Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: convert test_skb_cgroup_id_user to test_progs

[Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>]

On 01/08/2024 11:12, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> On 8/1/24 10:49, Alan Maguire wrote:
>> On 31/07/2024 11:38, Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> +static int wait_local_ip(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	char *ping_cmd = ping_command(AF_INET6);
>>> +	int i, err;
>>> +
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < WAIT_AUTO_IP_MAX_ATTEMPT; i++) {
>>> +		err = SYS_NOFAIL("%s -c 1 -W 1 %s%%%s", ping_cmd, DST_ADDR,
>>> +				 VETH_1);
>>> +		if (!err)
>>> +			break;
>>> +	}
>>
>>
>> thinking about the risks of CI flakiness, would a small sleep between
>> checks be worth doing here?
> 
> I assumed that adding -W 1 (ping timeout duration) to the command would be
> enough to make sure that there is a proper wait between each attempt (so
> currently, waiting at most 10s for network configuration between the 2 veths).
> Don't you think it is enough to prevent issues in CI ?
>

Yep, that should be fine, I missed the wait option.

>>> +
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> +
>>> +	expected_ids[0] = get_cgroup_id("/.."); /* root cgroup */
>>> +	expected_ids[1] = get_cgroup_id("");
>>> +	expected_ids[2] = get_cgroup_id(CGROUP_PATH);
>>> +	expected_ids[3] = 0; /* non-existent cgroup */
>>> +
>>> +	for (level = 0; level < NUM_CGROUP_LEVELS; level++) {
>>> +		err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(t->skel->maps.cgroup_ids, &level,
>>> +					   sizeof(level), &actual_ids[level],
>>> +					   sizeof(__u64), 0);
>>
>> could probably simplify this + the BPF prog using a global array of
>> actual_ids[], then compare it to the expected values using
>> skel->bss->actual_ids
> 
> ACK, I'll update this.
>

Great, thanks!

Alan