sizeof(buf), size);
+ memset(buf, val, chunk_sz);
+
+ for (write_off = 0; write_off < size; write_off += chunk_sz) {
+ chunk_sz = min_t(u32, sizeof(buf), size - write_off);
+ err = __bpf_dynptr_write(ptr, offset + write_off, buf, chunk_sz, 0);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
__bpf_kfunc void *bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx(void *obj)
{
return obj;
@@ -3735,6 +3781,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_size)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_clone)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_copy)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_memset)
#ifdef CONFIG_NET
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_modify_return_test_tp)
#endif
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test cases for bpf_dynptr_memset()
2025-07-02 21:03 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: add bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-02 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] " Ihor Solodrai
@ 2025-07-02 21:03 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-03 15:34 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2025-07-03 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: add bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ihor Solodrai @ 2025-07-02 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf; +Cc: andrii, ast, eddyz87, mykyta.yatsenko5, mykolal, kernel-team
Add tests to verify the behavior of bpf_dynptr_memset():
* normal memset 0
* normal memset non-0
* memset with an offset
* memset in dynptr that was adjusted
* error: size overflow
* error: offset+size overflow
* error: readonly dynptr
* memset into non-linear xdp dynptr
Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <isolodrai@meta.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c | 8 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c
index 62e7ec775f24..f2b65398afce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c
@@ -21,6 +21,14 @@ static struct {
{"test_dynptr_data", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
{"test_dynptr_copy", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
{"test_dynptr_copy_xdp", SETUP_XDP_PROG},
+ {"test_dynptr_memset_zero", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
+ {"test_dynptr_memset_notzero", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
+ {"test_dynptr_memset_zero_offset", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
+ {"test_dynptr_memset_zero_adjusted", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
+ {"test_dynptr_memset_overflow", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
+ {"test_dynptr_memset_overflow_offset", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
+ {"test_dynptr_memset_readonly", SETUP_SKB_PROG},
+ {"test_dynptr_memset_xdp_chunks", SETUP_XDP_PROG},
{"test_ringbuf", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
{"test_skb_readonly", SETUP_SKB_PROG},
{"test_dynptr_skb_data", SETUP_SKB_PROG},
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c
index a0391f9da2d4..7d7081d05d47 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c
@@ -681,6 +681,164 @@ int test_dynptr_copy_xdp(struct xdp_md *xdp)
return XDP_DROP;
}
+char memset_zero_data[] = "data to be zeroed";
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+int test_dynptr_memset_zero(void *ctx)
+{
+ __u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_zero_data);
+ char zeroes[32] = {'\0'};
+ struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+
+ err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_zero_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
+ err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, data_sz, 0);
+ err = err ?: bpf_memcmp(zeroes, memset_zero_data, data_sz);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#define DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL 42
+
+char memset_notzero_data[] = "data to be overwritten";
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+int test_dynptr_memset_notzero(void *ctx)
+{
+ u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_notzero_data);
+ struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+ char expected[32];
+
+ __builtin_memset(expected, DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL, data_sz);
+
+ err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_notzero_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
+ err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, data_sz, DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL);
+ err = err ?: bpf_memcmp(expected, memset_notzero_data, data_sz);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char memset_zero_offset_data[] = "data to be zeroed partially";
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+int test_dynptr_memset_zero_offset(void *ctx)
+{
+ char expected[] = "data to \0\0\0\0eroed partially";
+ __u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_zero_offset_data);
+ struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+
+ err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_zero_offset_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
+ err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 8, 4, 0);
+ err = err ?: bpf_memcmp(expected, memset_zero_offset_data, data_sz);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char memset_zero_adjusted_data[] = "data to be zeroed partially";
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+int test_dynptr_memset_zero_adjusted(void *ctx)
+{
+ char expected[] = "data\0\0\0\0be zeroed partially";
+ __u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_zero_adjusted_data);
+ struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+
+ err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_zero_adjusted_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
+ err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_adjust(&ptr, 4, 8);
+ err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, bpf_dynptr_size(&ptr), 0);
+ err = err ?: bpf_memcmp(expected, memset_zero_adjusted_data, data_sz);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char memset_overflow_data[] = "memset overflow data";
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+int test_dynptr_memset_overflow(void *ctx)
+{
+ __u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_overflow_data);
+ struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+ int ret;
+
+ err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_overflow_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
+ ret = bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, data_sz + 1, 0);
+ if (ret != -E2BIG)
+ err = 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+int test_dynptr_memset_overflow_offset(void *ctx)
+{
+ __u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_overflow_data);
+ struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+ int ret;
+
+ err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_overflow_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
+ ret = bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 1, data_sz, 0);
+ if (ret != -E2BIG)
+ err = 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?cgroup_skb/egress")
+int test_dynptr_memset_readonly(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+ int ret;
+
+ err = bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &ptr);
+
+ /* cgroup skbs are read only, memset should fail */
+ ret = bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, bpf_dynptr_size(&ptr), 0);
+ if (ret != -EINVAL)
+ err = 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#define min_t(type, x, y) ({ \
+ type __x = (x); \
+ type __y = (y); \
+ __x < __y ? __x : __y; })
+
+SEC("xdp")
+int test_dynptr_memset_xdp_chunks(struct xdp_md *xdp)
+{
+ u32 data_sz, chunk_sz, offset = 0;
+ const int max_chunks = 200;
+ struct bpf_dynptr ptr_xdp;
+ char expected_buf[32];
+ char buf[32];
+ int i;
+
+ __builtin_memset(expected_buf, DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL, sizeof(expected_buf));
+
+ /* ptr_xdp is backed by non-contiguous memory */
+ bpf_dynptr_from_xdp(xdp, 0, &ptr_xdp);
+ data_sz = bpf_dynptr_size(&ptr_xdp);
+
+ err = bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr_xdp, 0, data_sz, DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+
+ bpf_for(i, 0, max_chunks) {
+ offset = i * sizeof(buf);
+ if (offset >= data_sz)
+ goto out;
+ chunk_sz = min_t(u32, sizeof(buf), data_sz - offset);
+ err = bpf_dynptr_read(&buf, chunk_sz, &ptr_xdp, offset, 0);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+ err = bpf_memcmp(buf, expected_buf, sizeof(buf));
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+ }
+out:
+ return XDP_DROP;
+}
+
void *user_ptr;
/* Contains the copy of the data pointed by user_ptr.
* Size 384 to make it not fit into a single kernel chunk when copying
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test cases for bpf_dynptr_memset()
2025-07-02 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test cases for bpf_dynptr_memset() Ihor Solodrai
@ 2025-07-03 15:34 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mykyta Yatsenko @ 2025-07-03 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ihor.solodrai, bpf; +Cc: andrii, ast, eddyz87, mykolal, kernel-team
On 7/2/25 22:03, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
> Add tests to verify the behavior of bpf_dynptr_memset():
> * normal memset 0
> * normal memset non-0
> * memset with an offset
> * memset in dynptr that was adjusted
> * error: size overflow
> * error: offset+size overflow
> * error: readonly dynptr
> * memset into non-linear xdp dynptr
>
> Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <isolodrai@meta.com>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c | 8 +
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c
> index 62e7ec775f24..f2b65398afce 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,14 @@ static struct {
> {"test_dynptr_data", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
> {"test_dynptr_copy", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
> {"test_dynptr_copy_xdp", SETUP_XDP_PROG},
> + {"test_dynptr_memset_zero", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
> + {"test_dynptr_memset_notzero", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
> + {"test_dynptr_memset_zero_offset", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
> + {"test_dynptr_memset_zero_adjusted", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
> + {"test_dynptr_memset_overflow", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
> + {"test_dynptr_memset_overflow_offset", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
> + {"test_dynptr_memset_readonly", SETUP_SKB_PROG},
> + {"test_dynptr_memset_xdp_chunks", SETUP_XDP_PROG},
> {"test_ringbuf", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
> {"test_skb_readonly", SETUP_SKB_PROG},
> {"test_dynptr_skb_data", SETUP_SKB_PROG},
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c
> index a0391f9da2d4..7d7081d05d47 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c
> @@ -681,6 +681,164 @@ int test_dynptr_copy_xdp(struct xdp_md *xdp)
> return XDP_DROP;
> }
>
> +char memset_zero_data[] = "data to be zeroed";
> +
> +SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
> +int test_dynptr_memset_zero(void *ctx)
> +{
> + __u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_zero_data);
> + char zeroes[32] = {'\0'};
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> +
> + err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_zero_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
> + err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, data_sz, 0);
> + err = err ?: bpf_memcmp(zeroes, memset_zero_data, data_sz);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#define DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL 42
> +
> +char memset_notzero_data[] = "data to be overwritten";
> +
> +SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
> +int test_dynptr_memset_notzero(void *ctx)
> +{
> + u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_notzero_data);
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> + char expected[32];
> +
> + __builtin_memset(expected, DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL, data_sz);
> +
> + err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_notzero_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
> + err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, data_sz, DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL);
> + err = err ?: bpf_memcmp(expected, memset_notzero_data, data_sz);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +char memset_zero_offset_data[] = "data to be zeroed partially";
> +
> +SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
> +int test_dynptr_memset_zero_offset(void *ctx)
> +{
> + char expected[] = "data to \0\0\0\0eroed partially";
> + __u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_zero_offset_data);
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> +
> + err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_zero_offset_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
> + err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 8, 4, 0);
> + err = err ?: bpf_memcmp(expected, memset_zero_offset_data, data_sz);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +char memset_zero_adjusted_data[] = "data to be zeroed partially";
> +
> +SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
> +int test_dynptr_memset_zero_adjusted(void *ctx)
> +{
> + char expected[] = "data\0\0\0\0be zeroed partially";
> + __u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_zero_adjusted_data);
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> +
> + err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_zero_adjusted_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
> + err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_adjust(&ptr, 4, 8);
> + err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, bpf_dynptr_size(&ptr), 0);
> + err = err ?: bpf_memcmp(expected, memset_zero_adjusted_data, data_sz);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +char memset_overflow_data[] = "memset overflow data";
> +
> +SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
> +int test_dynptr_memset_overflow(void *ctx)
> +{
> + __u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_overflow_data);
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_overflow_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
> + ret = bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, data_sz + 1, 0);
> + if (ret != -E2BIG)
> + err = 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
> +int test_dynptr_memset_overflow_offset(void *ctx)
> +{
> + __u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_overflow_data);
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_overflow_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
> + ret = bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 1, data_sz, 0);
> + if (ret != -E2BIG)
> + err = 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?cgroup_skb/egress")
> +int test_dynptr_memset_readonly(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + err = bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &ptr);
> +
> + /* cgroup skbs are read only, memset should fail */
> + ret = bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, bpf_dynptr_size(&ptr), 0);
> + if (ret != -EINVAL)
> + err = 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#define min_t(type, x, y) ({ \
> + type __x = (x); \
> + type __y = (y); \
> + __x < __y ? __x : __y; })
> +
> +SEC("xdp")
> +int test_dynptr_memset_xdp_chunks(struct xdp_md *xdp)
> +{
> + u32 data_sz, chunk_sz, offset = 0;
> + const int max_chunks = 200;
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr_xdp;
> + char expected_buf[32];
> + char buf[32];
> + int i;
> +
> + __builtin_memset(expected_buf, DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL, sizeof(expected_buf));
> +
> + /* ptr_xdp is backed by non-contiguous memory */
> + bpf_dynptr_from_xdp(xdp, 0, &ptr_xdp);
> + data_sz = bpf_dynptr_size(&ptr_xdp);
> +
> + err = bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr_xdp, 0, data_sz, DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + bpf_for(i, 0, max_chunks) {
> + offset = i * sizeof(buf);
> + if (offset >= data_sz)
> + goto out;
> + chunk_sz = min_t(u32, sizeof(buf), data_sz - offset);
> + err = bpf_dynptr_read(&buf, chunk_sz, &ptr_xdp, offset, 0);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> + err = bpf_memcmp(buf, expected_buf, sizeof(buf));
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> + }
> +out:
> + return XDP_DROP;
> +}
> +
> void *user_ptr;
> /* Contains the copy of the data pointed by user_ptr.
> * Size 384 to make it not fit into a single kernel chunk when copying
Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: add bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc
2025-07-02 21:03 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: add bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-02 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] " Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-02 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test cases for bpf_dynptr_memset() Ihor Solodrai
@ 2025-07-03 22:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2025-07-03 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ihor Solodrai
Cc: bpf, andrii, ast, eddyz87, mykyta.yatsenko5, mykolal, kernel-team
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 14:03:07 -0700 you wrote:
> Implement bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc and add tests for it.
>
> v3->v4:
> * do error checks after slice, nits
> v2->v3:
> * nits and slow-path loop rewrite (Andrii)
> * simplify xdp chunks test (Mykyta)
> v1->v2:
> * handle non-linear buffers with bpf_dynptr_write()
> * change function signature to include offset arg
> * add more test cases
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v4,1/2] bpf: add bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5fc5d8fded57
- [bpf-next,v4,2/2] selftests/bpf: add test cases for bpf_dynptr_memset()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7b29689263fb
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-03 22:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-02 21:03 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: add bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-02 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] " Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-02 21:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test cases for bpf_dynptr_memset() Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-03 15:34 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2025-07-03 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: add bpf_dynptr_memset() kfunc patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).